[QUOTE=SashaWolf;41308413]In this case, when I say bypass, I mean that you cannot see anything that my hack draws on the screen, with my chams being the sole exception. If I've been able to figure out how to do it, I'm sure others can as well.[/QUOTE]
So... then we still end up banning you for hacking? If you don't send one, or you send a bogus one, I'm pretty sure any sane individual would be able to tell you've bypassed the script somehow and know to ban you. So your point is?
[QUOTE=SashaWolf;41307474]I don't think you can run modules on the client, if that's what you're saying in this.
[editline]4th July 2013[/editline]
Weren't you in several of the threads where working code was released? Check the anticheat thread from awhile ago, there was like three pages of people talking about it.[/QUOTE]
Forgot about that thread, but I did reply there yes. I'll go take a peak at it sometime today.
[QUOTE=Crashdoom;41312242]So... then we still end up banning you for hacking? If you don't send one, or you send a bogus one, I'm pretty sure any sane individual would be able to tell you've bypassed the script somehow and know to ban you. So your point is?[/QUOTE]
it's simple to either detour render.capture and return bullshit which will get said person banned anyways
OR you could make it so ESP and ETC is toggled off for the screenshot frame.
which doing the above makes it useless
[QUOTE=zerothefallen;41317923]it's simple to either detour render.capture and return bullshit which will get said person banned anyways
OR you could make it so ESP and ETC is toggled off for the screenshot frame.
which doing the above makes it useless[/QUOTE]
To be frank, the former is what I expect to typically happen. Anyone that would create a mainstream hack would typically not distribute it with a feature that would compensate for screenshot captures as this isn't common use. However, if someone actually bypasses it, having the knowledge and taking the time to do such on my little server, then I am actually quite honoured.
There's always someone better than you, so you just have to do your best. In this case, I've got systems to catch the petty hackers that we frequently get, someone will be able to bypass it, this much I know. :smile:
[QUOTE=Crashdoom;41319064]To be frank, the former is what I expect to typically happen. Anyone that would create a mainstream hack would typically not distribute it with a feature that would compensate for screenshot captures as this isn't common use. However, if someone actually bypasses it, having the knowledge and taking the time to do such on my little server, then I am actually quite honoured.
There's always someone better than you, so you just have to do your best. In this case, I've got systems to catch the petty hackers that we frequently get, someone will be able to bypass it, this much I know. :smile:[/QUOTE]
It didn't used to be maintstream a year or so ago. We had one in GM11-GM12 but it relied on a serverside dll file. They have now become much more popular and given the amount of servers that use this method I'm pretty sure I'd built it into a product I was selling, specially considering it's not hard to hide the features during the screenshot.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
