Damn I saved the uhm [sp]"info" that got the the last thread deleted, that means some of this info has to be correct[/sp]
This is really great now please lets contact IW and get them to fix this horrible problem, honestly if we all emailed them, maybe we'd get something done.
Don't ban me this is IW dox strictly for nice emails, letters, phonecalls. Not my fault if one of you can't keep your temper down
Email: [EMAIL="info@infinityward.com"]info@infinityward.com[/EMAIL]
15821 Ventura Boulevard Suite 590
Encino, CA 91436
USA
+1.818.386.0072
[QUOTE=Bomimo;36097535]Age-limit varies regionally.[/QUOTE]
Fine.
REMEMBER KIDS! ONLY RUIN PEOPLES LIVES IF THEY ARE OVER THE AGE OF 18/21/WHATEVERYOURCOUNTRYDEEMSWHATAGEAADULTIS
[editline]27th May 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=bluesky;36097552]Damn I saved the uhm [sp]"info" that got the the last thread deleted, that means some of this info has to be correct[/sp]
This is really great now please lets contact IW and get them to fix this horrible problem, honestly if we all emailed them, maybe we'd get something done.
Don't ban me this is IW dox strictly for nice emails, letters, phonecalls. Not my fault if one of you can't keep your temper down
Email: [EMAIL="info@infinityward.com"]info@infinityward.com[/EMAIL]
15821 Ventura Boulevard Suite 590
Encino, CA 91436
USA
+1.818.386.0072[/QUOTE]
Only way they will listen is if there is alot of bad publicity coming their way.
[QUOTE=bluesky;36097552]Damn I saved the uhm [sp]"info" that got the the last thread deleted, that means some of this info has to be correct[/sp]
This is really great now please lets contact IW and get them to fix this horrible problem, honestly if we all emailed them, maybe we'd get something done.
Don't ban me this is IW dox strictly for nice emails, letters, phonecalls. Not my fault if one of you can't keep your temper down
Email: [EMAIL="info@infinityward.com"]info@infinityward.com[/EMAIL]
15821 Ventura Boulevard Suite 590
Encino, CA 91436
USA
+1.818.386.0072[/QUOTE]
IW won't (and can't) do anything.
This is such a deep flaw in the COD4 protocol that fixing it would literally break everything.
[editline]27th May 2012[/editline]
ie. it's not something that could be easily patched in any one place
Uh guys, it's one thing to spam the source around to taunt Seth and get anti-cheats working, but it's another to compile it and start using it. I have a feeling there's gonna be a huge spike in cheaters.cfg names
[QUOTE=Ericson666;36097598]Uh guys, it's one thing to spam the source around to taunt Seth and get anti-cheats working, but it's another to compile it and start using it. I have a feeling there's gonna be a huge spike in cheaters.cfg names[/QUOTE]
good
[QUOTE=Ericson666;36097598]Uh guys, it's one thing to spam the source around to taunt Seth and get anti-cheats working, but it's another to compile it and start using it. I have a feeling there's gonna be a huge spike in cheaters.cfg names[/QUOTE]
Does it look like we care? It is a sandbox game and there isnt a reason to use the stuff. Let them waste the 10 bucks on it.
[editline]27th May 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=swift and shift;36097579]IW won't (and can't) do anything.
This is such a deep flaw in the COD4 protocol that fixing it would literally break everything.
[editline]27th May 2012[/editline]
ie. it's not something that could be easily patched in any one place[/QUOTE]
Bad publicity and lawsuits can totally make unfixable things be fixed very quickly. Especially when you have a massive company and a office full of code monkeys who are doing the work.
snip
[QUOTE=Ericson666;36097598]Uh guys, it's one thing to spam the source around to taunt Seth and get anti-cheats working, but it's another to compile it and start using it. I have a feeling there's gonna be a huge spike in cheaters.cfg names[/QUOTE]
You wont get added to cheaters.cfg for using the verison(s) posted in here, it doesn't bypass ScriptEnforcer so it's just like any other Lua hack.
[QUOTE=Drakehawke;36097736]You wont get added to cheaters.cfg for using the verison(s) posted in here, it doesn't bypass ScriptEnforcer so it's just like any other Lua hack.[/QUOTE]
Oh.
Well still don't use it people. (Don't) do it for the children!
I think what seth did is a good thing, he should be hired, it'd build up immunity to the hacks/bugs you can cause to Garry's Mod.
EDIT: Disagree/rate me dumb/or funny if you disagree on this though. Silly me. :tinfoil:
[QUOTE=swift and shift;36097579]IW won't (and can't) do anything.
This is such a deep flaw in the COD4 protocol that fixing it would literally break everything.
[editline]27th May 2012[/editline]
ie. it's not something that could be easily patched in any one place[/QUOTE]
also note they rarely patch old games
[QUOTE=Drakehawke;36097736]You wont get added to cheaters.cfg for using the verison(s) posted in here, it doesn't bypass ScriptEnforcer so it's just like any other Lua hack.[/QUOTE]
Indeed you shouldn't, and I hope I don't as I used this version to test a few anti cheat setups I had/have.
[editline]27th May 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Crap-Head;36097198]
[quote]
I tested it on a server I run that does not use SE at the moment, and it works fine.
I've not tested it on a server with script enforcer, but I can't see why it would run on one.
[TABLE="width: 363"]
[TR]
[TD="class: gutter"]1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17[/TD]
[TD="class: code"]if CLIENT then
local i = 1;
local up,val = debug.getupvalue( hook.Call, i );
local t = {};
while ( up != nil ) do
t[up] = val;
i = i + 1;
up, val = debug.getupvalue( hook.Call, i );
end
if t["SH"] then
timer.Create("shwhore", 1, 0, function()
MsgN( "Moron..." );
RunConsoleCommand[[kill]]
end)
end
end
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
One of the detection methods someone posted.
[/quote]
Tested on a server with SE on, works perfectly.[/QUOTE]
Someone just made a support ticket on my servers, so maybe it has some false posatives or just a really stupid hacker.
[URL]http://www.bybservers.co.uk/gmod/index.php?action=helpdesk;sa=ticket;ticket=5554[/URL]
I guess another addon could use a global variable SH though.
[editline]27th May 2012[/editline]
Edit -
Also, stop with the CoD4 thing. I very much doubt CoD4 is the main issue when ddosing a website like facepunch. Also, IW could fix it and have had multiple fixes sent to them. The main one being a small server side code change to limit the amount of requests a specific ip can receive from the server for a set time interval.
The main hits to hurt a web domain would be shells/multiple drdos forms/syn flood and slowloris maybe. A fair few simple booters over at hackforums have started selling slowloris hits.
[QUOTE=digigamer17;36097837]I think what seth did is a good thing, he should be hired, it'd build up immunity to the hacks/bugs you can cause to Garry's Mod.
EDIT: Disagree/rate me dumb/or funny if you disagree on this though. Silly me. :tinfoil:[/QUOTE]
Yes, let's let the hacker who allowed many users to grief and DOS many servers with a third party program directly into the staff giving him access to the servers and community!
That is literally the worst idea ever.
[QUOTE=digigamer17;36097837]I think what seth did is a good thing, he should be hired, it'd build up immunity to the hacks/bugs you can cause to Garry's Mod.
EDIT: Disagree/rate me dumb/or funny if you disagree on this though. Silly me. :tinfoil:[/QUOTE]
Really stupid idea.
[QUOTE=fruxodaily;36097879]also note they rarely patch old games[/QUOTE]
Patching games doesn't make any sense either way. Why spend money on doing that when you can spend then on making the same game again and selling it for dosh.
[url]http://www.darkfolf.net/ohyes.txt[/url]
Here's another one if you're looking for it.
But won't those antihacks not working anymore when some names of the globals and variables are changed or masked as Wiremod stuff something? I guess Seth is going to make a new version of his crap and that mess starts all over again.
[QUOTE=Leader of Me;36097934]Really stupid idea.[/QUOTE]
Sorry.
[QUOTE=Grocel;36098271]But won't those antihacks not working anymore when some names of the globals and variables are changed or masked as Wiremod stuff something? I guess Seth is going to make a new version of his crap and that mess starts all over again.[/QUOTE]
Well hopefully since Garry apparently has Seth's info there won't be any more..
oh, hello new thread.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnrKp3ZY9xY[/media]
reposting because why not
also was the cloudflare ddos protection thing removed? my browser wasn't checked coming in
[QUOTE=Ericson666;36097598]Uh guys, it's one thing to spam the source around to taunt Seth and get anti-cheats working, but it's another to compile it and start using it. I have a feeling there's gonna be a huge spike in cheaters.cfg names[/QUOTE]
You're silly, the LUA code which was leaked can not get you banned from Garry or VAC as it doesn't use a DLL. However, if you use the original sethhack which is loaded via a module aka injected, you will get caught.
[QUOTE=cebceb44;36098553]oh, hello new thread.
also was the cloudflare ddos protection thing removed? my browser wasn't checked coming in[/QUOTE]
Probably turned it off when the attacks stopped, saves you having to wait a few seconds for it to check you before viewing anything.
[QUOTE=Ruzza;36098645]You're silly, the LUA code which was leaked can not get you banned from Garry or VAC as it doesn't use a DLL. However, if you use the original sethhack which is loaded via a module aka injected, you will get caught.[/QUOTE]
Lua-based script enforcer disablers CAN get you banned by Garry's system.
That's the whole fucking point of it, as Garry already flagged some modules as cheats for VAC before.
[QUOTE=Legend286;36098678]Lua-based script enforcer disablers CAN get you banned by Garry's system.[/QUOTE]
Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think you can bypass scriptenforcer with Lua? (other than pp_pixelrender)
[QUOTE=Drakehawke;36098690]Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think you can bypass scriptenforcer with Lua? (other than pp_pixelrender)[/QUOTE]
Anything is possible if you know how.
I'm just going from experience, I know several people who have done it on the gmod 13 beta - which as far as I know cannot load custom dll modules.
[QUOTE=Legend286;36098705]Anything is possible if you know how.[/QUOTE]
[del]And do you know how?[/del]
Yeah, it was possible on the beta due to an exploit in the menus HTML I think, it was reported to garry though so I assume he fixed it.
[QUOTE=Legend286;36098705]Anything is possible if you know how.
I'm just going from experience, I know several people who have done it on the gmod 13 beta - which as far as I know cannot load custom dll modules.[/QUOTE]
Scriptenforcer isn't working at all on gmod13 (well, for me). It blocked net, umsg, glon and other libraries on my server
[QUOTE=Drakehawke;36098717][del]And do you know how?[/del]
Yeah, it was possible on the beta due to an exploit in the menus HTML I think, it was reported to garry though so I assume he fixed it.[/QUOTE]
It was quite early on.
And I could probably think of a few ways to bypass SE, but I don't even play GMod let alone have the time to waste fiddling around with Lua.
Bypassing SE aka by overriding the functions in C++ nothing else will get you banned.
