• What rating do you want to see in Facepunch?
    137 replies, posted
[QUOTE=GhostProject;37692115]I'd like to see a "cool" one. the picture could be sweet shades[/QUOTE] Winner
[QUOTE=HellSoldier;37692134]Winner[/QUOTE] but winner isnt sweet shades!
A "rude" rating. We have a friendly rating, so howwabout the opposite?
[QUOTE=GastricTank;37692169]A "rude" rating. We have a friendly rating, so howwabout the opposite?[/QUOTE] There's always the box.
[QUOTE=GastricTank;37692169]A "rude" rating. We have a friendly rating, so howwabout the opposite?[/QUOTE] Pretty sure the "dumb" rating can be used to encompass all negative reactions
Spooky
[QUOTE=<V()LT>;37692190]Spooky[/QUOTE] That'd be Informative's sarcastic use.
A lot of these suggestions have opposites. In those cases you can just be sarcastic about it and rate them friendly for "dickhead" or informative for "nobody gives a shit" or artistic for "programmer art". The closest thing to Bad Reading would be Late.
A "fast" rating :v:
I would like Bad Reading back, we could most certainly use that again. Now people just use the box instead for situations like that, which isn't really fair to call someone an idiot just for a simple misunderstanding. I'm on the wall about Bad Spelling though. In many situations, people would often rate an amazing post not according to content, but instead be a prankster and rate them on a basis of a single spelling/grammar mistake, making others follow suit. Then the poster is left with little to no feedback on the content itself, which can be disappointing for that person. But then again, it's useful in helping others realize and fix their mistakes without slapping them upside the face with an insult.
[QUOTE=RG4;37691182]We need a "What the Christ rating."[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://www.facepunch.com//fp/emoot/wtc.gif[/IMG]
[QUOTE=PeejsterM;37692243]A "fast" rating :v:[/QUOTE] An "early" rating would be better.
Add Bad Reading, keep out spelling and replace it with bringing back the smartness system. And, like others suggested, a "what the fuck" rating, possibly with a variation of :gonk:
Shark. It basically means "Fuck you."
[QUOTE=RG4;37691182]We need a "What the Christ rating."[/QUOTE] This should be used for it: [quote][img]http://fi.somethingawful.com/images/smilies/emot-eek.gif[/img][/quote]
bad reading and bad spelling back would be more than nice
fuck you
bad reading/spelling etc. woo bandwagon I guess that's what late and dumb are for though.
i'd like bad reading back other than that i feel there's nothing that needs to be added
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/eNQ3y.png[/IMG] Spooky x 1
High Fashion
bed speelin
a :frog: rating and it should automatically report the post
[QUOTE=Cyanlime;37695214][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/eNQ3y.png[/IMG] Spooky x 1[/QUOTE]
"Terrorist alert" So when someone mentions they want to assasinate Obama or something we can rate him that and he will get arrested.
This, or something like it: [img]http://www.3dtv.com/images/props-wtf-icon-org-small.png[/img] x [b]1[/b]
Misinformative. Would be so incredibly useful in Sensationalist Headlines.
[QUOTE=Ardosos;37696616]Misinformative. Would be so incredibly useful in Sensationalist Headlines.[/QUOTE] Couldn't disagree fit that well though?
[QUOTE=Verratene;37696637]Couldn't disagree fit that well though?[/QUOTE] In theory, but someone might think that people disagree with their opinion rather than trying to imply that it is based on misinformation.
[QUOTE=PixelC3000;37691018]penis[/QUOTE] I second this
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.