Should the Above User be Banned for Their Avatar?

[morky]

Yes. Low qualiy shit fuck you

[mr hobo]

Nope

[KING]THT[WRATH]

yes you look better

[Suomi_Poika<]

Nope

[bobdoe]

Yup

[Suomi_Poika<]

[QUOTE=bobdoe;45369821]Yup[/QUOTE]

Really?

[Daniel Smith]

no

[Jrose14]

She looks like she's on drugs. This cannot be allowed. Ban it.

[Bee York]

you are a disgrace to humanity for using such disgusting pornography as an avatar
ofc yes

[gk99]

Yeah sure why not

[DG-117]

Yes, children are not allowed on this site.

[DarkKrystal]

no
its beautiful

[sa2fan]

nah

[bobdoe]

No

[normal boy]

handshakes? a lot of sexual tension.

Change or face the hammer

[DeVotchKa]

[QUOTE=riki2cool;45371204]handshakes? a lot of sexual tension.

Change or face the hammer[/QUOTE]

Avatar spitting vaguely white stuff, 0/10 NSFW would perma on sight.

[Disposable Grunt]

You are perma'd Mr Hypn...no you aren't. Sorry.

[normal boy]

I'm pretty sure that guy is naked underneath those clothes.

Ban, obviously, for nsfw

[Slendistry]

Yes, only utilising half of the available avatar space.

[Bee York]

perma on sight

[Stevec]

too lewd, ban.

[normal boy]

I like how you censored it, but it's still NSFW even if it isn't 100 % explicit

[editline]nov[/editline]

Not fast enough for fast threads. That's allowed.

[Jeff_epic_mopeds]

Totally. Blue frogs are way too suggestive.

[OldAverageJoe]

yes

[ScoutBr0]

No

[GreenLynx]

Nah

[normal boy]

No, it looks fine. You should put borders around it though

[bobdoe]

Spitting? Change the attitude or face the hammer.

[Oskutin]

Nope.

Lets shake hands.

[brickbox]

[QUOTE=oskutin;45371973]Nope.

Lets shake hands.[/QUOTE]

Yes

The gear looks vaguely like a cock ring.