• DX11 What To Expect! (AMD)
    135 replies, posted
[url]http://anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3635[/url]
i'm still waiting for games to utilize dx10 more...
This is.... GREAT! But CPU will bottleneck hard. :(
[QUOTE=Foda;17230172]i'm still waiting for games to utilize dx10 more...[/QUOTE] Don't hold your breath. DX11 is shaping up to be the next DX9.
[QUOTE=Pandamobile;17232604]Don't hold your breath. DX11 is shaping up to be the next DX9.[/QUOTE] No it's shaping up to be over hyped by the people who know nothing about it.
The only part I am really excited for is that 4xAA is now mandatory, and Luishi likes his anti-aliasing!
When's this console generation supposed to end? 2013? The computing power differences between PC's and consoles is more evident than ever... The PS3 and 360 render COD:MW2 at 960 x 600. Now we can have displays grids up to 7680 x 3200. Jesus fucking christ.
[QUOTE=dtoporowski;17224553] sauce [url]http://blogs.amd.com/play/2009/09/09/directx-11-%E2%80%93-what-to-expect/[/url] [/QUOTE] That should be linked to [url]www.ragu.com[/url]. What you put there is not sauce.
[QUOTE=gerbils_alt;17234852]That should be linked to [url]www.ragu.com[/url]. What you put there is not sauce.[/QUOTE] :rimshot:
[QUOTE=Pandamobile;17233442]When's this console generation supposed to end? 2013? The computing power differences between PC's and consoles is more evident than ever... The PS3 and 360 render COD:MW2 at 960 x 600. Now we can have displays grids up to 7680 x 3200. Jesus fucking christ.[/QUOTE] It's always been that way, it's the powerful pipeline on the consoles that even let the graphical quality be somewhere close to the PC. Imagine if the PC had a unified pipeline :buddy:
Dx11 isn't like Dx10 which didn't provide such a difference from Dx9.
[QUOTE=NegaEgg;17227391]We'll need a new Crysis[/QUOTE] good thing crysis is going to be a trilogy, and the second (using cryengine 3) is on its way
What could they possibly do in cryengine 3?
[QUOTE=compwhizii;17235801]What could they possibly do in cryengine 3?[/QUOTE] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzszgV3noGw[/media]
[QUOTE=mblunk;17235829][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzszgV3noGw[/media][/QUOTE] I wish that wasn't so small so we could actually figure out how good it looks.
Pretty impressive, multi-platform is something I didn't think of that CE2 lacked.
[QUOTE=DOG-GY;17235938]I wish that wasn't so small so we could actually figure out how good it looks.[/QUOTE] [hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSlsOQsVxPU[/hd] [b]Edit:[/b] be sure to click the hd button
[QUOTE=mblunk;17235829][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzszgV3noGw[/media][/QUOTE] It's far worse than CryEngine 2. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WJG14uLA3k[/media] [hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WJG14uLA3k[/hd]
[QUOTE=mgear;17235973]It's far worse than CryEngine 2. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WJG14uLA3k[/media] [hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WJG14uLA3k[/hd][/QUOTE] broke my automerge [editline]08:19PM[/editline] also you can't compare a very early cut-down version of ce3 to ce2, crytek somewhere said that the console version would be something like medium settings on the pc version (so just imagine high and very high)
[QUOTE=mgear;17235973]It's far worse than CryEngine 2. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WJG14uLA3k[/media] [hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WJG14uLA3k[/hd][/QUOTE] Hey you posted my video :buddy: Thankfully the only stuff (besides those lighting demos) are consoles running CE3. Hence why it looks like balls compared to CE2 with settings maxed out. CE3 on PC will be a feast for the eyes :v:
[QUOTE=mgear;17235973]It's far worse than CryEngine 2. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WJG14uLA3k[/media] [hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WJG14uLA3k[/hd][/QUOTE] hey guys let's compare a pc engine to an optimized version of the engine put on the consoles caues there's like no difference right
[QUOTE=thisispain;17236019]hey guys let's compare a pc engine to an optimized version of the engine put on the consoles caues there's like no difference right[/QUOTE] :saddowns:
lol succeed did Crytek show off their new engine for the PC or is it just for consoles? (yes it is for pC, but is there also a PC version)
They just showed it off for consoles it would seem. Having multi-platform ability is a big step for it.
[QUOTE=dtoporowski;17236621](yes it is for pC, but is there also a PC version)[/QUOTE] wat
xbox 360 fanyboys (and ps3) are going to scream "ahaah lok u hav crysis and it lok same as ps3/xbawx hehhe". Oh god that will be horrible. Good thing you can say back "oh cool, we had this back in 07 on the PC" [editline]09:02PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Soldier32;17236806]wat[/QUOTE] a PC version @ E3 that was for show
[QUOTE=dtoporowski;17236835]xbox 360 fanyboys (and ps3) are going to scream "ahaah lok u hav crysis and it lok same as ps3/xbawx hehhe". Oh god that will be horrible. Good thing you can say back "oh cool, we had this back in 07 on the PC" [/QUOTE] do no post
psot edit: oh shit
-snip-
DX11 is not going to be some massive step in gaming graphics, just like DX10 was not a massive step. By the time Windows 7 is as adopted as Vista is now then there will be another DX out. It's a shame because with the long life of XP came a very well optimized DirectX 9 at the end, and I don't see this happening with 11 since MS is not going to let the smoke settle on 7 before they announce their next OS.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.