[QUOTE=Druchii;17321842]Since everyone else is doing it:
9200SE (256Mb) > X1600XT (256) > 8800GT(512) [Pretty much dead now] > GTX275??? Or 5870 depending on pricing.[/QUOTE]
How is the SE different from the normal 9200? Just a weaker clock? I do miss my 9200 though, it ran everything you tossed at it, as long as it was compatible with DX8. Hell, oblivion looks beautiful on it running oldblivion.
[QUOTE=mgear;17323173]How is the SE different from the normal 9200? Just a weaker clock? I do miss my 9200 though, it ran everything you tossed at it, as long as it was compatible with DX8. Hell, oblivion looks beautiful on it running oldblivion.[/QUOTE]
God knows, i liked to think "Special Edition", or rather :downs: Edition. Had nothing but colour problems with it.I think it had a faulty VGA connector or something.
I guess SE stands for [B]S[/B]econd [B]E[/B]dition.
[B]Edit:[/B]
Or special edition.
[QUOTE=Druchii;17323211]God knows, i liked to think "Special Edition", or rather :downs: Edition. Had nothing but colour problems with it.I think it had a faulty VGA connector or something.[/QUOTE]
It was a good card, could max HL2 easily (not res though).
I went from
Shit -> Shit -> Shit in the form of a GeForce 5200 -> shittier LAPTOP -> 4870 1GB
:smug:
I'm so glad I finally got a job, got the money, and built my own fucking computer.
I have no upgrades.
My computer sucks.
[QUOTE=DementNeo;17321318]So what, if I'm lagging I can't drop a few levels of AA to gain a few FPS? How is this a good idea?[/QUOTE]
It means support is mandatory on the card. And it will run faster. See; Assassin's Creed and DX10.1
[QUOTE=BmB;17341066]It means support is mandatory on the card. And it will run faster. See; Assassin's Creed and DX10.1[/QUOTE]
Everywhere I heard is that there will be minimal to no performance hit at 4xAA. This could be taken as good news or that the cards are programmed to process it but not display the change on screen, to appear to have no hit.
On my 4850 1gb I get better FPS with AA on and max resolution.
[QUOTE=Robbazking;17305296][img]http://www.sweclockers.com/imagebank/200909/Amd5000a_large001.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.sweclockers.com/imagebank/200909/Amd5000b_large001.jpg[/img]
If this is true we got some serious power on our hands.[/QUOTE]
these kind of graphics are so stupid. this doesn't even look accurate anyway.
[QUOTE=Mark Johnston;17321675]These graphs are misleading. The percentiles start at 80.
Still good nonetheless.[/QUOTE]
AMD love doing that. Still, that's a fucking awesome performance gain.
[QUOTE=Mark Johnston;17321675]These graphs are misleading. The percentiles start at 80.
Still good nonetheless.[/QUOTE]
[img]http://filesmelt.com/downloader/Amd5000a_large001.jpg[/img]
[img]http://filesmelt.com/downloader/Amd5000b_large001.jpg[/img]
Sorry for the horrible shops, you get the idea.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.