• DX11 What To Expect! (AMD)
    135 replies, posted
Integrated GMA --> GeForce 6200 --> GeForce 7600 --> GeForce 7600 x2 --> 8800 GTS 512 --> GTX 280 --> GTX 295 :smug:
Old (<9000, I don't remember the details) ATIs --> Geforce 6600GT --> Geforce 7950X2 (yeah I know, excessive and way too expensive) --> 8800GTX (the one I have now) --> ??? I'll either get a 5000-series or a 300-series, depending on which performs best (and if Nvidia releases it within reasonable time, otherwise I'll grab a 5000-series).
ATI 3D Rage Pro-> ATI xpress 200m(intergrated)-> ATI 4670
9200 SE > 9550 > x1650 > 8800GTS > 4870. Seem like a lot over the past couple of years.
Integrated > 4850 1gb I cried because i forget what it means to say "can i run this game" I can run all of them :D
Can't remember what my first 2 computers ran on but guessing. Integrated > Integrated > x1300 PRO > 4870 1GB
[QUOTE=Robbazking;17305296][img]http://www.sweclockers.com/imagebank/200909/Amd5000a_large001.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.sweclockers.com/imagebank/200909/Amd5000b_large001.jpg[/img] If this is true we got some serious power on our hands.[/QUOTE] Link to source? Like the actual article, if there is one.
its from chiphell, but ofc by AMD, which it could be marketing, but we all know these cards are fucking fast, so ehh, who cares if it is marketing
Integrated -> 7600GT -> 8800GT -> Guess whats next :P
ATI Radeon HD Forty Eight Seventy?
[QUOTE=Robbazking;17305296][img_thumb]http://www.sweclockers.com/imagebank/200909/Amd5000a_large001.jpg[/img_thumb] [img_thumb]http://www.sweclockers.com/imagebank/200909/Amd5000b_large001.jpg[/img_thumb] If this is true we got some serious power on our hands.[/QUOTE] Suddenly I'm no longer annoyed by the price.
Intel Integrated -> Radeon 9200 (256) -> Radeon 3850 -- s3 Savage 7mb in my Laptop -> GeForce 6500 (brothers old comp) -> 9400gt in my brothers MBP.
NVIDIA RIVA 128 -> ATI Radeon X..?? (i can't remember.. long while ago) -> NVIDIA 8800 GT -> NVIDIA 8800 ULTRA -> ATI 4870 -> NVIDIA GTX 260 -> NVIDIA GTX 275 ->..?
TNT2 - Radeon 9600 - x1600(?) - HD2600 xt - HD4870 Damn, I want proof in those charts
Holy balls the 5870 is fast.
I hate performance charts like those. They start at 80% so all above 100% makes it look really, really better. Fucking biased charts. I'll wait for some honest 3rd party benchies like from Anandtech.
[QUOTE=compwhizii;17235801]What could they possibly do in cryengine 3?[/QUOTE] [hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04dMyeMKHp4&hd=1[/hd]
Yes I've seen that already.
[QUOTE=compwhizii;17310453]Yes I've seen that already.[/QUOTE] Figured you would have. Wasn't gonna stop me from posting it though.
It's not very impressive. For DX11 Cryengine didn't really...step it up a notch. All seems the same. Unless someone can change my mind.
uhh ol dude you obv haven't seen the vids
I watched it. I saw how it was worst than the last. And note. I'm not hating on DX11 or any Graphics card. Just the Cryengine 3.
yet it apparently runs much better than the first, mebe thats a bad thing oh well
That video is showing CryEngine 3 with DX9 graphics. Of course it doesn't look impressive. Just wait until they release more media for Crysis 2
I went from MX440 > 9600 XT > 7800 GT CO SE > 4870 512mb > Hopefully a 5870 in the coming months.
[QUOTE=luishi5000;17233254]The only part I am really excited for is that 4xAA is now mandatory, and Luishi likes his anti-aliasing![/QUOTE] So what, if I'm lagging I can't drop a few levels of AA to gain a few FPS? How is this a good idea?
Integrated > FX 5200 > Radeon x1650 Fuck this shitty computer.
[QUOTE=Robbazking;17305296][img]http://www.sweclockers.com/imagebank/200909/Amd5000a_large001.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.sweclockers.com/imagebank/200909/Amd5000b_large001.jpg[/img] If this is true we got some serious power on our hands.[/QUOTE] These graphs are misleading. The percentiles start at 80. Still good nonetheless.
Since everyone else is doing it: 9200SE (256Mb) > X1600XT (256) > 8800GT(512) [Pretty much dead now] > GTX275??? Or 5870 depending on pricing.
&#9608;&#9608;&#9608;&#9472;&#9608;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9608;&#9472;&#9608;&#9608;&#9608;&#9472;&#9608;&#9608;&#9608;&#9472;&#9608;&#9608;&#9608; &#9608;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9608;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9608;&#9472;&#9608;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9608;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9608; &#9608;&#9608;&#9608;&#9472;&#9608;&#9472;&#9472;&#9608;&#9472;&#9472;&#9608;&#9472;&#9608;&#9608;&#9472;&#9472;&#9608;&#9608;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9608; &#9472;&#9472;&#9608;&#9472;&#9608;&#9472;&#9608;&#9472;&#9608;&#9472;&#9608;&#9472;&#9608;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9608;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9608; &#9608;&#9608;&#9608;&#9472;&#9608;&#9608;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9608;&#9608;&#9472;&#9608;&#9608;&#9608;&#9472;&#9608;&#9608;&#9608;&#9472;&#9472;&#9608; [highlight](User was banned for this post ("ASCII spam" - Monkeyjoe))[/highlight]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.