Meep Antiscript - The reason I am called a skid

[iMaasie]

[QUOTE=MeepDarknessM;45679299]lmao what, a byte is 8 bits, a crc is a dword (4 bytes, 32 bits), a kilobyte is 1024 bytes (256 crcs)[/QUOTE]

You are aware that a bit is either 0 or 1 and cannot possibly be the number 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9?

[AlvyP]

[QUOTE=MeepDarknessM;45679339]sorry, you said bytes back in that last post. but yes you are correct in that math.

[editline]13th August 2014[/editline]

If they don't know how to get a steamid they shouldn't be hosting a server.[/QUOTE]

You can't code, so you shouldn't be doing it, but you still are.

[MeepDarknessM]

[QUOTE=iMaasie;45679354]You are aware that a bit is either 0 or 1 and cannot possibly be the number 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9?[/QUOTE]

Yes, but what does that have to do with anything?

[editline]13th August 2014[/editline]

[QUOTE=Reyjr43;45679356]You can't code, so you shouldn't be doing it, but you still are.[/QUOTE]

I'd like proof that i can't code. I don't see any.

[AlvyP]

[QUOTE=MeepDarknessM;45679364]Yes, but what does that have to do with anything?

[editline]13th August 2014[/editline]

I'd like proof that i can't code. I don't see any.[/QUOTE]

Obviously you're delusional, you haven't looked at your "anti-cheat" yet and you seemed to have forgotten all about the image I put in the FP thread with you admitting to C+Ping code and not knowing what it does, hush now before you make yourself look more stupid.

You have stolen so much from LeyAC (even concepts) and failed to copy them all correctly.

[MeepDarknessM]

[QUOTE=Reyjr43;45679382]Obviously you're delusional, you haven't looked at your "anti-cheat" yet and you seemed to have forgotten all about the image I put in the FP thread with you admitting to C+Ping code and not knowing what it does, hush now before you make yourself look more stupid.

You have stolen so much from LeyAC (even concepts) and failed to copy them all correctly.[/QUOTE]

I'm sorry but that picture proves nothing. It is saying sarcastically
"Oh, sorry. I didn't know I copied everything in that code"

[AlvyP]

[QUOTE=MeepDarknessM;45679450]I'm sorry but that picture proves nothing. It is saying sarcastically
"Oh, sorry. I didn't know I copied everything in that code"[/QUOTE]

[img]http://4st.me/di17y.png[/img]

Whatever lets you sleep at night.

EDIT: Apparently Nano meant .rdata, but my point still stands.

[MeepDarknessM]

[QUOTE=Reyjr43;45679471][img]http://4st.me/di17y.png[/img]

Whatever lets you sleep at night.

EDIT: Apparently Nano meant .rdata, but my point still stands.[/QUOTE]

oh, yes. I did copy that code. I made that class forever ago though. Yes I admit I copied that. I thought the quote was from something else. Sorry.

[editline]13th August 2014[/editline]

But what does that have to do with this addon?

[AlvyP]

[QUOTE=MeepDarknessM;45679499]oh, yes. I did copy that code. I made that class forever ago though. Yes I admit I copied that. I thought the quote was from something else. Sorry.

[editline]13th August 2014[/editline]

But what does that have to do with this addon?[/QUOTE]

2 months ago is forever ago? Well, okay, if you say so.

[LauScript]

Where did you get a working OSG skin for steam?

[MeepDarknessM]

[QUOTE=Reyjr43;45679521]2 months ago is forever ago? Well, okay, if you say so.[/QUOTE]

I said when I made that class, not when it was leaked.

[iMaasie]

[QUOTE=MeepDarknessM;45679499]I thought the quote was from something else.[/QUOTE]

You're implying that you've used those words more than once. Therefore, you're implying that you C+P'd things more than once.

[MeepDarknessM]

[QUOTE=iMaasie;45679535]You're implying that you've used those words more than once. Therefore, you're implying that you C+P'd things more than once.[/QUOTE]
[quote]I'm sorry but that picture proves nothing. It is saying sarcastically
"Oh, sorry. I didn't know I copied everything in that code" [/quote]

[iMaasie]

[QUOTE=MeepDarknessM;45679450]I'm sorry but that picture proves nothing. It is saying sarcastically
"Oh, sorry. I didn't know I copied everything in that code"[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MeepDarknessM;45679499]oh, yes. I did copy that code. I made that class forever ago though. Yes I admit I copied that.[/QUOTE]

This is too easy. Either I advise you to look up "sarcasm" or I'm calling bullshit.

[MeepDarknessM]

[QUOTE=iMaasie;45679584]This is too easy. Either I advise you to look up "sarcasm" or I'm calling bullshit.[/QUOTE]

The quote that was posted was taken out of context by myself, I thought it was said differently since I didn't see who I was talking to and what was being said.

[iMaasie]

[QUOTE=MeepDarknessM;45679594]The quote that was posted was taken out of context by myself, I thought it was said differently since I didn't see who I was talking to and what was being said.[/QUOTE]

I'm just going to leave it at this, you're not going to give up. I advise you to look over everything that was said here, followed by long and hard thinking, followed by questioning your own sanity.

[FPtje]

[QUOTE=MeepDarknessM;45679364]
I'd like proof that i can't code. I don't see any.[/QUOTE]
[url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/meepdarknessmeep/mas/bcc28bb130ea15e8134365b0bba42faf2d671a27/lua/mas/cl_init.lua][B]Four[/B][/url] functions to copy a table.
[lua]function ac.CopyTableN_l(tbl)
DebugPrint();
local ret = {};
for k,v in next, tbl, nil do
ret[k] = v;
end
return ret;
end

function ac.CopyTableP_l(tbl)
DebugPrint();
local ret = {};
for k,v in pairs(tbl) do
ret[k] = v;
end
return ret;
end

function ac.CopyTableP(tbl, dun)
DebugPrint();
if(not tbl) then return tbl; end
local ret = {};
local dun = dun or {};
if(dun[tbl]) then return dun[tbl]; end
dun[tbl] = ret;
for k,v in pairs(tbl) do
if(type(v) == "table") then
ret[k] = ac.CopyTableN(v, dun);
continue;
end
ret[k] = v;
end
return ret;
end

function ac.CopyTableN(tbl, dun)
DebugPrint();
if(not tbl) then return tbl; end
local ret = {};
local dun = dun or {};
if(dun[tbl]) then return dun[tbl]; end
dun[tbl] = ret;
for k,v in pairs(tbl) do
if(type(v) == "table") then
ret[k] = ac.CopyTableP(v, dun);
continue;
end
ret[k] = v;
end
return ret;
end[/lua]
The first two, exactly the same, return a copy of the table, like the standard [i]table.Copy[/i] function, except without copying member tables.
The last two, also exactly the same, call [I]each other[/I] in a twin recursive setup, with as goal to copy a table more deeply. It uses the second parameter, "dun" (lovely name) internally and fills it with data only then to do [B]nothing[/B] with it.

I would say this isn't any proof that you [B]cannot[/B] code. However, it [I]does[/I] provide a [U]very strong[/U] indicator that says you only just started learning Lua and/or programming in general. As such I strongly recommend you to not boast about your programming/scripting abilities or ask for proof that you cannot code.

I also disrecommend rewriting history on git. That would make the link at the start of this post invalid.

[LauScript]

[QUOTE=FPtje;45680920][url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/meepdarknessmeep/mas/bcc28bb130ea15e8134365b0bba42faf2d671a27/lua/mas/cl_init.lua][B]Four[/B][/url] functions to copy a table.
[lua]function ac.CopyTableN_l(tbl)
DebugPrint();
local ret = {};
for k,v in next, tbl, nil do
ret[k] = v;
end
return ret;
end

function ac.CopyTableP_l(tbl)
DebugPrint();
local ret = {};
for k,v in pairs(tbl) do
ret[k] = v;
end
return ret;
end

function ac.CopyTableP(tbl, dun)
DebugPrint();
if(not tbl) then return tbl; end
local ret = {};
local dun = dun or {};
if(dun[tbl]) then return dun[tbl]; end
dun[tbl] = ret;
for k,v in pairs(tbl) do
if(type(v) == "table") then
ret[k] = ac.CopyTableN(v, dun);
continue;
end
ret[k] = v;
end
return ret;
end

function ac.CopyTableN(tbl, dun)
DebugPrint();
if(not tbl) then return tbl; end
local ret = {};
local dun = dun or {};
if(dun[tbl]) then return dun[tbl]; end
dun[tbl] = ret;
for k,v in pairs(tbl) do
if(type(v) == "table") then
ret[k] = ac.CopyTableP(v, dun);
continue;
end
ret[k] = v;
end
return ret;
end[/lua]
The first two, exactly the same, return a copy of the table, like the standard [i]table.Copy[/i] function, except without copying member tables.
The last two, also exactly the same, call [I]each other[/I] in a twin recursive setup, with as goal to copy a table more deeply. It uses the second parameter, "dun" (lovely name) internally and fills it with data only then to do [B]nothing[/B] with it.

I would say this isn't any proof that you [B]cannot[/B] code. However, it [I]does[/I] provide a [U]very strong[/U] indicator that says you only just started learning Lua and/or programming in general. As such I strongly recommend you to not boast about your programming/scripting abilities or ask for proof that you cannot code.

I also disrecommend rewriting history on git. That would make the link at the start of this post invalid.[/QUOTE]

To add to that, duplicate functions is usually another indicator of copying code with no knowledge of what it is. An experienced scripter(or a scripter at all for that matter) would never allow that to happen because why would they type the same function twice. Idon't understand how you think it is possible to attempt and fool a forum full of experienced scripters. Now you basically have to change your permanently tainted name.(been there done that)

Also you just got shit on by darkrp.

[MeepDarknessM]

One function uses next, one uses pairs. This prevents people from just overriding next or pairs. Two of those are also "light" copying of tables.

Also, [url=https://github.com/garrynewman/garrysmod/blob/master/garrysmod/lua/includes/extensions/table.lua#L24]you obviously have no idea how garry's mod or lua works[/url]

[LauScript]

[QUOTE=MeepDarknessM;45681369]One function uses next, one uses pairs. This prevents people from just overriding next or pairs. Two of those are also "light" copying of tables.

Also, [url=https://github.com/garrynewman/garrysmod/blob/master/garrysmod/lua/includes/extensions/table.lua#L24]you obviously have no idea how garry's mod or lua works[/url][/QUOTE]

This is for garry's mod?

[zerothefallen]

y r u guys flaming.

wtf

[MeepDarknessM]

[QUOTE=LauScript;45681547]This is for garry's mod?[/QUOTE]

no this is for tf2......

[LauScript]

[QUOTE=MeepDarknessM;45681566]no this is for tf2......[/QUOTE]

Omg

[DevulTj]

[QUOTE=MeepDarknessM;45681566]no this is for tf2......[/QUOTE]

cool do I need sourcemod?

[MeepDarknessM]

[QUOTE=mib999;45681828]cool do I need sourcemod?[/QUOTE]

no just drop it in glua directory inside hl2 folder

[LauScript]

So my tf2 doesnt have a lua folder nor will it recognise the one ive created how do I install this?

[FPtje]

[QUOTE=MeepDarknessM;45681369]One function uses next, one uses pairs. This prevents people from just overriding next or pairs. Two of those are also "light" copying of tables.

Also, [url=https://github.com/garrynewman/garrysmod/blob/master/garrysmod/lua/includes/extensions/table.lua#L24]you obviously have no idea how garry's mod or lua works[/url][/QUOTE]

I sincerely recommend you to stop boasting and telling people they don't know Lua. This post really tells me you're being overly confident yourself. Overriding pairs can fuck up one function, breaking the half of your AC using it, overriding pairs can break the other half. Using both in a rewrite of the same function is not in any way more secure than just using one. You implying that it is, is yet another indicator that you're a beginning scripter.

I'm honestly trying to tell you that you're making a fool of yourself, for [I]your [/I]sake. Some scripters on this forums are well experienced with Lua. Some even have a bachelor's degree in computer science. Many best practices are learnt by looking at other people's code, trying new things out and generally doing stuff wrong at first. Look at my own examples. FPP and Falco's Small scripts were projects started when I just learned Lua. Since I never really recoded them, you can tell that the older parts are shitty and made by an inexperienced coder. You can actually tell by looking at the code. The same applies to your code, and I've shown you why.

Being a beginning Lua scripter is not a bad thing, but don't act like you know everything. You'll be called out for that.

[Phoenixf129]

I'm afraid if I post popcorn.gif I will be banned :v:

Well he did state in the title "The reason why I am called a skid"... so you all know what you came here for.

[MeepDarknessM]

[QUOTE=FPtje;45682080]I sincerely recommend you to stop boasting and telling people they don't know Lua. This post really tells me you're being overly confident yourself. Overriding pairs can fuck up one function, breaking the half of your AC using it, overriding pairs can break the other half. Using both in a rewrite of the same function is not in any way more secure than just using one. You implying that it is, is yet another indicator that you're a beginning scripter.

I'm honestly trying to tell you that you're making a fool of yourself, for [I]your [/I]sake. Some scripters on this forums are well experienced with Lua. Some even have a bachelor's degree in computer science. Many best practices are learnt by looking at other people's code, trying new things out and generally doing stuff wrong at first. Look at my own examples. FPP and Falco's Small scripts were projects started when I just learned Lua. Since I never really recoded them, you can tell that the older parts are shitty and made by an inexperienced coder. You can actually tell by looking at the code. The same applies to your code, and I've shown you why.

Being a beginning Lua scripter is not a bad thing, but don't act like you know everything. You'll be called out for that.[/QUOTE]

lmao, I am not a beginner. Stop being a self-righteous retard who thinks they know everything. You obviously don't know what i've coded and why I coded what I posted here how I did. You are not helping anyone by posting stuff like that.

[FPtje]

[QUOTE=MeepDarknessM;45682315]lmao, I am not a beginner. Stop being a self-righteous retard who thinks they know everything. You obviously don't know what i've coded and why I coded what I posted here how I did. You are not helping anyone by posting stuff like that.[/QUOTE]

Ha! Alright then. Refute the argument that starts at the third sentence of my previous post, I dare you.
I'll shift the focus from warning you to providing entertainment for the other readers of this thread.

[MeepDarknessM]

[QUOTE=FPtje;45682359]Ha! Alright then. Refute the argument that starts at the third sentence of my previous post, I dare you.
I'll shift the focus from warning you to providing entertainment for the other readers of this thread.[/QUOTE]
-snipe read wrong at first

Also, most skids don't even know what next is.

[editline]13th August 2014[/editline]

And so what if I use two? If I don't use two, then someone could just bypass one function. What's the difference?