[QUOTE=Scot;47478240]To be fair that first one didn't look so hot to begin with[/QUOTE]
Probably was taken just as fighting began.
Them boosters.
[vid]http://a.pomf.se/rwsqcl.webm[/vid]
I'll take 10
Shut up and take my money
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;47481943]I'll take 10
Shut up and take my money[/QUOTE]
That is Anthony Le, he actually makes those suites or other cosplay alone.
You can contact him and he can make one for you, not sure what his prices are.
[url]http://www.masterle.org/[/url]
Henry Ford receiving the Grand Cross of the German Eagle from Nazi officials.
[T]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-T-SV1WOVZ-4/UTuNVmY5SCI/AAAAAAAAC0c/0OqR5BwLelE/s1600/Henry+Ford+receiving+the+Grand+Cross+of+the+German+Eagle+from+Nazi+officials.+1938.jpg[/T]
Winston Churchill with a fucking tommygun
[T]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-sSgrvP4Z-3s/Ur9bLkP0tFI/AAAAAAAAIHA/uQUs54laFTA/s1600/Winston+Churchill+with+a+Tommy+Gun+during+an+inspection+near+Harlepool,+1940.jpg[/T]
[QUOTE=erkor;47487571]
Winston Churchill with a fucking tommygun
[T]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-sSgrvP4Z-3s/Ur9bLkP0tFI/AAAAAAAAIHA/uQUs54laFTA/s1600/Winston+Churchill+with+a+Tommy+Gun+during+an+inspection+near+Harlepool,+1940.jpg[/T][/QUOTE]
Churchill: the original gangster.
It's not the hat, it's the cigar
[QUOTE=thermobaric;47477522]wasn't this picture made with hundreds of individual pictures?[/QUOTE]
His Flickr: [url]https://www.flickr.com/photos/usgsbiml/with/16820879672/[/url]
Yes it was made with lots of pictures, for the purpose of getting less DoF.
Powerful macro lenses give extreme amounts of DoF, so to fix that you can either:
1 - Close the aperture down, which has its limits and drawbacks. By closing the aperture you reduce DoF, but you also shut out light so you'll need a stronger light source. Additionally, with very closed apertures your image eventually becomes subject to [url=https://fstoppers.com/studio/fstoppers-original-what-lens-diffraction-and-when-does-diffraction-happen-6022]diffraction[/url] which reduces sharpness.
2 - You can take many pictures where you focus differently in each one and use a special program to stack them together! This also has some downsides, for instance don't even bother trying it with moving things.
[url=http://zerenesystems.com/cms/stacker]Zerene Stacker[/url] is a macro stacking program. It will analyze all the photos, and only keep the sharpest / most in focus parts.
[img]http://zerenesystems.com/cms/_media/overview.jpg[/img]
Anyways, I have the same lens as the bee guy uses (Canon MP-E 65mm 1-5x macro lens) and I've been doing some stacking myself.
Here's the best one I have at the moment. I'm still trying to work out all the quirks and challenges. It's not as straight forward as one might think.
[url=https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3956/14987245464_9eeac9b5b1_o.jpg][img]https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3956/14987245464_431da3dde7_c.jpg[/img][/url]
(click for full resolution)
That is impressive.
is that weed
[QUOTE=Mindfuck;47497678]is that weed[/QUOTE]
Clearly, you can recognize it by the tentacles on the tip.
Photos from Sundance Festival, took with traditional 19th century camera. Breathtakingly amazing:
[img]http://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2015/04/Victoria-Will-Profoto-Pro-8-Sundance-Redford.jpg[/img][img]http://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2015/04/Victoria-Will-Profoto-Pro-8-Sundance-Weaving.jpg[/img][img]http://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2015/04/Victoria-Will-Profoto-Pro-8-Sundance-Nolte.jpg[/img][img]http://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2015/04/Victoria-Will-Profoto-Pro-8-Sundance-Odenkirk.jpg[/img][img]http://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2015/04/Victoria-Will-Profoto-Pro-8-Sundance-Hawke.jpg[/img][img]http://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2015/04/Victoria-Will-Profoto-Pro-8-Sundance-Momoa.jpg[/img][img]http://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2015/04/Victoria-Will-Profoto-Pro-8-Sundance-Cassel.jpg[/img][img]http://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2015/04/Victoria-Will-Profoto-Pro-8-Sundance-Nicholson.jpg[/img][img]http://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2015/04/Victoria-Will-Profoto-Pro-8-Sundance-Bacon.jpg[/img][img]http://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2015/04/Victoria-Will-Profoto-Pro-8-Sundance-Thirlby.jpg[/img]
[url=http://www.victoriawill.com/TINTYPES-2015]Any many, many more[/url]
[QUOTE=Joz;47507103]Photos from Sundance Festival, took with traditional 19th century camera. Breathtakingly amazing:
[url=http://www.victoriawill.com/TINTYPES-2015]Any many, many more[/url][/QUOTE]
I looked at the pictures before I read the description for them and I was wondering what the fuck Bob Odenkirk was doing in the 19th century
[sp]The only other person in there I can identify in the pictures you posted is Kevin Bacon, but even then I only managed to do so after I realized what the pictures were :v: [/SP]
Sam Elliot just doesn't look right without his mustache though.
[IMG]http://payload336.cargocollective.com/1/9/314265/9025087/2015_Sundance_Elliot109_388.JPG[/IMG]
It's really interesting to see these and realize that the only reason all 19th century pictures don't look this clear and resolute is that they tend to have been sitting around in attics and the like for 100+ years.
[QUOTE=DanRatherman;47508416]It's really interesting to see these and realize that the only reason all 19th century pictures don't look this clear and resolute is that they tend to have been sitting around in attics and the like for 100+ years.[/QUOTE]
I'd say that definitely plays a role, but if you look at pictures taken with similar cameras to the one used there (I'm pretty certain I have at least once) most of the photos they take look like that.
[QUOTE][img]http://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2015/04/Victoria-Will-Profoto-Pro-8-Sundance-Momoa.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
That's a wanted poster if I ever saw one.
[QUOTE=Joz;47507103]Photos from Sundance Festival, took with traditional 19th century camera. Breathtakingly amazing:[/QUOTE]
Ah yes, these were usually taken on metal or glass plates.
The negatives are very large, hence the shallow DoF. The resolution can be extremely high on this sort of photography.
We had a teacher that mainly did wet-plate photography, which is what you're seeing here.
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collodion_process[/url]
[QUOTE=Teddybeer;47477685]What camera do you use for it?[/QUOTE]
Sorry for the late response
It's this one [url]https://www.spycameracctv.com/spycamera/birdbox-nestbox-day-night-camera-20m-av[/url]
Quite a cheap one because I wasn't sure if the birds would even nest in it so I didn't want to splash out
It's absolute pig shit for several reasons
The audio is effectively useless because it has a constant, [i]really[/i] obnoxious and overpowering buzzing sound
It also has a shitty pink colour cast throughout the day when it's halfway between infra-red mode and daylight mode - guess I should have made bigger windows to let in more light
She started building the nest today
Preliminary moss padding pretty much complete
[img]http://i.imgur.com/71E1Sp1.png[/img]
Next year I think I'll get a high resolution camera with a decent microphone and possibly some LEDs or something for proper colour in the day time
[QUOTE=Winstonn;47512145]Sorry for the late response
It's this one [url]https://www.spycameracctv.com/spycamera/birdbox-nestbox-day-night-camera-20m-av[/url]
Quite a cheap one because I wasn't sure if the birds would even nest in it so I didn't want to splash out
It's absolute pig shit for several reasons
The audio is effectively useless because it has a constant, [i]really[/i] obnoxious and overpowering buzzing sound
It also has a shitty pink colour cast throughout the day when it's halfway between infra-red mode and daylight mode - guess I should have made bigger windows to let in more light
She started building the nest today
Preliminary moss padding pretty much complete
[img]http://i.imgur.com/71E1Sp1.png[/img]
Next year I think I'll get a high resolution camera with a decent microphone and possibly some LEDs or something for proper colour in the day time[/QUOTE]
Any chance you could livestream this stuff? I'd love to see it.
[IMG]http://toughpigs.com/images/people_14.jpg[/IMG]
Puppeteers honoring a legend at the Jim Henson Memorial
[QUOTE=BackwardSpy;47513188]Any chance you could livestream this stuff? I'd love to see it.[/QUOTE]
I planned on possibly livestreaming stuff like eggs hatching, chicks being fed and chicks fledging
[QUOTE=Winstonn;47516460]I planned on possibly livestreaming stuff like eggs hatching, chicks being fed and chicks fledging[/QUOTE]
Sounds good to me! :D
[t]http://www.audubon.org/sites/default/files/styles/article_hero_inline/public/editorial-card-images/article/rtr4wk5v.jpg?itok=dtE9SeNR[/t]
[quote]A black flamingo, seen at the salt lake at the Akrotiri Environmental Centre on the southern coast of Cyprus.[/quote]
[t]http://i.imgur.com/fzfQo8j.jpg[/t]
[quote]U.S. Marines with captured Japanese flags at the Battle of Cape Gloucester (New Britain, Papua New Guinea - 1944)[/quote]
[img_thumb]http://i.imgur.com/O7arp3g.jpg[/img_thumb]
[quote] A U.S. Marine, 1st Calvary (on right), endures enemy fire to rescue a small child at Hoai Chau, Vietnam, January 31, 1966 by Pulitzer Prize winning photographer Eddie Adams. The small child is bundled in the Marine's arms as he runs [/quote]
[img]http://i.imgur.com/MpXMDXq.jpg[/img]
[quote]A Japanese soldier being given a cigarette by a US Marine on Iwo Jima. Playing dead for 1 1/2 days in a shellhole with a live grenade in his hand, the soldier promised that he would not give resistance. He was later dragged out of the hole.[/quote]
[img]http://i.imgur.com/1LltoHt.jpg[/img]
Takes a lot of balls to trust an enemy soldier with a live grenade in his hand.
[QUOTE=OvB;47522934]Takes a lot of balls to trust an enemy soldier with a live grenade in his hand.[/QUOTE]
I imagine you could make the argument that if he really wanted to kill a bunch of American soldiers there were probably better opportunities.
I'll never be that much of a man. Fucking still scared of the dark, how could I go to a war and expect to perform while being shot at in shitty conditions.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
