• SWEP accuracy cone values (Tested)
    39 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Jill_Valentine;24773571]0.000375 would shoot a grouping of about 10 feet accross your "1000 metre" If I have used hammer's scale... [b]shamelessly using other's calculation so the responsibility isnt your's when its wrong... if it's right you would claimed your "smartness"[/b] even using my "PHX lol WTF scale" it would have shot a 2 feet grouping at "800 metre" I POSTED THIS HOPING TO HELP PEOPLE WITH THEIR CUSTOMIZATION... AND YOU CAME IN AND CRITICIZED EVERY SINGLE BIT OF MY TESTING TO THINK IT'S FUNNY ACTUALLY TO CONDUCTED A SERIES OF TEST AND GET MOCKED BY IDIOTS LIKE YOU ?[/QUOTE] Calm the fuck down, I'm trying to help you. If you want the angle, it's inverse tan of the opposite side divided by the adjacent side. The adjacent is 1000metres, the opposite is 1.5 inches (had to take the radius). 1.5 inches is 3.75 centimetres, divide that by 100 to get 0.0375 metres. Opposite over adjacent is 0.0375 metres over 1000, which is 0.0000375 (sorry, missed out a 0 before). This is a very small ratio so it's obviously going to be a very small angle. For instance, inverse tan of 1 (i.e. when the two sides are the same length, therefore a ratio of 1) is 45 degrees. Inverse tan of 0.0000375 is 0.003148591731 degrees. Hence negligible, but not zero. Maths ftw :buddy: But please, don't buck against people who are trying to help you. Of course, if you wanted any of the distances, it's just a case of checking the aforementioned numbers.
OP is 12 Seriously, just accept that this is useless. Nobody will need this information from you, when they can easily work it out with much greater accuracy.
I never said that I was that good at math. Anyways, I didn't bother actually looking up how to do it I admit. Cool down. Also, I never claimed what Jgcx said to be my words. Also, the SWEP.Cone is something defined in the base. So I'm going to say that my base uses SWEP.Cone as 1=180 degrees. I think that is what cs_base is too. And the bases use coordinates to map out cone, not degrees. [IMG]http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/8031/84697952.png[/IMG] Ok lets just end this. I don't want this thread to turn into more of a hatewar. [editline]12:21PM[/editline] Anyways, I'm just in Algebra 2 and school didn't even start. I don't know half of my maths.
Edited: [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Predicting moderation, flaming in earlier posts, etc." - mahalis))[/highlight]
OP, what exactly are you looking for?!
Edited: [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Predicting moderation, flaming in earlier posts, etc." - mahalis))[/highlight]
I thought gmod was not real life? FYI, No video games to date are to scale, meaning that the players are not well-scaled to the environment, causing the player to be huge. The only game that may possibly have a better scale is Crysis 2. [editline]01:22PM[/editline] So there really is no point. I'm not going to yell at you, but this doesn't really have much of a point.
Edited: [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Predicting moderation, flaming in earlier posts, etc." - mahalis))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=Jill_Valentine;24775042]I also see no point in you posting in my thread since I conducted the testing and stuffs... and you just choose to come in and "your stuffs isnt correct"....... no point conducting... that is my affairs... and isnt your's... this thread is entirely my opinion... so whether people uses my opinion is their free will but posting in the thread in a near-trolling way of phrasing your words is simply asking for trouble yourself... blame yourself for the response[/QUOTE] If you post on facepunch, you're potentially opening yourself to a lot of shit. That's what people are like. But don't worry, I'm happy to help :buddy:
Obvious troll thread? [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Why reply?" - mahalis))[/highlight]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.