I don't think it's humanly possible to be as bad as Kurit. I don't know who 69105 is so I can't really pass any sort of opinion, but I read Kurit's stuff. It was just... wow, seriously wow. Additionally, does this argument really need a constant reaffirmation by the public with each new post made? Can't you guys just take this to PMs, ignore list each other, or maybe just let it go entirely?
[QUOTE=TheWildGrue;24961615]I don't think it's humanly possible to be as bad as Kurit. I don't know who 69105 is so I can't really pass any sort of opinion, but I read Kurit's stuff. It was just... wow, seriously wow. Additionally, does this argument really need a constant reaffirmation by the public with each new post made? Can't you guys just take this to PMs, ignore list each other, or maybe just let it go entirely?[/QUOTE]
Welcome to Facepunch.
[QUOTE=Stopper;24961614]You do realize that your acts are a result of who you are?[/QUOTE]
No, not really. Someone can be a real asshole, and once you get to know him, he's a very nice boyo, in the other hand, someone can act real nice and in fact be a fucking retard. You can't judge someone's personality by their acts, this is much more complex.
[QUOTE=bubbagamer;24961463]Oh wait yes, I forgot the Snowflakes and Mr. Strawman arguments, those were fucking brillant and really showed how much of an intelligent guy you are. Why do I even bother, you're exactly like 69015 and Kurit.[/QUOTE]
Okay no, comparing anyone to Kurit is like saying that he's a complete retard and douchebag. That guy praised himself as being the most amazing at everything and completely ignored and dismissed anyone who even tried to criticize his stuff. I'm sorry, but I don't see rossum or 69015 doing any of those things.
[QUOTE=Stopper;24961654]Welcome to Facepunch.[/QUOTE]
I'm beginning to regret breaking my vow of lurking only already.
[QUOTE=bubbagamer;24961659]No, not really. Someone can be a real asshole, and once you get to know him, he's a very nice boyo, in the other hand, someone can act real nice and in fact be a fucking retard. You can't judge someone's personality by their acts, this is much more complex.[/QUOTE]
If I'm an asshole here, than that must be triggered by something I am in real life.
For instance, if someone acts like a tough guy on the internet, he is probably a fucking pathetic piece of shit in real life. Your actions are defined by who you are.
[QUOTE=Stopper;24961711]If I'm an asshole here, than that must be triggered by something I am in real life.
For instance, if someone acts like a tough guy on the internet, he is probably a fucking pathetic piece of shit in real life. Your actions are defined by who you are.[/QUOTE]
Get some sources, because I know a shitload of living examples that contradict this statement.
[QUOTE=bubbagamer;24961769]Get some sources, because I know a shitload of living examples that contradict this statement.[/QUOTE]
I should get some sources? Yeah, I'll just... Erm... Take photographs of some people? Or maybe give you a link to a scientific research?
:downs:
That's what I thought. There's 6 billions of you and me out there, I don't think we all act tough on the net because we're being beatten at school.
[QUOTE=bubbagamer;24961816]That's what I thought. There's 6 billions of you and me out there, I don't think we all act tough on the net because we're being beaten at school.[/QUOTE]
I'm going to take a turn here and ask you for a source on your information. I want some scientific research data, preferably made by someone qualified. Piecharts are nice too.
:downs:
If you didn't get my point now, I'd look really stupid.
Jesus fuck guys
stop
posting
Haha, you got me. Well technically not, reminds me of someone from here who tried to make me believe there was second explosion in Tchernobyl in 2006, not in STALKER, IRL.
Told him it was bullshit, he asked me some proofs... how am I supposed to prove something that never happened? :v:
Got my point now?
[QUOTE=bubbagamer;24961928]Haha, you got me. Well technically not, reminds me of someone from here who tried to make me believe there was second explosion in Tchernobyl in 2006, not in STALKER, IRL.
Told him it was bullshit, he asked me some proofs... how am I supposed to prove something that never happened? :v:
Got my point now?[/QUOTE]
So you can't prove something that's true over something that's false?
To respond to your example: show him information that the Chernobyl NPP's second reactor is infact, intact.
You can, but good luck searching an article on the net saying there was no Tchernobyl explosion in 2006.
[QUOTE=bubbagamer;24962037]You can, but good luck searching an article on the net saying there was no Tchernobyl explosion in 2006.[/QUOTE]
Uh
I don't understand your point.
[QUOTE=Loen;24962050]Uh
I don't understand your point.[/QUOTE]
Someone asked me to find a clear and serious article that says there was no explosion in 2006.
Also I'll just stop posting here since the argument is over. (well there's nothing much more to say)
[QUOTE=Loen;24962050]Uh
I don't understand your point.[/QUOTE]
He was saying that you can't provide source that something didn't happen, since if it didn't happen, there isn't going to be anything pointing to that it didn't happen.
I love this picture.
I love this thread.
[QUOTE=bubbagamer;24962037]You can, but good luck searching an article on the net saying there was no Tchernobyl explosion in 2006.[/QUOTE]
It's spelled Chernobyl.
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_after_the_disaster[/url]
Hahahah two pages in an hour. Nice goin.
[QUOTE=simkas;24962088]He was saying that you can't provide source that something didn't happen, since if it didn't happen, there isn't going to be anything pointing to that it didn't happen.[/QUOTE]
I can point out pretty easily when something didn't happen through the stuff that [i]did[/i] happen.
[QUOTE=Loen;24962403]I can point out pretty easily when something didn't happen through the stuff that [i]did[/i] happen.[/QUOTE]
Drop it, that's not the point. Anyway yeah, Chernobyl, always get confused (it's Tchernobyl in French)
a strawman is a recognised term, i suggest you look it up. snowflakes is just slang i pulled from somewhere else; strawman is not.
comparing me or 5omeone to kurit is stupid. i don't go out of my way to act like god's gift. i don't viciously defend people from criticism (that's what you do). i don't make like six alts to try and prove some stupid, childish point. i didn't compare you to him even though out of the two of us you're the closer (though still nowhere near, nobody even approaches him), so it says a lot you did so for me.
i don't see anything else relevant or even logical, so consider me done. argue further and all you'll do is prove my point that you're just as bad as you think i am. laters all!
also, i compartmentalise (unlike most irrational, emotional people). don't expect me to be a dick unless this is brought up, since it's not relevant in any other discussion. whether or not i can trust the same from you, i don't know.
Right through his pants
You are wrong for adding some more wood in this argument fire, as for your statements, I can't tell since I'm involved.
Art is art. I think it's very nice, good job.
[QUOTE=bubbagamer;24967869]You are wrong for adding some more wood in this argument fire, as for your statements, I can't tell since I'm involved.[/QUOTE]
yeah i'm calling it a day, let's go shitpost in some other thread and let everyone else do whatever in here. apparently the argument goes on whether we're here or not.
And for once I agree with you.
i'm about to rip some know-it-all cadet (like there's any other kind) a new one in another thread, you can rush to his defence if you want. then again, you could watch the military pecking order in action!!!
sf shits on regs, regs shit on reserves, everyone shits on cadets
woot
what the Christ... You people just can't get enough.
200 new post...
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
