• Screenshot Section Chat Thread V9: A shithouse thread for shithouse people
    4,998 replies, posted
[QUOTE=rama2299;49749022]so I was talking to an old friend, and out of nowhere he told me he started to cheat ('dont tell her btw') on his gf, but I do also know her since a long time ago. i feel like I need to tell her, but at the same time I don't want to fail him since he's a really good friend fuckin relationship problems, the hell I'm supposed to do now[/QUOTE] tell him to quit being a fucking cheating dirtbag scumbag sleazeball
haaa eastern european tour this June, i'll try not to die
[QUOTE=Joazzz;49749062]haaa eastern european tour this June, i'll try not to die[/QUOTE] [media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBhh23-paLU[/media]
yeah I'm trying to convince him to not do that and stay with her, but he says that while he's bored with the relationship, he doesn't wants to break up (in response to noofa's n' F T comment :P )
[QUOTE=rama2299;49749096]yeah I'm trying to convince him to not do that and stay with her, but he says that while he's bored with the relationship, he doesn't wants to break up (in response to noofa's n' F T comment :P )[/QUOTE] he can't have one foot there and one foot in someone else's home. if he's bored of the relationship, he has to break up. cheating is a very slimy thing to do, and the fact he's knowingly comitting it makes it worse. if you cant convince him to stop being a scumbag, you may have to tell his GF and cut ties with him because good friends are responsible for eachother and hold eachother accountable for everything that they do.
I'll try and see how goes, just hoping that everything ends well after this...
[QUOTE=Fredrika;49746436]Who wants to test these, releasing them soon. [t]http://images.akamai.steamusercontent.com/ugc/320123574744076206/ADBF1783158DC4082FB3C4D1BA87FBCAF2E2DDF0/[/t] PM, steam, or reply.....[/QUOTE] you fuck why arent you online
Is it normal for people under 25 and barely/not out of post secondary education to be getting married? Not that I'm being judgemental, I thought getting married was for old people.
[QUOTE=Alsojames;49750070]Is it normal for people under 25 and barely/not out of post secondary education to be getting married? Not that I'm being judgemental, I thought getting married was for old people.[/QUOTE] Usually 25-30 is when women marry I think. Met a girl today who got engaged at 24. If you think about it, college is the best time to pick someone up for life because later on it'll be bars & random encounters and you never know then.
[QUOTE=Alrækinn;49747751]In the mass sea of everything on youtube this honestly isn't that unusual. I mean There's an audience for everything on youtube. Technology take aparts, shit gamers, creepy pasta readings, unboxings, etc. Basically stop looking for things to be pissed about, it just ends with you being pissed, and at the end of the day the channel is still there.[/QUOTE] I dunno about you but I can complain about shit I see on the internet without getting "pissed".
Hey guys, I'm not a native English speaker and I would like to understand some definitions which relate to Garry's mod and scenebuilding in general. First of all, we all know that on this forum we can read "screenshot" word written on many thread titles or forum section, screenshots are taken from garry's mod, so in screenshots we show scenebuilds, is it correct to say that way ? Or we don't call and post screenshots, just call it a scenebuild and post scenebuilds after all ? Second, some scenebuilds show us complex scenes which include posing, build props, effect props and so on. Do you think if there's only ragdoll posing we'd call it more specifically as a posing, posescene or scenepose, posing scene or posing scenebuild ? Or maybe it is still just a scenebuild that is focused more on posing rather than prop builds ? Third, we all use a console command "poster" in Garry's mod, so I noticed on some forums people use a poster definition instead of scenebuild or screenshot, what do you think of that ? Is it appropriate to say that, do you think it's totally fine on a par with a scenebuild definition ? In this case there's another important possible definition, a sceneposter ? What do you think of that ? Fourth, what do you think is the best common definition that would combine all other minor definitions together 1. Scenebuild (Scenebuilding) 2. Poster 3. Sceneposter 4. screenshot 5. Your personal suggestion Thank you.
We dont really use those "defintions" we just pose something and call it a pose/a scenebuild if its one.
The way I see it, regardless of the contents, every picture posted here (with a few rare exceptions) is a screenshot. Because it's a screenshot taken of something you posed/made in Garry's Mod/SFM. The rare exceptions are where they've been so heavily painted over or edited that it may as well not be the original picture anymore. A "poster" is just where you use the "poster" command in console to make a bigger version, but when you really think about it, it's still pretty much just a screenshot. Scenebuilds are where you build a set on an empty map instead of using an existing map as your backdrop, and then you take a screenshot of that. Everyone has their own preferences for what to call things, I don't think there is any kind of terminology set in stone for the community and I don't really think there should be.
posters are basically screenshots, poster is just a console command for a high res screenshot. I'd say if a screenshot does not have any or only a couple of props and focuses on a character, it's just a pose. If it has a pose in it but the pose is dwarfed by the size or detail of the scene you'd call it a scenebuild I guess.
It's kinda useless though if you use ingame bloom or colour correction [editline]16th February 2016[/editline] Poster 2 is twice your resolution and so forth.
Poster 666 would this crash gmod [editline]16th February 2016[/editline] and maybe bring hell on earth
[QUOTE=F T;49754690]Poster 666 would this crash gmod [editline]16th February 2016[/editline] and maybe bring hell on earth[/QUOTE] Everything will burst into flames.
Fantastic time to get sick.
[QUOTE=Slim Charles;49754595]It's kinda useless though if you use ingame bloom or colour correction [editline]16th February 2016[/editline] Poster 2 is twice your resolution and so forth.[/QUOTE] Also SDoF doesn't work with it.
I definitely recommend using 'poster 2' command. Going beyond poster 2 to 3 provides fewer benefits when you ultimately shrink down the image. I think I'll make a tutorial on this.
[QUOTE=RyanH;49754695]Everything will burst into flames.[/QUOTE] Only if you use nvidia.
anything past poster 2 and you will see the beautiful argument nVidia and Valve had come to life (bits and pieces of clothing missing at a distance)
[QUOTE=McTbone;49754901](bits and pieces of clothing missing at a distance)[/QUOTE]what
Here's a pic for comparison purposes. What I usually do when I take something with a poster command and how I make it less blurry: The 1,26,1 are the settings for accented edges (edge width, edge brightness, smoothness). [IMG]http://www.wduwant.com/index_uploads/uploads/50623fa42e43.jpg[/IMG] It's the first thing I do when I bring the pic into photoshop.
[QUOTE=Joazzz;49754943]what[/QUOTE] [img]https://i.gyazo.com/35a4b9dda13b2115998b03ea13c0a29b.png[/img] [img]https://i.gyazo.com/921ab5b9a07580d2e25e722cb90f9c2e.png[/img] it only started happening after switching to an nVidia card, balaclava looks like moths ate it at a decent distance and bits and pieces of clothing will be gone
I can confirm its an nvidia thing. Shadows are jagged too. I never had either of those problems when I was still using ATI cards.
does anyone remember this lmao [img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/25031534/thanksforyouranswer.png[/img] it still makes me laugh from time to time
holy shit that nVidia card thing is bullshit, i knew about the shadow fuck-up but never thought it would cause z-fighting like that what was the thing between Valve and nVidia that caused this?
In my case at least, every other game does that on an nvidia card too.
iirc they had a disagreement over half-life 2 or source about something [editline]16th February 2016[/editline] I'm not sure but according to the guy who made the Ugly Shadow Thread, he claimed shadows are the way they are because nVidia and VALVe got into a disagreement
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.