Does nobody notice that there IS a keyboard for xbox 360? - Garry's Mod

[QUOTE=AnEvilGuy;18339229]PS3 fanboy, with your language... you sound like a 8 year old kid and your mom probably got your PS3 for you I bet. But here you go, straight up console specs: PS3 Single Core 3.2 Ghz Processor with 7 other cores that do simple task and run the OS and such. 256MB of RAM Nvidia 7800 256mb Graphics card Xbox 360 Triple Core 3.2 Ghz Processor ATI Xenos 512 MB Graphics Card 512MB RAM So... hardware wise the Xbox 360 is twice as good as the PS3... but both suck compared to a decent PC. And don't call me fanboy... as I hate consoles as they drag down PC game development because the games have to be downgraded to fit console specs.[/QUOTE] You obviously don't understand a single thing you just said. At least know hardware before trying to compare them. Clock counts for shit when there are more cores, the 360 is a tri-cell PowerPC core, very old architecture, but very well known and can be powerful, the PS3 is a whole new architecture, the Cell, 8 cores, 1 of which is redundant I think. The Cell overall has more power than the 360's PowerPC core. Each core of the Cell is dedicated to specific tasks, but can share the load with others, the PPC in the 360 is just general processing, with other cores there to help spread load. RAM wise, the PS3 uses a obscure type if I remember correctly, there may not be much, but it's a fairly fast speed, with fairly low latencies, the RAM in the 360 on the other hand is a more common type, and there may be more, but it really doesn't make that much of a difference, the extra is used to share resources with other system components, the PS3 has dedicated memory for each part if I remember correctly. GPU wise it's near fucking impossible to compare them, the Cell does most of the GPU processing on the PS3 so the GPU is hardly used enough, its there to help more with certain aspects than pure rendering. The 360 uses a GPU which cannot be easily compared to others on the market, but most of the rendering is done on that, besides, barely any games make full use of either of them, so it's hard to compare. So for future reference kids, higher clock != better part, you could overclock a Pentium 4 to 3.5 GHz and a core i7 at 2.5 (why that low I'm not sure) would still be a massive increase over it. The number of cores and the manufacturing process counts a hell of a lot towards power, clock is merely a reference to how many instructions a single core on it can perform, not the chip overall. (don't multiply cores by clock either, it doesn't work like that)

[QUOTE=AnEvilGuy;18339229]PS3 fanboy, with your language... you sound like a 8 year old kid and your mom probably got your PS3 for you I bet. But here you go, straight up console specs: PS3 Single Core 3.2 Ghz Processor with 7 other cores that do simple task and run the OS and such. 256MB of RAM Nvidia 7800 256mb Graphics card Xbox 360 Triple Core 3.2 Ghz Processor ATI Xenos 512 MB Graphics Card 512MB RAM So... hardware wise the Xbox 360 is twice as good as the PS3... but both suck compared to a decent PC. And don't call me fanboy... as I hate consoles as they drag down PC game development because the games have to be downgraded to fit console specs.[/QUOTE] Except for the fact that the Xbox 360 does not have 512MB of ram in both the graphics and the system. It has 512MB of GDDR3 for the system itself then the ATi graphics have 10MB of embedded DRAM. So a total of 522MB of memory if you want to be exact. Don't believe me? Try Google. Technically, the PS3 is arguably a little better than the 360 but they're on par with each other. And it's no use arguing about which one is better when both systems are terrible at running any decent game above 720p, if you're looking for graphics buy a computer.

Derail

[QUOTE=AnEvilGuy;18339229]And don't call me fanboy... as I hate consoles as they drag down PC game development because the games have to be downgraded to fit console specs.[/QUOTE] That's actually a good thing. Few people has the financial background to buy a completely new case every other year.

So, in conclusion, GMod is Mt. Rushmore

[QUOTE=DiscoBiscut;18365604]So, in conclusion, GMod is Mt. Rushmore[/QUOTE] yep, cuz mount rushmore had minges and wire contraptions

You can't make a mod for a console.

[QUOTE=ConkerBirdy;18391051]yep, cuz mount rushmore had minges and wire contraptions[/QUOTE] No, lots of explosions and not many people outside of those making it wanting to see it.

This Thread has gone Downhill, IT WONT HAPPEN

[QUOTE=hottshot3312;17560332]You should stop kissing garry's ass and just buy gmod for the pc. Most computers can run it.[/QUOTE] My friend Rex ran it with 256mb of RAM and an integrated graphics card from the 90's. With no numpad, because it was a laptop. So I don't wanna hear anyone bitching about the requirements.

[QUOTE=AnEvilGuy;18339229]PS3 fanboy, with your language... you sound like a 8 year old kid and your mom probably got your PS3 for you I bet. But here you go, straight up console specs: PS3 Single Core 3.2 Ghz Processor with 7 other cores that do simple task and run the OS and such. 256MB of RAM Nvidia 7800 256mb Graphics card Xbox 360 Triple Core 3.2 Ghz Processor ATI Xenos 512 MB Graphics Card 512MB RAM So... hardware wise the Xbox 360 is twice as good as the PS3... but both suck compared to a decent PC. And don't call me fanboy... as I hate consoles as they drag down PC game development because the games have to be downgraded to fit console specs.[/QUOTE] But the 360 has RRoD, that pretty much outweighs it's "pros". [b][i]Oops, looks like someone just leveled the playing field![/i][/b] [img]http://www.cubeupload.com/files/fb9a00playingfield.jpg[/img]

I have the RROD, :( Id still rather a 360, at least its getting updated.

Stop derailing this thread, Get back to calling the OP an idiot.

I will start again. [img]http://www.nightbiscuit.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/derp.jpg[/img]

[QUOTE=hottshot3312;17560332]You should stop kissing garry's ass and just buy gmod for the pc. Most computers can run it.[/QUOTE] WRONG all can but some cant run it efficently

[QUOTE=thermal;18424959]I will start again. [img]http://www.nightbiscuit.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/derp.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] I don't get it. Also,OP got ten thousand dumboxes. [editline]10:40AM[/editline] [QUOTE=ZestyLemons;18391269]You can't make a mod for a console.[/QUOTE] What about the PS3 version of UT3,huh?You can use mods on it legally. And all those halo 3 mods,are they not on a console?