[QUOTE=ph0ne;20474674]Why are you talking about yourself?
I should report you for being a fanboy.[/QUOTE]
More proof of my point that you are a moron. :byewhore:
[QUOTE=ButtsexV2;20474669]First, did you get your i5 that high on stock cooling?[/QUOTE]
I didn't get it that far on stock cooling. I used a Coolermaster V8. Any extreme overclock should be done with a good aftermarket cooling solution, Intel OR AMD.
[QUOTE=ph0ne;20474674]I should report you for being a fanboy.[/QUOTE]
Likewise.
[QUOTE=ph0ne;20474711]I didn't get it that far on stock cooling. I used a [b]Coolermaster V8[/b]. Any [b]extreme overclock[/b] should be done with a good aftermarket cooling solution, Intel OR AMD.[/QUOTE]
Good Joke
[QUOTE=ph0ne;20474711]I didn't get it that far on stock cooling. I used a Coolermaster V8. Any extreme overclock should be done with a good aftermarket cooling solution, Intel OR AMD.[/QUOTE]
And the other person said he got his that high on stock.
[QUOTE=Wiggles;20474726]Likewise.[/QUOTE]
I'm not being a fanboy. I'm being truthful. It is a FACT that Intel has been consistenly outperforming AMD since 2005. Likewise, before that, AMD's CPUs were dominating the market.
[editline]05:32PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=ButtsexV2;20474745]And the other person said he got his that high on stock.[/QUOTE]
Ooh, 500MHz overclock, that's really high right guys?
[QUOTE=ph0ne;20474766]I'm not being a fanboy. I'm being truthful. It is a FACT that Intel has been consistenly outperforming AMD since 2005. Likewise, before that, AMD's CPUs were dominating the market.[/QUOTE]
Provide some compelling proof then, or be labelled a troll for all eternity.
OP is ignorant and a huge intel fanboy.
[QUOTE=ph0ne;20474766]I'm not being a fanboy. I'm being truthful. It is a FACT that Intel has been consistenly outperforming AMD since 2005. Likewise, before that, AMD's CPUs were dominating the market.
[editline]05:32PM[/editline]
Ooh, 500MHz overclock, that's really high right guys?[/QUOTE]
you try it on stock cooling.
I find this thread very funny.
I'm going buy AMD regardless of your sourceless-based information you posted.
[QUOTE=Wiggles;20474797]Provide some compelling proof then, or be labelled a troll for all eternity.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.techspot.com/review/193-intel-core-i5-750/[/url]
[url]http://www.guru3d.com/article/core-i5-750-core-i7-860-870-processor-review-test/1[/url]
[url]http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2009/09/08/intel-core-i5-and-i7-lynnfield-cpu-review/[/url]
[url]http://www.trustedreviews.com/cpu-memory/review/2009/09/08/Intel-Core-i7-870---Core-i5-750/[/url]
[editline]05:38PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=ButtsexV2;20474822]you try it on stock cooling.[/QUOTE]
I already did it when I first bought my i5.
[QUOTE=Dj-J3;20474820]OP is ignorant and a huge intel fanboy.[/QUOTE]
That's because he's trolling.
[QUOTE=Sodisna;20474852]I find this thread very funny.
I'm going buy AMD regardless of your sourceless-based information you posted.[/QUOTE]
You have effectively proven yourself to be a raging fanboy.
[editline]05:39PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=ghostofme;20474877]That's because he's trolling.[/QUOTE]
Funny how you'd enter this thread after you cried to me on Steam months ago.
You want unbiased sources, but you link techspot and guru3d?
How's that? I'm not a fanboy. If anything, you're more of fanboy than anyone else who's posted in this thread. I'm just going with what's cheaper. There's nothing wrong with that.
[QUOTE=ButtsexV2;20474932]You want unbiased sources, but you link techspot and guru3d?[/QUOTE]
My God, you are clueless.
[QUOTE=Sodisna;20474933]How's that? I'm not a fanboy. If anything, you're more of fanboy than anyone else who's posted in this thread. I'm just going with what's cheaper. There's nothing wrong with that.[/QUOTE]
Have fun settling for less all your life, considering Intel has defeated the AMD fanboy argument of price:performance with their new 32nm CPUs.
[QUOTE=ph0ne;20474961]My God, you are clueless.[/QUOTE]
You say that, but can you prove it?
[QUOTE=ph0ne;20474861][url]http://www.techspot.com/review/193-intel-core-i5-750/[/url]
[url]http://www.guru3d.com/article/core-i5-750-core-i7-860-870-processor-review-test/1[/url]
[url]http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2009/09/08/intel-core-i5-and-i7-lynnfield-cpu-review/[/url]
[url]http://www.trustedreviews.com/cpu-memory/review/2009/09/08/Intel-Core-i7-870---Core-i5-750/[/url][/QUOTE]
Clearly all biased sources. Obviously you're just going to pick ones that give the edge to Intel.
[QUOTE=ButtsexV2;20474990]You say that, but can you prove it?[/QUOTE]
Consistenly, Techspot and Guru3D have been bringing out unbiased reviews since they were established. Just read any of their reviews and you'll see what I mean. You talk of me citing biased sources, yet you linked me to Tom's Hardware, the most biased of all internet benchmarking sites.
I think everyone should drop this thread like its hot. He can't change your opinions and he won't change his.
[QUOTE=ph0ne;20475061]You talk of me citing biased sources, yet you linked me to Tom's Hardware, the most biased of all internet benchmarking sites.[/QUOTE]
lol
[QUOTE=Wiggles;20475033]Clearly all biased sources. Obviously you're just going to pick ones that give the edge to Intel.[/QUOTE]
No, I'm just picking ones at random when I was Googling reviews of the i5 750. Next thing I know, you're going to give me some AMD-sided reviews of the i5 750.
penis
[QUOTE=ph0ne;20474961]Have fun settling for less all your life, considering Intel has defeated the AMD fanboy argument of price:performance with their new 32nm CPUs.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I was unfortunate to not be rich enough to buy Intel.
And I was unfortunate to not be dumb enough to blow my money on stupid expensive parts.
[QUOTE=ButtsexV2;20475356]And I was unfortunate to not be dumb enough to blow my money on stupid expensive parts.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Sodisna;20475301]Yeah, I was unfortunate to not be rich enough to buy Intel.[/QUOTE]
Haven't I already established that the typical price:performance argument can't be used anymore?
Oh right, I have.
I was going to get a 965 for my budget build, but you've convinced me to spend another $150 extra dollars for a compatible motherboard that houses an i5. :downs:
wow, i was going to spend just £150 on a Phenom II 965 but you have convinced me to spend £300 on an i5 + DDR3 ram and a new motherboard, thanks op.
Thanks for restating what I just said, bro.
Ahhhh, no hard feelings.
mods sure are slow today
why is this thread even here, I'm sure this section was at least [I]that[/I] smart
[quote]Self confessed troll
Crap Thread
Attention whore
Trolling again[/quote]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.