Two American Friends Fight Through Germany Together - Garry's Mod

[QUOTE=BlackRazor88;18053987]Rooftop, its skyspace[/QUOTE] that's not a valid excuse. put something [B]else[/B] there. just because it's "skyspace" doesn't mean you can overblow the highlights and make it look like shit. [quote]Take it up with the model porters[/quote] no, i'm taking it up with [B]you.[/B] as the screenshot creator it's [B]your job[/B] to make an angle and pose that displays fluidity and natural motion. not the model porter's. [quote]How so[/quote] how so? do you live in california or some third world country where it never snows? it looks [B]nothing[/B] like snow. i'm not going to sit here and provide a detailed analysis on why it doesn't look like snow--try actually [B]looking[/B] at it. [quote]Explain further[/quote] i don't need to explain further than [B]bow legged posing.[/B] gee, what's that mean? it means they're fucking bow legged. if you don't know what it means, google it. [quote]Why not? He is at rest[/quote] he's at rest, holding a 13 lb rifle completely vertical with [B]nothing resting on the buttstock[/B]? what is wrong with you? [quote]I can't do much about the fingers.. again take it up with the modellers[/quote] again, it's [B]your job[/B] to make it look good. besides, you're the one that posed the fingers. not the porters.

[QUOTE=BlackRazor88;18054130]Then why does he use the exact same highlight-random-crap-everywhere-in-the-same-font-in-different-colors-nit-pick-about-everything C&C that you do? It would appear just about all of your old accounts links are broken.. trying to find a comparison as I type this[/QUOTE] because anyone can do the shit that i do? you don't have to dig up shit because nothing you find will indicate that you're right

FYI the snow was from a picture.. so real life isn't good enough for you now eh? :v: and now that I recall correctly he isn't Angry Baker.. hes the little Toadie that copied Angry Baker's every action.. Rubs Glue was the name back then I believe

[QUOTE=BlackRazor88;18054236]FYI the snow was from a picture.. so real life isn't good enough for you now eh? :v:[/quote] just because it came from a picture doesn't mean it looks good/real. [quote]and now that I recall correctly he isn't Angry Baker.. hes the little Toadie that copied Angry Baker's every action.. Rubs Glue was the name back then I believe[/QUOTE] rubs glue was me, not angry baker. good job. by the way, i enjoy the fact you completely tip toed around the rest of my criticism.

Ok, now that he has been dealt with, can we please get back on topic.

Yes. Stop derailing and actually provide criticism.

[QUOTE=idclippro;18054268]just because it came from a picture doesn't mean it looks good/real. rubs glue was me, not angry baker. good job. by the way, i enjoy the fact you completely tip toed around the rest of my criticism.[/QUOTE] By tip-toed do you mean I simply took it and felt no need to make a comment? And photographs aren't real? I am amazed at what you will consider real then Meh.. ninjad ignore this post..

[QUOTE=grea$emonkey;18054302]Yes. Stop derailing and actually provide criticism.[/QUOTE] i'm pretty sure you banned the only one capable of providing competent criticism. [QUOTE=paul bunyan;18052808]good lighting and coloring. that's about it [/QUOTE] [QUOTE=paul bunyan;18053153] i gave you constructive criticism by telling you that your posing is bad. i don't have to indicate what's bad because the pose itself is horrid - not just one part. the legs are posed like he's trying to do a jimmy hindrix chicken dance and the guy holding the thompson has the worst hand posing ever made plus he's hunched like he has back problems and can't be in the army (or airborne) in the first place [/QUOTE] [editline]09:17PM[/editline] [QUOTE=BlackRazor88;18054313] And photographs aren't real? I am amazed at what you will consider real then [/QUOTE] when did i say photographs weren't real? i'm saying just because something is [B]taken from a photograph and put into a screenshot taken from a video game[/B] doesn't mean [B]in the instance it's used[/B] it will look good.

[QUOTE=idclippro;18054346]i'm pretty sure you banned the only one capable of providing competent criticism.[/QUOTE] The extent of his criticism was "bad posing." I wouldn't call that competent. Anyways, I like the screenshot. The gun positions and finger-posing are off, but at first glance it looked nice.

There is nothing wrong with the posing save the lead hand on the Thompson. The rifleman is running while hugging the ground as he is under fire. You have either never watched a WW2 movie or ever seen anyone run in such a way as to stay low. Other than that, I see nothing wrong with it, although my opinion may be a bit bias.

[QUOTE=idclippro;18054346]i'm pretty sure you banned the only one capable of providing competent criticism.[/QUOTE] You might have given constructive criticism in your mind if by that you mean bash the maker until they make some ridiculously high quality professional photo someone would pay for to the point of making nobody want to make screenshots.. sometimes just giving tips is fine.. but the way you two give constructive criticism is just plain rude, and commonly referred to as trolling (which is why you were banned previously.. and yet again..) If that is the only way you know how to give C&C then perhaps you should apply for a job at a professional art firm and see how long you last.. go ahead.. I'm actually encouraging you to do so. Not everyone here is as good as The Vman, MasterFGH, Uberslug etc but that doesn't mean they are instantly awful and should discontinue the hobby, to be honest.. that should encourage users to work harder and learn more.. Oh my... page 2.. this really has gone quite far.. and I am going to have to agree with greasemonkey

[QUOTE=Ham_Wallet;18054384]There is nothing wrong with the posing save the lead hand on the Thompson. The rifleman is running while hugging the ground as he is under fire. You have either never watched a WW2 movie or ever seen anyone run in such a way as to stay low. Other than that, I see nothing wrong with it, although my opinion may be a bit bias.[/QUOTE] I was referring the the guy in the background. Also, the mid-running pose sorta looks off-balance. That's just my opinion though.

[QUOTE=grea$emonkey;18054441]I was referring the the guy in the background. Also, the mid-running pose sorta looks off-balance. That's just my opinion though.[/QUOTE] I blame that on the angle of the shot, he is on a very slight tilt towards the camera. Had the picture been taken from another angle it may have made more sense.

[QUOTE=grea$emonkey;18054441]I was referring the the guy in the background. Also, the mid-running pose sorta looks off-balance. That's just my opinion though.[/QUOTE] Agreed.. some of the posing is a wee bit iffy.. but nobody is perfect

[QUOTE=grea$emonkey;18054382]The extent of his criticism was "bad posing." I wouldn't call that competent.[/quote] did you read the second quote or did you just skim through my post like you have for this thread's entirety? [quote]Anyways, I like the screenshot. The gun positions and finger-posing are off, but at first glance it looked nice.[/QUOTE] [B]i wouldn't call this competent, you aren't being detailed enough.[/B] the finger posing is "off", what do you mean by that? how is he supposed to improve if all you're saying is that it's "off"? [QUOTE=BlackRazor88;18054388]perhaps you should apply for a job at a professional art firm and see how long you last.. go ahead.. I'm actually encouraging you to do so[/QUOTE] i skimmed through your post because it's the same garbage you've been posting throughout the thread; there's no need to regurgitate your points--i've already responded to them. i'd just like to say i [B]am[/B] employed in the professional art field, and i've yet to be laid off.

[QUOTE=idclippro;18054479]did you read the second quote or did you just skim through my post like you have for this thread's entirety?[/QUOTE] He wasn't banned for not giving good enough criticism. He was banned for the last sentence of his post. Which in retrospect is more like flaming, but same punishment nonetheless.

i skimmed through your post because it's the same garbage you've been posting throughout the thread; there's no need to regurgitate your points--i've already responded to them. i'd just like to say i [B]am[/B] employed in the professional art field, and i've yet to be laid off.[/QUOTE] Of course its garbage to you because you simply don't understand that fine art (that you supposedly work in the field of) and a screenshot from a GAME don't have to be the SAME [QUOTE=grea$emonkey;18054509]He wasn't banned for not giving good enough criticism. He was banned for the last sentence of his post. Which in retrospect is more like flaming, but same punishment nonetheless.[/QUOTE] No offence to you.. but he will have an alt account soon enough.. these two always do..

This doesn't do the pose a ton of justice but you see what I am talking about, from that angle it looks really odd... From this angle it looks a lot less odd. [IMG]http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/8032/gmflatgrass20080005.jpg[/IMG]

[QUOTE=Ham_Wallet;18054565]This doesn't do the pose a ton of justice but you see what I am talking about, from that angle it looks really odd... From this angle it looks a lot less odd. [IMG]http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/8032/gmflatgrass20080005.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] At that angle the guy would definitely fall over. But again, that's only my opinion.

[QUOTE=grea$emonkey;18054509]He wasn't banned for not giving good enough criticism. He was banned for the last sentence of his post. Which in retrospect is more like flaming, but same punishment nonetheless.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=BlackRazor88;18053585] I've seen paul's posing.. its awful and downright stupid in my opinion [/QUOTE] trolling/flaming [QUOTE=BlackRazor88;18053808] gotta love the search feature [img]http://filesmelt.com/downloader/searchfeatureisawesome.jpg[/img] you sure do post in strange places...[/QUOTE] homophobia/flaming so tell me, why isn't [B]he[/B] banned?

[QUOTE=idclippro;18054587]trolling/flaming homophobia/flaming so tell me, why isn't [B]he[/B] banned?[/QUOTE] I didn't see those because I didn't read the entire thread. It was reported. If you see people breaking rules, report them.

[QUOTE=idclippro;18054587]trolling/flaming homophobia/flaming so tell me, why isn't [B]he[/B] banned?[/QUOTE] First is my own personal opinion.. yes I think the Gustave poses are cartoony and ridiculous And the second.. how is that homophobia or flaming..? I have nothing against gay people as long as they keep it to themselves and such and don't use it for attention.. and the flaming bit..? isn't the video pictured a tool of flaming itself?

[QUOTE=grea$emonkey;18054620]I didn't see those because I didn't read the entire thread. [/QUOTE] thank you, greasemonkey. that was my point. [QUOTE=BlackRazor88;18054630]First is my own personal opinion..[/quote] it's your personal opinion so it can't be flaming? sorry, [B]but that's what flaming is. an opinion.[/B] [quote]And the second.. how is that homophobia or flaming..?[/QUOTE] you're implying it's wrong to be homosexual. don't even tip toe around it, it's obvious.

[QUOTE=idclippro;18054652]thank you, greasemonkey. that was my point. it's your personal opinion so it can't be flaming? sorry, [B]but that's what flaming is. an opinion.[/B] you're implying it's wrong to be homosexual. don't even tip toe around it, it's obvious.[/QUOTE] That's enough. Drop the subject before I hand out derailment bans. If you have member related issues, PM a mod or report them.

Seriously guys, stop spamming the crap out of this thread, take it to PM.

[QUOTE=idclippro;18054652]thank you, greasemonkey. that was my point. it's your personal opinion so it can't be flaming? sorry, [B]but that's what flaming is. an opinion.[/B] you're implying it's wrong to be homosexual. don't even tip toe around it, it's obvious.[/QUOTE] Its a personal opinion yes.. but I am not pressing it upon others and trying to de-rail this thread purposely.. I am defending the original poster who was wrongly persecuted by Baker And if you read.. I have nothing against homosexuals Gah.. ninjad by Greasemonkey again... ending this

[QUOTE=paul bunyan;18053898]also, your "recent" pictures are [i]still[/i] terrible compared to my masterpieces[/QUOTE] Bit full of ourselves now aren't we.

So what he's not hanging on to the Thompson completely whoopde freaking do. Huge issue right? I like the pic, only thing I don't like is where the sparks are coming from there isn't any mark of any kind that a bullet or anything has hit the tank. Way to go Ham.

[QUOTE=idclippro;18053928]okay. way too much white space posing is stiff snow looks like someone just scratched up a photograph bow legged posing guy on the right: [B]no one[/B] holds rifles like that. also his finger is way too curved if you want me to go into more detail and make a paintover for you, i can.[/QUOTE] The snow is actually pretty good, you don't know what the fuck your talkin' about. :fuckoff:

is it just me or is that a german tank they're standing infront of?