Quack Anti Cheat [Public Release] - Garry's Mod

[QUOTE=Aeternal;44388324]And from what I've read about your damn script. It's pretty shitty. [/QUOTE] Thanks for proving my point little child, twice as well. Read whatcha want and believe what you want. It's bad because it was my first project, yet I still made a couple $k off of it. Like I give a shit :^)

The ironic thing is that Rust's anticheat isn't as shitty as this one

[QUOTE=BFG9000;44388351]The ironic thing is that Rust's anticheat isn't as shitty as this one[/QUOTE] damn it's almost like a 1k line lua script is comparable to programmers in an entirely different language, as well as the 11~ years of experience the VAC team had. you just got me thinking, maybe I should offer gabe qac for csgo and tf2. i'll get right on it

[QUOTE=zerothefallen;44388369]damn it's almost like a 1k line lua script is comparable to programmers in an entirely different language, as well as the 11~ years of experience the VAC team had. you just got me thinking, maybe I should offer gabe qac for csgo and tf2. i'll get right on it[/QUOTE] *Gabe takes one look at QAC* What the fuck is this shit? It's worse than VAC!

Offer to sell him your backdoors as well [editline]28th March 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Aeternal;44388392]*Gabe takes one look at QAC* What the fuck is this shit? It's worse than VAC![/QUOTE] Let's be honest, VAC is actually alright

[QUOTE=BFG9000;44388404]Offer to sell him your backdoors as well [editline]28th March 2014[/editline] Let's be honest, VAC is actually alright[/QUOTE] I'll agree with you there. Zero. How much time have you spent rating everyone against you "Dumb"?

[QUOTE=Aeternal;44388456]I'll agree with you there. Zero. How much time have you spent rating everyone against you "Dumb"?[/QUOTE] a lot less time than you've spent spewing nonsense about how your copy of ttt inexplicably doesn't work without providing any sort of information to your situation, let alone a stack trace.

Actually my ttt server works just fine now. Removing his AC fixed the issue immediately. If I wanted help on that, then in wouldn't posted in the Help & Support section, which I already have. And it was not nonsense. I was stating the fact that his last update caused the HUD to completely fuck up. I'd never had an issue in the past with it until that last update. One last thing, my copy of TTT was just freshly installed. Again. So if you think that this was Garrys fault for making it incompatible with it then take it up with him.

[QUOTE=Aeternal;44388895]Actually my ttt server works just fine now. Removing his AC fixed the issue immediately. If I wanted help on that, then in wouldn't posted in the Help & Support section, which I already have. And it was not nonsense. I was stating the fact that his last update caused the HUD to completely fuck up. I'd never had an issue in the past with it until that last update. One last thing, my copy of TTT was just freshly installed. Again. So if you think that this was Garrys fault for making it incompatible with it then take it up with him.[/QUOTE] Still waiting for you to provide proof. I told you to redownload from the OP and use it again. I already proved vanilla TTT works completely fine BTW Not my fault your shitty server filled to the brim with garbage is being broken. Not even a lua error

[QUOTE=zerothefallen;44388934]Still waiting for you to provide proof. I told you to redownload from the OP and use it again. I already proved vanilla TTT works completely fine BTW Not my fault your shitty server filled to the brim with garbage is being broken. Not even a lua error[/QUOTE] I'm not putting the script back on my server. I'll set up a local server tomorrow and report back. I'll test it with the CH and the updated OP versions.

[QUOTE=Aeternal;44388895]Actually my ttt server works just fine now. Removing his AC fixed the issue immediately. If I wanted help on that, then in wouldn't posted in the Help & Support section, which I already have. And it was not nonsense. I was stating the fact that his last update caused the HUD to completely fuck up. I'd never had an issue in the past with it until that last update. One last thing, my copy of TTT was just freshly installed. Again. So if you think that this was Garrys fault for making it incompatible with it then take it up with him.[/QUOTE] [url]http://forums.ulyssesmod.net/index.php/topic,6850.msg33826.html#msg33826[/url] A single Google search of both of your errors leads to this. This has nothing to do with QAC, it looks like the fault is to be put on that Colbalt's ULX command thing... which you appear to be using as well if your support thread is anything to go by.

[QUOTE=Joeyl10;44388965][url]http://forums.ulyssesmod.net/index.php/topic,6850.msg33826.html#msg33826[/url] A single Google search of both of your errors leads to this. This has nothing to do with QAC, it looks like the fault is to be put on that Colbalt's ULX command thing... which you appear to be using as well if your support thread is anything to go by.[/QUOTE] I tested QAC WITHOUT anything custom (including ulx commands, server side scripts etc.) and it still fucked up the HUD. I'll test it with and without cobalts commands as well

[QUOTE=Joeyl10;44388965][url]http://forums.ulyssesmod.net/index.php/topic,6850.msg33826.html#msg33826[/url] A single Google search of both of your errors leads to this. This has nothing to do with QAC, it looks like the fault is to be put on that Colbalt's ULX command thing... which you appear to be using as well if your support thread is anything to go by.[/QUOTE] Jesus christ Aeternal you make me cry

[QUOTE=zerothefallen;44388988]Jesus christ Aeternal you make me cry[/QUOTE] Poor you. Want a sucker? Maybe a bandage on your boo-boo? You sound ridiculous. Get over yourself you washed up has been. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Don't be rude." - postal))[/highlight]

Stop this awful fucking argument. QAC isn't causing your HUD issues; nothing in the code modifies the HUD like that. If it works without QAC, then another addon doesn't work with it.

I think this thread is terribly funny, and despite the fact that it's enjoyable, I do feel the need to point out one particular flaw that keeps making you, zero, look bad. It seems for the entire duration of this thread, you've been rocking a pretty ridiculous superiority complex and can't find it in you to simply stop trying to one-up everyone. I do have a problem with not liking certain things about your cheat and the whole releasing after selling ordeal, but the biggest thing piercing my retinas is reading all of your responses. They're done in absolutely the wrong way. Had you taken the time to respectfully address each issue or just ease up on your over-defensiveness, people would have the ability to relate and understand you to a much higher extent than just verbally headbutting everyone. I've been put on the spot for valid reasons in the past, and what helps is understanding what it is you've done wrong and showing people that you're ready to move on and improve yourself. I know that might sound harsh, but I am trying to be sincere in my explanation of why you're not getting the best responses back. Moving past that, I don't feel your anti-cheat is up to snuff, but you as a coder can improve if you take people's advice and care more for your development rather than simply releasing your scripts on the marketplace. Don't focus on the image or marketability - just work on the code itself. Do it because you like programming. I think that this might be one particular problem that points to why this script isn't very good - it seems (if I am understanding the people in this thread correctly), that there are bits and pieces of this script that are derived from other scripts. Even with permission, it's much better to program it yourself so you understand how it works and get more practice in. Then you should refer to other people and kindly ask for critique to see where you can improve or how to fix potential problems. That's what I've done with my Lua for as long as I can remember, and while I'm in no way the best Lua coder in the world - there are a lot of problems I need to face with my weapon base that I'm going to recode soon - I have improved immensely and have built good relations with people. In my mind, the only things that should be sold (if at all) are the finest-quality scripts that are original and solve a problem more than just well. It should solve the problem [I]exceptionally[/I] and be something worth paying for. You said there were at least [B]three[/B] ways to bypass your script - why didn't you try tackling some of those problems before releasing your anti-cheat? I predict you're cooking up an insult for me but understand that I am not posting this to blast you, although I will admit that I think you are making a fool of yourself. I am posting this to show that despite the negativity of the thread and your brash behavior, you can be a better programmer if you put in your efforts, show your efforts, and try to address concerns in a kinder way. People in this thread have beef with you but I personally don't, I just think your responses are blaring and you aren't dedicated to programming - at least not for the right reasons.

[QUOTE=wauterboi;44389359]I think this thread is terribly funny, and despite the fact that it's enjoyable, I do feel the need to point out one particular flaw that keeps making you, zero, look bad. It seems for the entire duration of this thread, you've been rocking a pretty ridiculous superiority complex and can't find it in you to simply stop trying to one-up everyone. I do have a problem with not liking certain things about your cheat and the whole releasing after selling ordeal, but the biggest thing piercing my retinas is reading all of your responses. They're done in absolutely the wrong way. Had you taken the time to respectfully address each issue or just ease up on your over-defensiveness, people would have the ability to relate and understand you to a much higher extent than just verbally headbutting everyone. I've been put on the spot for valid reasons in the past, and what helps is understanding what it is you've done wrong and showing people that you're ready to move on and improve yourself. I know that might sound harsh, but I am trying to be sincere in my explanation of why you're not getting the best responses back. Moving past that, I don't feel your anti-cheat is up to snuff, but you as a coder can improve if you take people's advice and care more for your development rather than simply releasing your scripts on the marketplace. Don't focus on the image or marketability - just work on the code itself. Do it because you like programming. I think that this might be one particular problem that points to why this script isn't very good - it seems (if I am understanding the people in this thread correctly), that there are bits and pieces of this script that are derived from other scripts. Even with permission, it's much better to program it yourself so you understand how it works and get more practice in. Then you should refer to other people and kindly ask for critique to see where you can improve or how to fix potential problems. That's what I've done with my Lua for as long as I can remember, and while I'm in no way the best Lua coder in the world - there are a lot of problems I need to face with my weapon base that I'm going to recode soon - I have improved immensely and have built good relations with people. In my mind, the only things that should be sold (if at all) are the finest-quality scripts that are original and solve a problem more than just well. It should solve the problem [I]exceptionally[/I] and be something worth paying for. You said there were at least [B]three[/B] ways to bypass your script - why didn't you try tackling some of those problems before releasing your anti-cheat? I predict you're cooking up an insult for me but understand that I am not posting this to blast you, although I will admit that I think you are making a fool of yourself. I am posting this to show that despite the negativity of the thread and your brash behavior, you can be a better programmer if you put in your efforts, show your efforts, and try to address concerns in a kinder way. People in this thread have beef with you but I personally don't, I just think your responses are blaring and you aren't dedicated to programming - at least not for the right reasons.[/QUOTE] This is not my problem. I know the code is awful. It was made in less than 1 hour, it was a very simple method to detection, easy to bypass, and I added on very badly, and unoptimized code on top of it. Do I not understand my own code? No, I understand each and every piece of it and how it works. Sure I could rewrite the screen grabber so it's my own. render.capture, base64, etc, and display the data on an html page by decoding it. But why, Why would I want to rewrite something like that? I strive to get better at coding and do what I feel like will better me. QAC, sadly, is not going to better me. I don't know how to do VGUI well because I never needed it for QAC, I never needed to learn how to make a game mode, there is plenty of shit I don't know in Lua, or any other language. You seem to misunderstand what I want. I'm not trying to prove Im the best ac maker in the world, nor am I proving QAC > LEYAC LOLOLO. I just want people to focus on the script, not dumb rumors. QAC did it's job. It essentially took a dump on the skid market. 0 free Public gmod cheats exist that bypass qac, at least that I know of. None on mpgh, none on hackforums. I dont count aimware c++ cheats as public because, buying it != public. So now whats the problem with releasing qac? It will indeed catch a lot of cheaters, and I can give you lots of data to back that up. Some people seem to have the thought that if it doesnt catch EVERYTHING, that's it useless. Why? I'm being told to "try again" when it's not like QAC is useless. QAC is far from useless. It will catch the idiots, who are the problem. Do you actually think people who know [I]how to code will even bother[/I] with lua cheats? Fuck no. HeX AC maybe good but it's literal a piece of trash as long as I don't touch the lua state. Sure he can do it SMAC style, check for eye angles, check for force seed, all this shit, but in the end, lua slowly loses it's grip around stopping cheaters, and will have little to do. Just because it doesnt stop people like wuat from cheating, doesnt mean "its completely useless" Though, through all of that. Is that my problem? [B]No, it's not.[/B] My problem lies with the stupid children who enjoy posting like flat out lies to make me look bad. In the end, I made myself look worst because I was upset, even compared to the child who admitted [url=http://puu.sh/7NMuD.png]to[/url] [url=http://puu.sh/7NMvi.png]ddosing[/url] [url=http://puu.sh/7NMvL.png]a[/url] [url=http://puu.sh/7NMwg.png]whole[/url] community and then tried saying "its no big deal" who then [url=http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1281665&p=44380060&viewfull=1#post44380060]continued to lie about me stealing his code.[/url] Then I have accusations of backdooring my own add-on and other addons when there has been 0 supplied proof of that ever happening. Have I fucked up servers with exploits on them? Yeah, I did. Over a year ago. There was a big thread on it and an apology from me and blah blah. Why does it suddenly become "QAC IS BACKDOORED OMG" and "HE HACKED MY SERVER LAST WEEK" when I havent joined a gmod server in over 3 weeks now? So far apparently every single part of my AC is skidded.The screen grabber isnt Serverguards -- I don't even own that add-on nor have I ever read it. Its a public one [B]which I was given permission.[/B] I know my coding isnt the best, but I don't claim it to be the best, I never once remember typing "IM THE BEST CODER." If I did, please feel free to post it. I am just simply annoyed with the 14 year olds who seem to lie, and then the FP community will eat it up like fucking soup because it was formatted correctly.

Why isn't improving QAC going to better you as a coder? The reason that there are flaws in QAC is because you didn't know how to fix them (or are very lazy). When you fix them, you'll be learning more about Lua. It's all about reiteration and improving your shortcomings when it comes to writing Lua scripts. That's how you become a better coder. That's how Steve Wozniak became such a good designer, he challenged himself to be more and more efficient with each iteration of his designs. You might think that you'd never use what you learn from improving QAC, but you'd be wrong. Only when you know everything about a language should you be satisfied with yourself as a coder.

[QUOTE=zerothefallen;44389668] - wall o' text - [/QUOTE] The reason why everyone's jumping on the "QAC is backdoored" bandwagon is because of your reputation. You backdoored a couple of addons, helped a group of people exploit it for their own gain, then (presumably because you felt guilty) publicly admitted to doing so in hopes of people forgiving you and just forgetting about it. I mean you can't really go back in time and undo your actions, so people might as well just get over it and give you a free pass just because you acknowledged your wrongdoings? It doesn't work like that. With your wrongdoings you damaged your own reputation GREATLY. Thanks to that people are going to be more skeptical about the legitimacy of your scripts (and everything else for that matter), and are more likely to believe negative things they hear about you than positive. However you need to keep in mind that you have no one but yourself to blame for this, for you essentially dug your own grave with your past actions. Not just that, but even now you're essentially giving people the notion that you don't care about anything and the release of QAC is nothing more than some sort of a "fuck you" to Undefined and CH in general. It may not be the exact reason why you did it (and personally I don't really care) but if you release something publicly it is expected of you to take responsibility for it. If I were you I'd be careful with my attitude and behavior, otherwise you may ruin your reputation even more.

[QUOTE=zerothefallen;44389668]This is not my problem. I know the code is awful. It was made in less than 1 hour, it was a very simple method to detection, easy to bypass, and I added on very badly, and unoptimized code on top of it. Do I not understand my own code? No, I understand each and every piece of it and how it works. Sure I could rewrite the screen grabber so it's my own. render.capture, base64, etc, and display the data on an html page by decoding it. But why, Why would I want to rewrite something like that? I strive to get better at coding and do what I feel like will better me. QAC, sadly, is not going to better me. I don't know how to do VGUI well because I never needed it for QAC, I never needed to learn how to make a game mode, there is plenty of shit I don't know in Lua, or any other language. You seem to misunderstand what I want. I'm not trying to prove Im the best ac maker in the world, nor am I proving QAC > LEYAC LOLOLO. I just want people to focus on the script, not dumb rumors. QAC did it's job. It essentially took a dump on the skid market. 0 free Public gmod cheats exist that bypass qac, at least that I know of. None on mpgh, none on hackforums. I dont count aimware c++ cheats as public because, buying it != public. So now whats the problem with releasing qac? It will indeed catch a lot of cheaters, and I can give you lots of data to back that up. Some people seem to have the thought that if it doesnt catch EVERYTHING, that's it useless. Why? I'm being told to "try again" when it's not like QAC is useless. QAC is far from useless. It will catch the idiots, who are the problem. Do you actually think people who know [I]how to code will even bother[/I] with lua cheats? Fuck no. HeX AC maybe good but it's literal a piece of trash as long as I don't touch the lua state. Sure he can do it SMAC style, check for eye angles, check for force seed, all this shit, but in the end, lua slowly loses it's grip around stopping cheaters, and will have little to do. Just because it doesnt stop people like wuat from cheating, doesnt mean "its completely useless" Though, through all of that. Is that my problem? [B]No, it's not.[/B] My problem lies with the stupid children who enjoy posting like flat out lies to make me look bad. In the end, I made myself look worst because I was upset, even compared to the child who admitted [url=http://puu.sh/7NMuD.png]to[/url] [url=http://puu.sh/7NMvi.png]ddosing[/url] [url=http://puu.sh/7NMvL.png]a[/url] [url=http://puu.sh/7NMwg.png]whole[/url] community and then tried saying "its no big deal" who then [url=http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1281665&p=44380060&viewfull=1#post44380060]continued to lie about me stealing his code.[/url] Then I have accusations of backdooring my own add-on and other addons when there has been 0 supplied proof of that ever happening. Have I fucked up servers with exploits on them? Yeah, I did. Over a year ago. There was a big thread on it and an apology from me and blah blah. Why does it suddenly become "QAC IS BACKDOORED OMG" and "HE HACKED MY SERVER LAST WEEK" when I havent joined a gmod server in over 3 weeks now? So far apparently every single part of my AC is skidded.The screen grabber isnt Serverguards -- I don't even own that add-on nor have I ever read it. Its a public one [B]which I was given permission.[/B] I know my coding isnt the best, but I don't claim it to be the best, I never once remember typing "IM THE BEST CODER." If I did, please feel free to post it. I am just simply annoyed with the 14 year olds who seem to lie, and then the FP community will eat it up like fucking soup because it was formatted correctly.[/QUOTE] Stop being so mad and admit it. I'm not even lying. I don't know what's your problem, but just give up already. Just because I didn't check the thread because I thought you finally realized your mistakes and gave up, you rage more. I told you to stop calling people child's, because it's a bad insult. There are child's who are better than you in a lot of things, and older people that are worse in a lot of things - so stop. And you keep referencing to that ddos, which was maybe 120 seconds, while I already said everything about it. I didn't even ddos the hole community ( and you didn't even show the hole log ). But I don't really care about it anymore, I think you're referencing to it, because it's the only bad thing you got on me. Everyone does mistakes, that was one of mine - but I admit it ( Even though it has nothing to do with you at all, nor with this thread, nor with my coding or your coding and I don't care about it anymore. ), you don't, you keep trying to say that I'm a liar and a "stupid child", to make people believe that you never stole code. I can do that too, for example [url]http://puu.sh/7NRUY.png[/url] ( Kinda worse than that ? ), but I can't be arsed to. It's one thing to steal code I made, but it's another one to say you didn't steal it, you even posted it on coderhire, in the comment section of QAC as I told you to remove it, trying to make me mad ( even though you deleted the comment later on it still spread, you ended up getting banned for it, made it uglier calling it a 'recode' to put your AC back up, I don't think anyone would do that if it wasn't stolen ). I've got an easy idea, instead of spamming facepunch with all of those posts, how about you, accepting my steam invite and to let me talk to you ? Edit: [QUOTE=zerothefallen;44362407]1. No its not the screengrab is from a public screengrab addon called pablo's screengrab and I asked him for permission.... Who are you trying to fool kid lol? 2. Runstring detour was in place to stop backdoors since a heavy majority of them used runstring at the time, why are you crying so much? 3. anticheat was ignoring me in the beginning for testing, i most likely forgot to take it out, can check every version of QAC on coderhire if you want, none of them contain me. As if I need it to ignore me anyways. 4. I dont care if its malicious little skids like you shouldnt be cheating cry more. 5. leystryku's idea is 10 lines, and using higher than 66 tick rate is derp as well, shouldnt happen in the first place. I know you like showing off your "1337 lua chets!!!!" all over FP, except no one cares dude. Stop crying and being a little child, like damn. [editline]26th March 2014[/editline] keeping sucking leystryku's dick though when he's a confirmed asshole, ddoser, and someone who sucks other coder's cocks to help him all the time[/QUOTE] You also admitted it in the beginning, now you suddenly don't anymore. why ?

[IMG]http://puu.sh/7NWp6.png[/IMG] Have fun using low-quality anticheat that causes a lot of false positives + shitload of skids that will play on your server and this garbage won't detect/ban them :)

[QUOTE=ks_uw-the_cat;44390688]I'm really tired of ZeroTheFallen going around like is anti-cheat is some godly anti-cheat that will never be bypassed[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=zerothefallen;44358663] PS, I know like 3 insanely easy bypasses to this[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=zerothefallen;44389668] I'm not trying to prove Im the best ac maker in the world, nor am I proving QAC > LEYAC LOLOLO[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Sally;44390932]-things-[/QUOTE] Well, when he was selling his AC @ CH, he said in description that he could detect any cheat he "goes accross", and other literally supernatural things. I could prove it by getting a snapshot from wayback machine, but sadly, CH has it blocked. [video=youtube;GjviMVTRqRc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjviMVTRqRc[/video]

[QUOTE=zerothefallen;44362407]1. No its not the screengrab is from a public screengrab addon called pablo's screengrab and I asked him for permission.... Who are you trying to fool kid lol? [/QUOTE] The same one you backdoored into my server with?

[QUOTE=ks_uw-the_cat;44391603]Well, when he was selling his AC @ CH, he said in description that he could detect any cheat he "goes accross", and other literally supernatural things. I could prove it by getting a snapshot from wayback machine, but sadly, CH has it blocked.[/QUOTE] What the flying fuck do you expect? Its a product, I'm suppose to make it sound good. I wrote the description in an exact way where it wasnt lying either.

[QUOTE=zerothefallen;44392460]What the flying fuck do you expect? Its a product, I'm suppose to make it sound good. I wrote the description in an exact way where it wasnt lying either.[/QUOTE] I'd expect you to not lie to your customers to make your cheat sound better, almost every part of your anti-cheat does nothing, it seems that you only pick up unsynched convars, you lied to your customers to make your anti-cheat look like it detected things that in reality, it did not, sure it may have "picked up" every "public cheat" but it's so inconsistent on when it bans that it's really quite sad, I'm sure like I said, if I loaded Hera renamed/before autorun, you wouldn't pick it up. It was a petty lie to your consumers to increase sales. [img]http://4st.me/QtjDR.png[/img] Had this been before it was released, and you said this, I'm sure your customers would've been pissed. [video=youtube;GjviMVTRqRc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjviMVTRqRc[/video]

[QUOTE=Reyjr43;44392705]I'd expect you to not lie to your customers to make your cheat sound better, almost every part of your anti-cheat does nothing, it seems that you only pick up unsynched convars, you lied to your customers to make your anti-cheat look like it detected things that in reality, it did not, sure it may have "picked up" every "public cheat" but it's so inconsistent on when it bans that it's really quite sad, I'm sure like I said, if I loaded Hera renamed/before autorun, you wouldn't pick it up. It was a petty lie to your consumers to increase sales. [img]http://4st.me/QtjDR.png[/img] [video=youtube;GjviMVTRqRc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjviMVTRqRc[/video][/QUOTE] I dont have any obligation to update qac anymore. lol didnt lie either, keep bein' mad [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Don't be rude." - postal))[/highlight]

[QUOTE=zerothefallen;44392728]I dont have any obligation to update qac anymore. lol didnt lie either, keep bein' mad[/QUOTE] I'm mad? You were the one that literally just said a few posts above mine that you were "mad" that I was calling you out on all the bullshit you claimed, and did.

[QUOTE=Reyjr43;44392745]I'm mad? You were the one that literally just said a few posts above mine that you were "mad" that I was calling you out on all the bullshit you claimed, and did.[/QUOTE] Sometimes I wonder when little 12 year olds will understand marketing :^) [editline]29th March 2014[/editline] but yea, im just gonna take npypntz's advice

[QUOTE=zerothefallen;44392786]Sometimes I wonder when little 12 year olds will understand marketing :^) [editline]29th March 2014[/editline] but yea, im just gonna take npypntz's advice[/QUOTE] Yet you go back and attack people despite everyone in the thread saying it makes you come off as a dick? You will never learn, you must have a very, very thick skull, because what goes in never comes back out.