[QUOTE=BananasGoMoo;18228127]ok well i explained it in a very detailed way and he's like "i dun get it". what would you do? repeat it till he gets it? that doesnt work.[/QUOTE]
Simply don't post anymore?
[QUOTE=j00g0t0wnd;18228762]Simply don't post anymore?[/QUOTE]
well i did end it after that post.
Until you brought it up again.
My results.
[img]http://i33.tinypic.com/161lq52.jpg[/img]
Draw your conclusions as you will.
[QUOTE=SGTNAPALM;18239116]My results.
[img]http://i33.tinypic.com/161lq52.jpg[/img]
Draw your conclusions as you will.[/QUOTE]
Wow IE8 is just embarrassing.
EDIT: Wait a minute... is higher better?
[QUOTE=Xplodzion;18239336]Wow IE8 is just embarrassing.
EDIT: Wait a minute... is higher better?[/QUOTE]
Higher is better.
Safari beating Firefox surprised me, too.
[QUOTE=SGTNAPALM;18239366]Higher is better.
Safari beating Firefox surprised me, too.[/QUOTE]
That didn't surprise me, Firefox has addons, while safari has no addons, which means less code, which means less time to execute the application, which means less time rendering pages.
Looks like they are already getting ready for 3.7, when I went to find a compatible appearance to chrome, on the addons it shows a 3.7 list.
[IMG]http://i38.tinypic.com/soqwpx.jpg[/IMG]
3.7 is labeled Minefield until all the functions are fixed.
[QUOTE=Unreliable;18239560]That didn't surprise me, Firefox has addons, while safari has no addons, which means less code, which means less time to execute the application, which means less time rendering pages.[/QUOTE]
I always do my tests with a clean firefox with no addons.
[QUOTE=SGTNAPALM;18239116]My results.
[img]http://i33.tinypic.com/161lq52.jpg[/img]
Draw your conclusions as you will.[/QUOTE]
This seems about right. This version of chrome does seem slightly faster than 3.6b1
I'm using 3.7, because of the 64-bit engine, pics now load 15% faster!
[QUOTE=GetOutOfBox;18245275]I'm using 3.7, because of the 64-bit engine, pics now load 15% faster![/QUOTE]
i'll use it when greasemonkey fixes itself.
What happened to middle click scrolling?
[QUOTE=Robber;18249960]What happened to middle click scrolling?[/QUOTE]
on what? i'm using firefox 3.5.5 and I still have it
i'm assuming you're referring to 3.6b1 or 3.7?
[QUOTE=Armyis1337;18249979]on what? i'm using firefox 3.5.5 and I still have it
i'm assuming you're referring to 3.6b1 or 3.7?[/QUOTE]
except it works in those too
[QUOTE=BananasGoMoo;18250085]except it works in those too[/QUOTE]
i haven't tried 3.6b1 or 3.7 yet :v
[QUOTE=Armyis1337;18250303]i haven't tried 3.6b1 or 3.7 yet :v[/QUOTE]
you should. :buddy:
[QUOTE=BananasGoMoo;18250517]you should. :buddy:[/QUOTE]
i think i'll go with 3.6b1, will probably be a bit more stable :D
Hrm, I installed it but in the About screen, it says it's version 3.5.5. Anybody else getting that?
Had to install an addon to get Image Properties back in the menu :frown:
[QUOTE=j00g0t0wnd;18251570]Hrm, I installed it but in the About screen, it says it's version 3.5.5. Anybody else getting that?[/QUOTE]
No. You probably had the downloads window open or another FF instance running when you launched the new one, so it just launched a new window of 3.5.5. Make sure firefox.exe is closed and that you're running the right executable, and it'll show as 3.6b1.
holy shit! never knew about it :wth: downloading!!! :buddy:
is it just me or is the latest minefield build not working.
[QUOTE=BananasGoMoo;18274627]is it just me or is the latest minefield build not working.[/QUOTE]
FlashGot was crashing it for me.
[QUOTE=gparent;18274835]FlashGot was crashing it for me.[/QUOTE]
hmmm, i'll try disabling stuff
EDIT: hyperwords doesnt work on the latest nightly.
EDIT2: it works again.
Wonder if it can yank me off Chrome again.
-downloads-
A new update was just released. It's now in Beta 2. They've now added the properties thing back into the browser and have fixed over 190 bugs.
Thread title updated accordingly
Is there a way to lower the scroll speed? For some reason it's really fast for me.
Eh screw it, I'll just go back to 3.5
Seriously, what's up with the non-existing image properties since 3.6b1? :|
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.