[QUOTE=TheMrFailz;51854554]Thanks for the excellent input. Unfortunately neither I nor Damnation were suggesting the mg's should be removed.
:vs:[/QUOTE]
The joke just flew over your head.
Additionally, I dont need [B]your[/B] permission to suggest something on the thread.
[QUOTE=Kardel;51854575]The joke just flew over your head.
Additionally, I dont need [B]your[/B] permission to suggest something on the thread.[/QUOTE]
I wasnt saying you needed permission. I was saying that you were suggesting that I wanted mgs nerfed to the point of being effectively removed since every time someone on fp says "we could just remove them", its in response to that.
[QUOTE=TheMrFailz;51854608]I wasnt saying you needed permission. I was saying that you were suggesting that I wanted mgs nerfed to the point of being effectively removed since every time someone on fp says "we could just remove them", its in response to that.[/QUOTE]
Still, the problem is that I was merely [B]joking[/B], and you got quite jumpy about it. I was refering to the Machineguns getting nerfed when they have very little use anyways. Its just plain stupid to think they won't just slap more machineguns on their shit to compensate for the nerf. And barring that, yeah, theyre pretty much useless when there are [I]300hp supersoldiers[/I] running in circles around your tank, and you have to admit thats quite comedic.
So like I said, the joke flew over your head. :vs:
Good update, Kyle did a really nice job on the RAC models.
Also the buff that came with racs and ALs seems pretty good, increases the pick rate for them as well making them a lot more useful.
Why worry about MG spam? Weren't they made originally to put a lot of lead down range to supress advancing [B]infantry[/B]. What im saying is they are fine to spam with infantry. Armored tanks that are imune to it however, your just lagging the server and being annoying shooting everyone's wheels off. Tanks only really should use them for range finding and killing infantry, shooting down planes, or damaging light armored vehicles.
[QUOTE=Damnation;51852663]ACF r573
-lot of good changes[/QUOTE]
finally. hopefully we will see new content coming soon
also, kardel, you could stop being a drama/shitposting queen, you're literally the only one to keep being contrarian to anything posted here
the only person whining and causing drama is you now
[QUOTE=Nesara;51855249]also, kardel, you could stop being a drama/shitposting queen, you're literally the only one to keep being contrarian to anything posted here[/QUOTE]
Nice buzzwords there, Timmy. You should probably read what I say before ridiculizing yourself like this.
So since you will probably not even read what I said before I'm going to make a little tl;dr for you: I made a joke and he went bananas about it. I am pretty sure as well if it was another person who made the joke that wasnt me we wouldn't be through all this... What's that word you like to use for it? "Drama". Probably there would be no "Drama" if you didn't start it, the only people that are "Dramatic" are these who said something you didn't like... Really makes you think.
[QUOTE=Kardel;51855564]Nice buzzwords there, Timmy. You should probably read what I say before ridiculizing yourself like this.
So since you will probably not even read what I said before I'm going to make a little tl;dr for you: I made a joke and he went bananas about it. I am pretty sure as well if it was another person who made the joke that wasnt me we wouldn't be through all this... What's that word you like to use for it? "Drama". Probably there would be no "Drama" if you didn't start it, the only people that are "Dramatic" are these who said something you didn't like... Really makes you think.[/QUOTE]
I didn't go bananas about it and I would reply if it was anyone else.
Thread pls go back to normalcy.
So something something someone asked me for a picture of models or something like that here you go my 0% progress due to college.
Meant to be a generic cannon model, it's dimensions were going to be based around 10.5cm Flak 38/10.5 cm SK C/33 and I was going to give it a generic breech and a bunch of bodygroups, that can wait.
[T]https://puu.sh/udKSH/976b3ae69f.png[/T]
[I]Poopy[/I]
[QUOTE=Damnation;51852663]
-Adjusted HMGs courtesy of Red
--Spread increased from 0.32 to 0.4
--20mm 160kg, RoF 675 r/m, 12 rounds, 8s reload, 40mm pen @ 850 m/s
--30mm 480kg, RoF 434 r/m, 10 rounds, 10s reload, 56mm pen @ 850 m/s
--40mm 740kg, RoF 380 r/m, 8 rounds, 13s reload, 69mm pen @ 850 m/s
[/QUOTE]
[I]thx for completely ruining the functionality of my Jet fighters. Wasn't hard at all to hit anyone with an unlimited magazine. Having just 12 rounds will be more than enough to waste any tank on the battleground!
Aside from that, good update! Might slam some extra atakas on my shit to compensate for the HMGs being gayer than before the buff.
- Every mincuntmaxer in this game[/I]
Not me, I don't use the 40mm HMGs, hail to you. No more faggotry in compettitive warfare
Loving things so far post-update, mortar smoke is fantastic. Did have to re-build my range tables, since it tweaked the ballistics of low-velocity shells, it seems. Also is a bit odd how shells of the same muzzle velocity for the same gun don't seem to have the same flightpaths - 102.7m/s 150mm HE flies longer than similar-speed SM shells from the same angle. This an intended behavior? Something doing with differing shell masses, I assume?
[QUOTE=arzofire;51856653][I]thx for completely ruining the functionality of my Jet fighters. Wasn't hard at all to hit anyone with an unlimited magazine. Having just 12 rounds will be more than enough to waste any tank on the battleground!
Aside from that, good update! Might slam some extra atakas on my shit to compensate for the HMGs being gayer than before the buff.
- Every mincuntmaxer in this game[/I]
Not me, I don't use the 40mm HMGs, hail to you. No more faggotry in compettitive warfare[/QUOTE]
No need to point out people put more atakas on their stuff, they already did even before the update lol.
Ballistic drag was increased, so that's why you'll need to rebuild tables. The difference between HE and SM trajectory is likely due to the different mass of the filler types.
[Edit]
I'm aware of issues with tracer effect and fuel amount, will be fixed in next patch (busy for next couple days, so may not be able to update until weekend).
Uhh don't know if this was because of the magical code merge between GGG and the main repositories or whatever when acf was updated (on ggg) but standalone clutches wont update with new settings (only clutches, other gearboxes seem to work fine) and fuel tanks apparently got a ~75% fuel capacity reduction (was wondering why I was running out of fuel 2 minutes into my flight).
Like, the 20 gallon fuel drum now only holds 6.
Privet tovarish!
[t]http://images.akamai.steamusercontent.com/ugc/94977361890344552/9BDE78979E3FFB948117F3588CCDA5ECFCA20A8E/[/t] [t]http://images.akamai.steamusercontent.com/ugc/94977361890344970/0C7C99F5444AA0FCC3F22B22ECF7D88262DD00B9/[/t]
[t]http://images.akamai.steamusercontent.com/ugc/94977361890345147/2A61A55540340519DCCADE9AD48CFA7F2EB647E1/[/t]
New engine model for ACF.
Seems to be if you want new stuff in acf you gotta roll up your sleeves and do it yourself.
Red said he'd do a V-2-34 & V-55 engine in ACF if I got him a model. After 9 years in development hopefully it's been worth the wait.
Ok so a few other people who main other servers have told me fuel is royally fucked up for them as well. They're reporting about 60% reduction in capacity which falls roughly in line with what I've seen as well.
[IMG]http://puu.sh/uhqL5/76d81dee15.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=TheMrFailz;51866593]Ok so a few other people who main other servers have told me fuel is royally fucked up for them as well. They're reporting about 60% reduction in capacity which falls roughly in line with what I've seen as well.[/QUOTE]
Oh, the irony.
I got to test the pod-firerate bonus on GGG, i hope to see it implemented in main fork, with maybe some balance change
so now hmgs are even more useless? autocannons are literally better than them in just about every single function
[QUOTE=TwistedTail;51868925][IMG]http://puu.sh/uhqL5/76d81dee15.jpg[/IMG]
Oh, the irony.[/QUOTE]
read
[QUOTE=Damnation;51856824]Ballistic drag was increased, so that's why you'll need to rebuild tables. The difference between HE and SM trajectory is likely due to the different mass of the filler types.
[Edit]
I'm aware of issues with tracer effect and fuel amount, will be fixed in next patch (busy for next couple days, so may not be able to update until weekend).[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Nesara;51868988]I got to test the pod-firerate bonus on GGG, i hope to see it implemented in main fork, with maybe some balance change[/QUOTE]
As far as I've tested, definitely needs a bit of a nerf to how much it does seeing as with 1 driver + 3 extra seats you get near x2 rof (600rpm MG becomes instant MG42). Also, currently doesn't have a downside yet.
you mean there wasn't even a check to see if the pods were ACTIVE before applying the rof buff? that's rich
[QUOTE=Nesara;51869040]read[/QUOTE]
I just posted your comment to make a comparison between that and the actual result
Also how's increased drag any good? Your guns will deal less damage and penetration at longer distances.
Edit: lol something was implemented without previous testing.
[QUOTE=lintz;51869063]you mean there wasn't even a check to see if the pods were ACTIVE before applying the rof buff? that's rich[/QUOTE]
Pods take up space. You're sacrificing space for the small buff. An active check wouldn't be consistent enough considering it's spidering off of something that's using a constraint check on certain things occurring instead of linking the gun itself to the seats.
Number of people that participate or want to ride along in clown car death traps is pretty low. Limiting the buff to only active pods basically makes it like there'd never be a buff at all, except for the vain few who would be standing around casually yelling out "need 3 more people to sit in the clown car" until their voices went hoarse.
it was a conscious decision, it's not like I forgot that there exists a :Driver() function in lua you douchebag.
[QUOTE=Sestze;51869238]Pods take up space. You're sacrificing space for the small buff. An active check wouldn't be consistent enough considering it's spidering off of something that's using a constraint check on certain things occurring instead of linking the gun itself to the seats.
Number of people that participate or want to ride along in clown car death traps is pretty low. Limiting the buff to only active pods basically makes it like there'd never be a buff at all, except for the vain few who would be standing around casually yelling out "need 3 more people to sit in the clown car" until their voices went hoarse.
it was a conscious decision, it's not like I forgot that there exists a :Driver() function in lua you douchebag.[/QUOTE]
Wow calm down Sestze no need to be such a fucking drama queen.
well, i agree that the loading speed buff should only apply to hand loaded guns, that way AC, MG and the such doesnt get a buff
[editline]24th February 2017[/editline]
also, are there any other active servers other than FRS ang GGG ?
sometimes, those 2 are empty and i don't really know where to go :/
[editline]24th February 2017[/editline]
[QUOTE=TwistedTail;51869142]I just posted your comment to make a comparison between that and the actual result
Also how's increased drag any good? Your guns will deal less damage and penetration at longer distances.
Edit: lol something was implemented without previous testing.[/QUOTE]
why do you only see the negative changes ? there is way more positive things in this update than negative things
i hope you're not one of those minmaxers who is angry because his pancake got nerfed post update
[QUOTE=Nesara;51869417]well, i agree that the loading speed buff should only apply to hand loaded guns, that way AC, MG and the such doesnt get a buff
[editline]24th February 2017[/editline]
also, are there any other active servers other than FRS ang GGG ?
sometimes, those 2 are empty and i don't really know where to go :/
[editline]24th February 2017[/editline]
why do you only see the negative changes ? there is way more positive things in this update than negative things
i hope you're not one of those minmaxers who is angry because his pancake got nerfed post update[/QUOTE]
Well to be honest, I only see three good changes, the rest is either pointless or theyre just bad.
Additionally, assuming hes a minmaxer is very low.
[QUOTE=Kardel;51869298]Wow calm down Sestze no need to be such a fucking drama queen.[/QUOTE]
To be fair, he gets a lot of Flak like this all the time. Every time he logs in he is bombarded with everything from requests to blames. He is right to be agitated when people make assumptions and immediately berate him.
[QUOTE=powersurge91;51869469]To be fair, he gets a lot of Flak like this all the time. Every time he logs in he is bombarded with everything from requests to blames. He is right to be agitated when people make assumptions and immediately berate him.[/QUOTE]
That tends to happen when you're in charge of something, no?
[QUOTE=TwistedTail;51869484]That tends to happen when you're in charge of something, no?[/QUOTE]
Comes with the job.
No Drama about it. Just Drama management...
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
