[QUOTE=Willox;43026033]Obviously having "Gears Gaming" written the model isn't equal to what other people are saying, it's literally a name that means nothing to most people without any other context. Although, it is obvious why customers wouldn't want it on their servers so I think it'd be a nice idea to remove it. You've said yourself how easy it would be to do, but you shouldn't expect customers to want to have to do that.[/QUOTE]
I didn't previously think of it as anything more than a subtle reference.
[QUOTE=EvacX;43026051]I didn't previously think of it as anything more than a subtle reference.[/QUOTE]
Oh, ffs.
Just remove it and stop this drama.
[QUOTE=Netheous;43026063]Oh, ffs.
Just remove it and stop this drama.[/QUOTE]
What drama?
[editline]30th November 2013[/editline]
Did it just suddenly get illegal to discuss things on a forum? I've admitted that it might be a bigger deal than what I previously thought it was yet you're continuing to stir up shit and frankly [i]causing[/i] drama when there really is no drama to be had.
People gave me their opinion on the subject and I did consider them and I am going to remove it, that's how feedback and discussion works.
[QUOTE=EvacX;43026087]What drama?
[editline]30th November 2013[/editline]
Did it just suddenly get illegal to discuss things on a forum? I've admitted that it might be a bigger deal than what I previously thought it was yet you're continuing to stir up shit and frankly [i]causing[/i] drama when there really is no drama to be had.
People gave me their opinion on the subject and I did consider them and I am going to remove it, that's how feedback and discussion works.[/QUOTE]
I don't really want to argue with you, but if you took the feedback in the first place, this conversation would end in 2-3 posts, not 20
[QUOTE=Netheous;43026122]I don't really want to argue with you, but if you took the feedback in the first place, this conversation would end in 2-3 posts, not 20[/QUOTE]
Because I am just going to blindly do what people tell me to without discussing it first? No, I'm not. What the fuck is the problem with a few people posting their opinions on some things on a fucking forum that's relevant to the topic? Isn't that what this is for or am I entirely wrong?
It's not "illegal" to discuss these things. That'd be retarded.
I'm just going to ask you nicely to move on from this. It is a mere request, but if you continue to go on and on about this, feel free, as long as you don't break the rules.
Evac, could you just shut up already?
And what's with saying "fuck" and "fucking" in every of your sentences. You either remove the damn text, or leave it there and have people continuously bug you about it. You don't have to start up a discussion for your script. This thread is not for your personal expressions of how you want to brand your community in your scripts.
If you want a solo thread for your argues to argue about this, start one in the CoderHire forums. This thread is for quick questions and other things that is just solved with a few replies.
[QUOTE=Crap-Head;43026182]EAnd what's with saying "fuck" and "fucking" in every of your sentences[/QUOTE]
Because it was annoying me how everyone got pissed at a tiny worthless discussion.
But alright, it's over.
Just move on
Please stop arguing in the thread.
Take it to PMs / Steam.
[QUOTE=FPtje;43024953]I'm getting e-mails about people having their servers hacked. I want to know exactly which addons you have sold/released with this exploit. I also want to know what name you have as author in the addon.txt files of these addons.
Also, _Undefined had better closely examine your current coderhire scripts. How the fuck are you even a trusted coder?[/QUOTE]
hahahahahahaha.
I don't think you get what happened. go read past threads.
[QUOTE=BoowmanTech;43015015][t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16648713/Untitled.png[/t]
Ok????[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=EvacX;43025086][t]http://puu.sh/5xAQ7.png[/t]
fdasfdsagfds sorry for not including automatic texturing software with my addon
This is how it looks by the way:
...
[editline]30th November 2013[/editline]
or you could just bloody ask how to do it[/QUOTE]
Has this site seriously gone so bad that scripters on it complain about getting [i]four[/i] out of five stars? Really?
That's terrible, haha :v:
[QUOTE=FPtje;43028133]Has this site seriously gone so bad that scripters on it complain about getting [i]four[/i] out of five stars? Really?
That's terrible, haha :v:[/QUOTE]
even 1 star can mean something since it's a script
If it doesnt do exactly what it says, it's not a 5/5
If it does exactly what it says, it's a 5/5.
Anything less than 5/5 is an insult to your code and 95% of the time, from my view, It's people being retards.
[QUOTE=FPtje;43028133]Has this site seriously gone so bad that scripters on it complain about getting [i]four[/i] out of five stars? Really?
That's terrible, haha :v:[/QUOTE]
It's the fact that people give four-out-of-five star ratings without saying why or for ridiculous reasons.
[QUOTE=FPtje;43028133]Has this site seriously gone so bad that scripters on it complain about getting [i]four[/i] out of five stars? Really?
That's terrible, haha :v:[/QUOTE]
It's not the rating, it's the reasoning behind it.
Out of nowhere, some guy talked to me saying that there is a guy using leaked scripts.
So I went onto his server to investigate and here is the result:
Server owner: [url]http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198040724071[/url]
Proof: [img_thumb]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4764969/dre.PNG[/img_thumb]
If you want to check if the guy uses anything else, feel free to join the server visible in the screenshot
This is another server using leaked scripts, a bunch of them.
Server Owner: Kurtis Axl [url]http://steamcommunity.com/id/kurtisaxl[/url]
Proof:
[url]http://i.imgur.com/DlgLoTw.jpg[/url]
[url]http://i.imgur.com/gFcoRDb.jpg[/url]
[url]http://i.imgur.com/x1sGrP8.jpg[/url]
[url]http://i.imgur.com/3u2fDDN.jpg[/url]
Netheous already confirmed that the owner of the community did not purchase his stuff. I'm assuming the other 10 scripts from coderhire they're using is leaked copies.
[QUOTE=koz;43031115]This is another server using leaked scripts, a bunch of them.
Server Owner: Kurtis Axl [url]http://steamcommunity.com/id/kurtisaxl[/url]
Proof: [url]http://i.imgur.com/DlgLoTw.jpg[/url] [url]http://i.imgur.com/gFcoRDb.jpg[/url]
Netheous already confirmed that the owner of the community did not purchase his stuff. I'm assuming the other 10 scripts from coderhire they're using is leaked copies.[/QUOTE]
Even more funny, the server owner was telling all the admins he made the scripts he uses and told them that he got model for my weed plant from there: [url]http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=151259497[/url]
[QUOTE=Netheous;43031124]Even more funny, the server owner was telling all the admins he made the scripts he uses and told them that he got model for my weed plant from there: [url]http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=151259497[/url][/QUOTE]
That's ridiculous, some people are really dumb. I hate it the most when people have the audacity to get support from you when they downloaded a leaked version of your addon.
Is it just me or is scrips being leaked going to get out of hand to the point where no one is going to know who is leaking the scripts!
[QUOTE=nickster50;43033582]Is it just me or is scrips being leaked going to get out of hand to the point where no one is going to know who is leaking the scripts![/QUOTE]
Tbh, it happens to all things digital. It was going to happen no matter what.
[QUOTE=zerothefallen;43028185]
Anything less than 5/5 is an insult to your code and 95% of the time, from my view, It's people being retards.[/QUOTE]
People have different standards for ratings. Some people think things that work as they advertise without problems means five stars.
Other people reserve the five star rating for the "absolute best thing they've ever seen".
And then even other people rate a script on how good it is relative to the other scripts they've bought.
From the first perspective, a good working HUD recoloring should receive five stars. From the second perspective, there might be a certain color pattern that could be a bit better, or it might lack "oomph" as some people say. They'll say it's a good HUD, but they'll still rate four stars, with or without saying why.
They don't know that you guys expect them to give an explanation as to why they didn't give the fifth star. You simply cannot expect them to know. It's a simple rating system, not an extensive IGN review. Buyers assume the rating system to be like any other, where they are free to give their opinion and rating without the developers [i]bitching[/i] about their rating choice.
If you want to force your rating standard upon people, you should put it in the rules of the site. You can also show a little warning above the review panel saying "please provide a detailed explanation as to why you did not rate five stars" when people select anything but 5 stars. If that sounds forceful it's exactly because it is.
I'm sorry maybe it's just me who runs into all the annoying script moderators on coderhire.com but seriously [B]do your staff even think about what they pass and what they don't?[/B] I'm now dealing with some retard repeatedly rejecting my script because it was "rejected before" if he took a few seconds to actually check he would see it was rejected the reasons for it's initial rejection no longer apply and furthermore it was actually one of the two scripts the rejections of which I complained about in my last complaint regarding the professionalism of your staff.
You guys might want to considder an IQ test (among other things) for your moderators... I mean seriously this is just ridiculously retarded. I can't even get a concrete reason for rejection out of him just repeatedly "same as before."
[B]I would welcome any acceptable alternative to this site, as far as I can tell it is plagued by unprofessional staff[/B] who simply do not understand how to use a business tone in writing, how to properly work with paying customers, or a multitude of other general management issues. I find it honestly just [B]pathetic that you can't find people better than your current administration.[/B]
Once again, maybe it's just me, but I continually have problems with inprofessional staff on your site and just find it generally[B] frustrating to deal with a "professional website"[/B] run by some seriously [B]shady feeling staff[/B]. I'm gradually starting to feel like coderhire.com isn't a legitimate business and furthermore that it might be a good idea for someone to open more respectable and legitimate competition to it.
Lastly, it should be noted before you guys write this off as "some retarded and dejected skiddy bitching" the script in question is, as last time I complained about the retarded staff on your site, one which users have seen and requested so I don't entirely understand why you guys wont let me post a script that has established interest even before submission. For further verification of my credibility as an actually respectable coder not just some skiddy you can see my F4menu which was very well received with 26 purchases at $15 each (and the demo video of which is actually where most of the requests for the mod i just posted and had rejected came from)
Get your shit together coderhire, when you're dealing with money in the 100k+ range people have the right to expect some level of professional management, the experience I've had with you guys is one I would never expect to have with any web based sales site and [B]especially not as a paying subscriber.[/B]
Now to wait what will probably take a few days of resubmitting the script to use a tiny one line text-box to explain the problem this post is dedicated to.
[B]My Suggestions:[/B]
People are paying for subscriptions to post their scripts. It is the very least you can do to actually work with those paying you to help them improve their content and actually get it posted on your site. Right now it almost feels like its us vs the moderators as we struggle to get our scripts past the big bad wolves.
This is just rediculous especially if we are paying for the "privilege" of posting our scripts. I think we, as paying customers, have a certain right to expect that we will recieve some level of actually understanding support, staff willing to take more than 15 seconds to look at a script and write a 5 word "damn dis sux" type message for why it was rejected. If your staff reject a script have them type out a detailed reason as to why, and what users can do to fix it. If this costs more in terms of effort then charge more I think many would be willing to pay a bit extra considering how profitable it can be. We want to feel like the staff are on our side as the sellers, not against us.
[B]It almost feels like your staff operate on a "sux until proven good" basis when approving scripts. Create some system by which staff and developers can have dialogues about getting their scripts through the approval process in a CONSTRUCTIVE manor. Don't just tell us "our shit sux so gtfo" which is essentially the attitude I feel from much of your staff.[/B]
If we are paying for your service, we have the right to expect some level of investigation on the part of moderators not a mine-field of instant rejects for minor issues and being forced to wait days to resubmit.
It's me you were dealing with, not any of the other staff. You've posted the same code twice, 3 weeks apart. You made no changes at all. As far as I can see, you were hoping to get around the fact it was denied 3 weeks ago by resubmitting it now.
This is a hobby, not a business. I don't mind refunding your developer subscription if you don't like how I run it.
[QUOTE=_Undefined;43034622]It's me you were dealing with, not any of the other staff. You've posted the same code twice, 3 weeks apart. You made no changes at all. As far as I can see, you were hoping to get around the fact it was denied 3 weeks ago by resubmitting it now.
This is a hobby, not a business. I don't mind refunding your developer subscription if you don't like how I run it.[/QUOTE]
Well now I know where the staff problem comes from. I will not request a refund and will infact be forced to continue using your service for lack of an alternative though I do feel your system has serious problems as does your review process apparently.
Though your response does counter a number of my points the point remains that I have had requests for this script and am yet unable to post it. Is simple demand not your criteria for actually accepting a script? Could you actually give me a reason as to why it is being denied?
If it's too short then how are scripts like ULX Essentials any better?
If it's fugly can I please turn your attention to the "custom admin mod" script submitted a few weeks ago that was so bad it was reported by enough users to get it removed AND it had a 5 sentence description with no markdown formatting nor any actual details regarding the scripts functioning, yet it was passed.
[B]Please provide an actual valid reason as to why you are refusing to post my script and I will rest my argument, but thus far I simply do not see any reason why my script should be rejected, especially when compared to numerous other scripts which you have accepted.
All I ask for is a reason as to why it has been rejected describing some actual fault in the script not simply "just cuz"[/B]
[B]I'm not some pre-pubescent skiddy trying to use human manipulation to get around a rejected script as you seem inclined to assume (and thus write off my complaint as another dejected skiddy), if there is a valid reason I want to know and fix it, if not then I want you to explain why exactly it hasn't been approved, but in any case there is no reason I should be unable to get this script approved by improving it to your satisfaction or convincing you that it is satisfactory in it's present state.[/B]
_Undefined, just a question. Do you impose some sort of price restriction on people's addons (in the sense that if you consider the price to be unfair for the content) or are they completely free to price it as they want?
[QUOTE=EvacX;43034647]_Undefined, just a question. Do you impose some sort of price restriction on people's addons (in the sense that if you consider the price to be unfair for the content) or are they completely free to price it as they want?[/QUOTE]
I don't impose any sort of pricing rules.
It might just be me, but when hitting the scrips tab and then selecting an option (e.g TTT), it takes ages for it to load.
[QUOTE=smithy285;43034759]It might just be me, but when hitting the scrips tab and then selecting an option (e.g TTT), it takes ages for it to load.[/QUOTE]
Happens for me too.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
