• Most graphic intensive game?
    71 replies, posted
EnviroBear. [IMG]http://www.indiegames.com/blog/images/timw/envbear3a.png[/IMG]
Metro 2033, GTAIV, Crysis.
Original Counter Strike and Starcraft 1.
The minigame in MGS3 is pretty nasty
Saints Row 2 is a unoptimized piece of shit for the PC Tetris
snip
Metro 2033 requires a fucking Nvidia 275 GTX at the LEAST.
[b]METRO 2033[/b] /thread
GTA IV is processor intensive, not graphics intensive. Crysis is getting on a bit and isn't challenging to run whatsoever these days. Probably Metro 2033, aye.
[QUOTE=EXoDUSFLT;25737745]Metro 2033 requires a fucking Nvidia 275 GTX at the LEAST.[/QUOTE] I ran it on medium/high with a HD4670 :smugdog:
Pac-Man
Diablo 1 obviously.
[QUOTE=Wafflemaster;25739154]Pac-Man[/QUOTE] No, Pong has the best graphics, gawd!
Crysis modded by far, but vanilla no. Metro2033 takes the cake for that one.
Used to be Crysis, then Metro 2033 came along. People who say GTA IV are wrong, that game is a CPU hog, it's not anywhere near as demanding on the GPU as the CPU.
You guys are all wrong. REALTIME dynamic water. hah.
[QUOTE=Superstormj;25740064]You guys are all wrong. REALTIME dynamic water. hah.[/QUOTE] Is not a game. hah.
I can play crysis pretty well but force unleashed 2 rapes my GPU
Crysis
[QUOTE=BLOODGA$M;25736038]ARMA II still runs choppy with an HD 5870, AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE, and 4GB DDR3 1600 RAM[/QUOTE] And it doesn't even look very good after all.
[QUOTE=Mlisen14;25736041]I don't know if it's specifically graphics related but GTA IV has always been ridiculously slow compared to all other games on my PC.[/QUOTE] Gta4 has a REALLY fucking high Cpu demand.
Arma 2 will literally shit on your Xtreme Powered Graphics card and CPU once you set view distance to 10K, everything to ultrahigh on 1920x1080 and put AA and AF on. [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=EvacX;25741411]And it doesn't even look very good after all.[/QUOTE] Depends on texture packs you have or have not installed.
Metro 2033, I'd say
You guys must have computers from 2002 or something. Not one of the games mentioned even puts a strain on my PC. WTF.
Any game made by Paradox Interactive. Even NASA can't run that shit decently.
now talking serious: Metro 2033 its a obvious (does it has dx11?) Arma II and expansion Crysis (old but still needs a good rig) NFS Shift (try it on high resolutions for example 1920x1080 and then tell me) COD Black ops, i know it'll be Alien vs Predator (the newest one) (idk if its that gpu intensive or cpu intensive) Fallout 3 and New Vegas(you never know how many things can appear in the screen all at once) Just cause 2 (maybe) Lost planet 1 and 2 (motion blur can shit out your gpu) Overlord 2 (it doesnt seems but it can consume a lot of resource) Risen Stalker 1, 2 or 3 (modded obviously) SFIV (you wont believe me) Total War series, from empire and on, never try a maxed out battle with maxed out graphics. you can try it only if you have a graphics card from high series and some really good quad core processor Splinter Cell Conviction Settlers 7 (not that much but still) Dawn of war 2
[QUOTE=Archy;25735962]civ 5[/QUOTE] I can't even run the main menu.
Hellmoo
Isn't CoD Black Ops gonna be using the same engine as CoD4 and MW2 or have they improved it? Settlers 7 is quite demanding, Just Cause 2 is not.
[QUOTE=cdr248;25742056]I can't even run the main menu.[/QUOTE] i havent tried yet civ 5, maybe im buying it next week, i have a 8800gt (overclock) and core 2 duo and 2 gb ram it will it work?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.