• Risk to Conquer revisited
    597 replies, posted
Or maybe the possible lag?
Superpowers, make them
gogogogogo
wel, i offered a alliedship with the UK, so far no reaction here. maybe those swedfags be more interested in combining our might and knowlage into a super power.
I am not sure if UK would want to work with you.
[QUOTE=Kickasskyle;14725535]Lol. That's not THAT big. I've seen bigger tanks.[/QUOTE] Like your Baneblade? :smile: [QUOTE=megamadgamer;14725557]so have i, but i have to stick to prop limits, if i had no limit, she would be about the size of a warship on land... :ninja:[/QUOTE] Soooo, it's some kind of landkreuzer? Also, don't be so sure of your might and power, UK and Sweden will easily kick your ass I believe.
[QUOTE=Joazzz;14726061]Like your Baneblade? :smile: Soooo, it's some kind of landkreuzer? Also, don't be so sure of your might and power, UK and Sweden will easily kick your ass I believe.[/QUOTE] yes, a sort of landkreuzer, just smaller, and with more armor. and dont be too sure of that, you dont know what weapons we use yet, since there is more then just those 2 tanks you saw... also, we are using Gcombat08 and GCX right?
[url]http://steamcommunity.com/groups/risktoconquer[/url] [b]Everybody JOIN IT[/b]
[QUOTE=Karbinev2;14726231][url]http://steamcommunity.com/groups/risktoconquer[/url] [b]Everybody JOIN IT[/b][/QUOTE] ur an gaye
[QUOTE=megamadgamer;14725480] yes, she wil be seen on the battlefield. and i'm also working on a boat of 2, one of them is a black ops boat, with possible cloaking device. and i am yet to talk about this with nardix, but maybe we could consider being an ally with the UK team? and before i forget to mention, the current weight without the main turret or other compartments is at 32 tons. she wil not go beyond 25 MpH she is also at her prop limit for the server i'm building her on, which is 100. i wil move her to a different server, where we work on her with 3 to 4 people we both rule on the water, and are building some serious firepower[/QUOTE] Jesus, if you get that thing to turn, id be suprised. wait, 100 props for that? really? have you ever seen tiled models? I could build that w/ less than 20!
[QUOTE=megamadgamer;14725480]i somehow get a feeling mine is bigger... yes, she wil be seen on the battlefield. and i'm also working on a boat of 2, one of them is a black ops boat, with possible cloaking device. and i am yet to talk about this with nardix, but maybe we could consider being an ally with the UK team? and before i forget to mention, the current weight without the main turret or other compartments is at 32 tons. she wil not go beyond 25 MpH she is also at her prop limit for the server i'm building her on, which is 100. i wil move her to a different server, where we work on her with 3 to 4 people we both rule on the water, and are building some serious firepower[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Rocketracer4;14726974]Jesus, if you get that thing to turn, id be suprised. wait, 100 props for that? really? have you ever seen tiled models? I could build that w/ less than 20![/QUOTE] I wouldn't even build such a thing, since it would be slaughtered before it can even hit something... bonus: "Deutsch-Ingenieur Karbine: i don't even know what the hell that is" lololoololol.
say whatever you like, we are stil building her, and from what i have seen during a damage test with no armor, she wil hold her own...
Of course she'll hold on her own! She'll lag out all other players, eliminating all competition. Edit: I get the feeling that Sax agrees with me a lot on this thread...
[QUOTE=megamadgamer;14725480]i somehow get a feeling mine is bigger...[/QUOTE] I somehow get a feeling that this is not tank at all, but spam of badly used phx.
that is a box with wheels in the corner-fail.
[QUOTE=megamadgamer;14727466]say whatever you like, we are stil building her...[/QUOTE] Whoa. That made me think of all those super tank and war machine prototypes germans never used. But I'm afraid we might have to encounter this thing on a battlefield... [B]...AND THEN BLOW IT TO PIECES, MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...[/B]
it looks like that yes, but like i said before, we rather have out machine be funtional, rather then look good. in the box, i can put a hell load of wire and other goodies, so dont you guys worry and keep on shouting at me that is a box on wheels, i dont mind at all. but dont go crying HAXXORRRZZZZ when you leave the battlefield in pieces...
Don't you come crying when we use your tank as a big bullseye for aircrafts... "Uh, that's a negative, Joazzz, air support is on hold until lagspikes are clear." SHEEEEET....!
Functionality includes reducing lag.
the world of parrenting, as soon as i master it a bit better...
[QUOTE=Satyria;14728423]Functionality includes reducing lag.[/QUOTE] Win.
[QUOTE=megamadgamer;14728445]the world of parrenting, as soon as i master it a bit better...[/QUOTE] Parenting tool and a wire chip. Voilá. [QUOTE=Satyria;14728423]Functionality includes reducing lag.[/QUOTE] This. [B]THIS.[/B]
gagh, there is no arquing with you guys, its 4/5 to 1 here, i'm laying off this thread untill i finish that monster qapla!
[rant]I have been away for a while and I come back. I just read almost everyone of megamadgamer's posts. He truly is an idiot I'm sorry to say. You "huge" tank base is phx props spammed together. Its an easy target and couldn't even defend from a heavy tank. You think you are god's gift to gmod because you boast "functionality" but we have yet to see it. All we have seen are some really crappy pics of your "huge tank" chassis which looks bad and I would assume performs poorly also. The only reason that I am saying all of this is because you actually think your better than everyone else. Your trying to tell woodchuck that HIS contraption is something that you think it is. I am tired of you thinking that because we can make our contraptions looks awesome means that they don't work. Really? You think that you are the best of the best. Most people can make something that looks and functions good too. You can easily make something that works amazingly then make it look good too. You just don't understand that. That is why people keep saying that your contraption looks like crap. Because it is crap. It may work right but I bet people would rather have somethings that works just as well and looks cool too.[/rant] Not trying to flame. Just put him in his place
[QUOTE=Dohner;14728758][rant]I have been away for a while and I come back. I just read almost everyone of megamadgamer's posts. He truly is an idiot I'm sorry to say. You "huge" tank base is phx props spammed together. Its an easy target and couldn't even defend from a heavy tank. You think you are god's gift to gmod because you boast "functionality" but we have yet to see it. All we have seen are some really crappy pics of your "huge tank" chassis which looks bad and I would assume performs poorly also. The only reason that I am saying all of this is because you actually think your better than everyone else. Your trying to tell woodchuck that HIS contraption is something that you think it is. I am tired of you thinking that because we can make our contraptions looks awesome means that they don't work. Really? You think that you are the best of the best. Most people can make something that looks and functions good too. You can easily make something that works amazingly then make it look good too. You just don't understand that. That is why people keep saying that your contraption looks like crap. Because it is crap. It may work right but I bet people would rather have somethings that works just as well and looks cool too.[/rant] Not trying to flame. Just put him in his place[/QUOTE] :D and satyria why do you have a hard on? :S
[QUOTE=woodchuck34;14728849]:D and satyria why do you have a hard on? :S[/QUOTE] Because I hadn't realized up untill you posted those pics of that apc how fukken sexy it was. I mean, I would have built it if you hadn't already! Unfortunately, cars aint my thing... But that's something I'd concider giving a go at.
[QUOTE=megamadgamer;14714415]you do know what apc stands for do you? armored personal carrier. means it needs to have some serious armor, and a weapon to boot. now the weapon can be a normal .50 cal or a 20mm bushmaster autocannon, but the armor needs to be serious. so that car stil remains what i said it was, ASV[/QUOTE] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dzik-3.jpg[/url] [quote]File links The following pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file (pages on other projects are not listed): * Iraqi Army * AMZ Dzik * Battle of Basra (2008) * Armoured personnel carrier [/quote] Looks pretty similar to what chuck made. [QUOTE=megamadgamer;14728299]it looks like that yes, but like i said before, we rather have out machine be funtional, rather then look good. in the box, i can put a hell load of wire and other goodies, so dont you guys worry and keep on shouting at me that is a box on wheels, i dont mind at all. but dont go crying HAXXORRRZZZZ when you leave the battlefield in pieces...[/QUOTE] Get off your high horse, at several points in the thread you've attempted, and failed to discredit what other people say - I'm not taking sides in this argument about your vehicle*, but your attitude is really getting on my nerves. Edit: [QUOTE=megamadgamer;14663135]sorry for double post, but i cannot let this go un awnsered. server might need to raise max prop count, since this will easily pass 200 parts. the armor allone on some points will be as much as 4 flat stacked phx 1x1 plates! and weight? lets just say, it can roll over anything it wants.[/QUOTE] I'm pretty sure this competiton won't feature vehicles of that class, and if it does it will most likely be going up against vehicles of similar dimensions.
[QUOTE=megamadgamer;14725557]so have i, but i have to stick to prop limits, if i had no limit, she would be about the size of a warship on land... :ninja:[/QUOTE] Oh also, stop reffering to it as 'She' and 'her', it's really annoying. Mechanical vehicles do not have gender. The correct pronoun would be 'It'.
im just saying - just cause your shit apparently has functionality, im 100% positive that the shit we have has better functionality, mk?
[QUOTE=Morbo!!!;14729244][url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dzik-3.jpg[/url] Looks pretty similar to what chuck made. Get off your high horse, at several points in the thread you've attempted, and failed to discredit what other people say - I'm not taking sides in this argument about your vehicle*, but your attitude is really getting on my nerves. Edit: I'm pretty sure this competiton won't feature vehicles of that class, and if it does it will most likely be going up against vehicles of similar dimensions.[/QUOTE] :iceburn: :iceburn: :iceburn: thanks for the backup buddy :D
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.