Idk someone gave me a 4/5 with the words "works great, but the things the creator says gives me cancer"
I dont think you're suppose to review based on disliking the creator...
[QUOTE=Handsome Matt;42987451]I would be pretty unhappy if your words gave me cancer, please stop saying words.[/QUOTE]
Die
I think he was referring to your overly egotistical addon description, which could be included as part of the addon I guess.
I dont get how it's egotistical. Anything stated is true, and avoided certain words so nothing is incorrect.
Feel free to point out anything thats "egotistical"
[QUOTE=Handsome Matt;42987307]I think he's upset he was given a 3 star review. 5 stars are reserved for extremely premium scripts in my opinion.[/QUOTE]
Still, if the script was great and easy to use you give 5 stars not 3.
Some buyers are just idiots and annoying because they leave shitty review for not being able to install the script. (It happened to me)
"I'm Zero The Fallen, a well known coder. I can block every single cheat + bypass I come across."
[QUOTE=>>oubliette<<;42987609]"I'm Zero The Fallen, a well known coder. I can block every single cheat + bypass I come across."[/QUOTE]
Im well known, and if a public cheat or bypass is given to me/ I come across. And Guess what, it gets blocked. There isnt a single public cheat that isn't picked up (nothing is even coded well wow). By public I mean available for straight up download on mpgh/hf etc
Like I said, I do what I say. I avoided anything i cant do
[QUOTE=zerothefallen;42987421]Idk someone gave me a 4/5 with the words "works great, but the things the creator says gives me cancer"
I dont think you're suppose to review based on disliking the creator...[/QUOTE]
i got a 1/5 from someone who said "it doesn't work" because he was installing it completely wrong, when I even fucking helped him after 6 hours and we finally figured it out he still hasn't changed the review. Also, addons folder to some people apparently = the darkrp module folder
[img]http://i.cubeupload.com/ZBnhzX.png[/img]
Wow, that was quick. Thanks Valve!
I got a 1/5 because "it spams chat a bit much".
[QUOTE=zerothefallen;42988054]Im well known, and if a public cheat or bypass is given to me/ I come across. And Guess what, it gets blocked. There isnt a single public cheat that isn't picked up (nothing is even coded well wow). By public I mean available for straight up download on mpgh/hf etc
Like I said, I do what I say. I avoided anything i cant do[/QUOTE]
I make my own DarkRP cheats. :D
(PLZ DON'T BAN ME DARKRP SERVER OWNERS)
[QUOTE=zerothefallen;42988054]Im well known, and if a public cheat or bypass is given to me/ I come across. And Guess what, it gets blocked. There isnt a single public cheat that isn't picked up (nothing is even coded well wow). By public I mean available for straight up download on mpgh/hf etc
Like I said, I do what I say. I avoided anything i cant do[/QUOTE]
My stuff still bypasses yours and my stuff is still public. I mentioned blocking two of your netmessages completely renders your AC useless and you said :
[QUOTE=zerothefallen;42630654]Meh, i dont plan on attempting to detect people with load priority[/QUOTE]
Granted detecting my stuff is easy and you could probably do it if you wanted to, but myg0t and their drug addicts followers are working on a C++ cheat half stolen from ph0ne's CS:S cheat - that will be released as far as I'm aware, what will you do about that?
[QUOTE=>>oubliette<<;42988633]My stuff still bypasses yours and my stuff is still public. I mentioned blocking two of your netmessages completely renders your AC useless and you said :
Granted detecting my stuff is easy and you could probably do it if you wanted to, but myg0t and their drug addicts followers are working on a C++ cheat half stolen from ph0ne's CS:S cheat - that will be released as far as I'm aware, what will you do about that?[/QUOTE]
Incorrect. Your cheat is detected. Your loader is not. Your "cheat" isnt public either (i dont remember a private github you cant find unless asked for as "public". If you compile it and release it somewhere then maybe you have ground.
Also you cant detect c++, it doesnt even interact with lua. If they know what they're doing, you cant do shit. Dont bring up stupid shit. As well in my readme, i already state it detects a vast majority of all cheats, but not all of them.
Stop implying I am claiming "it detects everything!!"
It's incredibly stupid and im glad you like to make yourself look stupid
[QUOTE=zerothefallen;42988992]Incorrect. Your cheat is detected. Your loader is not. Your "cheat" isnt public either (i dont remember a private github you cant find unless asked for as "public". If you compile it and release it somewhere then maybe you have ground.
Also you cant detect c++, it doesnt even interact with lua. If they know what they're doing, you cant do shit. Dont bring up stupid shit. As well in my readme, i already state it detects a vast majority of all cheats, but not all of them.
Stop implying I am claiming "it detects everything!!"
It's incredibly stupid and im glad you like to make yourself look stupid[/QUOTE]
No, but technically you should be able to collect garbage, and check that against what the value SHOULD be before in init.lua (before anything is loaded, to see if they have load priority, and somethings already loaded) it's how I did it in GM12.
It did have inconsistencies on MAC/LINUX, but once you got the values for those it was smooth sailing..
If i even remember what i was talking about.
[QUOTE=zerothefallen;42988992]Incorrect. Your cheat is detected. Your loader is not. Your "cheat" isnt public either (i dont remember a private github you cant find unless asked for as "public". If you compile it and release it somewhere then maybe you have ground.
Also you cant detect c++, it doesnt even interact with lua. If they know what they're doing, you cant do shit. Dont bring up stupid shit. As well in my readme, i already state it detects a vast majority of all cheats, but not all of them.
Stop implying I am claiming "it detects everything!!"
It's incredibly stupid and im glad you like to make yourself look stupid[/QUOTE]
QAC [url=https://github.com/oubliette32/oubhack_v3l/blob/master/lua/client/oubhack_v3l.lua#L4230]does not detect[/url] my cheat and it has been public for [url=http://puu.sh/5u4ER.png]around 4 months[/url].
I'm going to stop here, as this is not the place to discuss this. If you don't want to accept you sound like a stuck up twat by saying "I can detect every public cheat" then so be it.
[QUOTE=>>oubliette<<;42989207]QAC [url=https://github.com/oubliette32/oubhack_v3l/blob/master/lua/client/oubhack_v3l.lua#L4230]does not detect[/url] my cheat and it has been public for [url=http://puu.sh/5u4ER.png]around 4 months[/url].
I'm going to stop here, as this is not the place to discuss this. If you don't want to accept you sound like a stuck up twat by saying "I can detect every public cheat" then so be it.[/QUOTE]
It does. I've already dl'd the damn cheat and tested it, it was even detected on the first version of QAC which was 100 lines (nice cheat)
You say I'm "stuck up" and shit yet I already stated that I worded it in the exact way I want it.
Can I detect it? Yes
Will I? No, no one uses your shit, if someone actually requests this and has basis, then I'll actually do so.
Did I ever state "I detect or will detect every single pub cheat out there?" No, I did not. I can if I want.
Like I said, you don't know how to read, nor does your piece of shit cheat get around anything. I thought HeX already made this clear to you. Stop arguing semantics.
PS: This is a SOLD add-on, I'm not going to write "it detects a few cheats or I cant detect everything, and is easy to get around."
GREAT for sales isnt it? It's almost as if you're suppose to avoid saying possibly negative sentences when marketing?????
ps, nice update "added one hour ago" update to get around qac. ty for provin' my point
[editline]26th November 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=Phoenixf129;42989175]No, but technically you should be able to collect garbage, and check that against what the value SHOULD be before in init.lua (before anything is loaded, to see if they have load priority, and somethings already loaded) it's how I did it in GM12.
It did have inconsistencies on MAC/LINUX, but once you got the values for those it was smooth sailing..
If i even remember what i was talking about.[/QUOTE]
I understand what you're talking bout, and I'm reworking most of QAC that I find derp.
Would be nice to add a "Bug Report" tab for scripts purchasers so that they can report bugs and sorted by their downloaded version. This would be private for the developer and the purchasers.
[QUOTE=CrashLemon;42989514]_Undefine, you should add a "Bug Report" tab for scripts purchasers so that they can report bugs depending on the current version they own of the script. This would be private for the developer and the purchasers.[/QUOTE]
that would be great.
Yeah, and it'd generally clean up the comments too. +1 to that.
99% of bug reports would be people unable to install their addons correctly.
[QUOTE=CrashLemon;42989514]Would be nice to add a "Bug Report" tab for scripts purchasers so that they can report bugs and sorted by their downloaded version. This would be private for the developer and the purchasers.[/QUOTE]
Pretty good idea. Then allow developers to mark bug reports as "Fixed" or "Sorted".
[QUOTE=EvacX;42989931]99% of bug reports would be people unable to install their addons correctly.[/QUOTE]
it's probably worth it to have people reporting issues than not at all.
[QUOTE=Crap-Head;42990006]Pretty good idea. Then allow developers to mark bug reports as "Fixed" or "Sorted".[/QUOTE]
Something like this:
[IMG]http://puu.sh/5u9ij.png[/IMG]
But with Github integration and it's issue tracker I don't think it's needed?
[QUOTE=EvacX;42989931]99% of bug reports would be people unable to install their addons correctly.[/QUOTE]
Well, most people (not me) make their scripts in form of addon so its only extract -> paste to addons folder -> config.
But I do agree with you as most people can't even do such thing.
[QUOTE=Netheous;42990206]Well, most people (not me) make their scripts in form of addon so its only extract -> paste to addons folder -> config.
But I do agree with you as most people can't even do such thing.[/QUOTE]
one of my customers still couldn't figure that out so honestly I don't know what to expect anymore.
[QUOTE=Netheous;42990206]Well, most people (not me) make their scripts in form of addon so its only extract -> paste to addons folder -> config.
But I do agree with you as most people can't even do such thing.[/QUOTE]
That's 3 steps too many in the minds of half my customer base. :v:
[editline]26th November 2013[/editline]
Okay that's an exaggeration, but I have had people who haven't been able to manage that.
I've had to resort to babylon translator before when some random guy started typing to me in mandarin.
Does it not make sense to talk in english, when the website is also... in english?
Well, that was a fun hour at least....
[editline]26th November 2013[/editline]
Especially when he got it from a leak, which i shortly found out later, which is stupid.
Why would you ask the developer to support you, when you aren't supporting them by blowing them off with a leaked copy?
A french guy added me a while ago because he couldn't install my addon.
And I had to spend 4-5 hours trying to figure out what he wants.
[QUOTE=Netheous;42990206]Well, most people (not me) make their scripts in form of addon so its only extract -> paste to addons folder -> config.
But I do agree with you as most people can't even do such thing.[/QUOTE]
The same sort of people who make a facepunch thread asking for help to install a map ^_^
[QUOTE=CM Punk;42991090]The same sort of people who make a facepunch thread asking for help to install a map ^_^[/QUOTE]
...in the wrong subforum.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
