[QUOTE=Rastifan;42715232]I disagree. Bad models perhaps, but not bad textures. Less you can show me a Source model with more detailed hand texture than this.[/QUOTE]
i don't think anyone cares/wants to.
[QUOTE=Rastifan;42715232]I disagree. Bad models perhaps, but not bad textures. Less you can show me a Source model with more detailed hand texture than this.[/QUOTE]
Yeah because comparing basic source textures that were created years beforehand with [I]optimization[/I] in mind and not being [I]ugly, gritty, unrealistic textures that are far too big, and a poor representation of any type of cloth that ever existed[/I] that don't make any sense what so ever in any sort of universe besides anime for awkward pre-teens discovering their repressed sexuality is totally the way to go about this.
The textures are bloody awful, have you ever been able to see the stitching and threading of a shirt like that with your bare eyes like that? It looks like she made that shirt out of dirty gauze.
after a year away
lebowski is back
[QUOTE=Lebowski;42715305]textures that are far too big.[/QUOTE]
Yea about that. I get the feeling that half the rage is from people who lacked the system to run the CM mods and decided to hate his stuff because of it.
Ridiculous demands I know. 4 gig of memory and all. But bloody awful can be applied to a lot of the stuff I have seen released here since 2009. So why this focus on FF?
I think he made something that had an impact on the Source community. That is why people care about this for better or worse. If it was just shitty models, no one would raise an eye brow.
level of detail != quality
ever
[QUOTE=Rastifan;42715414]Yea about that. I get the feeling that half the rage is from people who lacked the system to run the CM mods and decided to hate his stuff because of it.
Ridiculous demands I know. 4 gig of memory and all. But bloody awful can be applied to a lot of the stuff I have seen released here since 2009. So why this focus on FF?[/QUOTE]
Yeah, some people couldn't run it really that well.
I ran it just fine on the other hand.
There's a certain point where the resolution is just superfluous and it just serves to bulk up the download and loading times.
Also frankly, yeah if I showed you any source texture it wouldn't be as high resolution; and once again, frankly, contrary to popular belief; not everyone wants to see them pores on they skin.
They're ugly, impractical and horribly bulky and I don't entirely appreciate you cherry picking out of my replies so you have an easier time replying.
Either address the whole issue at hand and actually [I]debate[/I] it, otherwise the majority of people (and myself) are going to remain unconvinced that this puffy-nippled monstrosity is nothing more than some german thief's ugly high-resolution wank-dream.
Use it if you want, I'm not your mother; the thing is just a bloody eyesore.
[QUOTE=Lebowski;42715502]Either address the whole issue at hand and actually [I]debate[/I] it, otherwise the majority of people (and myself) are going to remain unconvinced that this puffy-nippled monstrosity is nothing more than some german thief's ugly high-resolution wank-dream.[/QUOTE]
I believed that was what we were doing. Just because I don't quote your entire post does not mean I am cherry picking you know.
Just emphasising a certain point.
learn some techniques other than shefing the hell out of pictures of mutants, broski
that's some thick toilet paper she's wearing
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
