[QUOTE=Trekintosh;44664714]I think Plex Media Scanner is too small.[/QUOTE]
took overnight to chug through 2tb of movies and 1tb of tv shows :v:
[QUOTE=wingless;44664740]I think he means win8 bitching in general.[/QUOTE]
Bringing up either
A) "Windows 8 is shit. itz so bad lul"
B) "People who hate windows 8 never used it and r gay"
[QUOTE=Brt5470;44664931]Bringing up either
A) "Windows 8 is shit. itz so bad lul"
B) "People who hate windows 8 never used it and r gay"[/QUOTE]
Followed by 50 pages [del]debating[/del] of bitching over the merits of both.
I wish they'd just edit out the links in the virus posts instead of deleting the thread
I want to laugh at stupid people
[QUOTE=kaze4159;44665043]I wish they'd just edit out the links in the virus posts instead of deleting the thread
I want to laugh at stupid people[/QUOTE]
Yeah i hoped they did that too, that's the most fun. Postal DDT'd the thread first but then went and deleted it, did anything interesting happen in the thread while i was asleep?
[editline]28th April 2014[/editline]
Also ISP has an outage, tethered to my nexus 4 over usb right now, for some fucking reason facepunch is the only site that works, even ping doesnt work
I only saw Google's cached one, which ends after your second post
[QUOTE=Trekintosh;44661794]IE in W8 is the only browser that's really pleasant to use with a touchscreen.[/QUOTE]
Do you mean the Metro version, or the desktop one?
'Cause I think Metro Firefox is in Aurora already
[QUOTE=esalaka;44665076]Do you mean the Metro version, or the desktop one?
[/QUOTE]
Both work pretty much the same way, modern UI IE just uses screen space better and had a more touch friendly UI.
[QUOTE=esalaka;44665076]Do you mean the Metro version, or the desktop one?
'Cause I think Metro Firefox is in Aurora already[/QUOTE]
Metro Firefox is cancelled/discontinued and is no longer receiving support.
[QUOTE=Stents*;44665148]Metro Firefox is cancelled/discontinued and is no longer receiving support.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, because they had less than 1000 daily users.
Touchscreen Windows sure is a popular platform.
I buying a prebuilt microserver a good idea? The dual core Pentium/AMD ones are dirt cheap.
[QUOTE=Warship;44665653]I buying a prebuilt microserver a good idea? The dual core Pentium/AMD ones are dirt cheap.[/QUOTE]
Depends entirely which. If it's a G8 HP Proliant Microserver, hell fucking yes, those are awesome.
What about a Dell PowerEdge? Is it too edgy?
[QUOTE=nikomo;44665608]Yeah, because they had less than 1000 daily users.
Touchscreen Windows sure is a popular platform.[/QUOTE]
Modern IE is pretty good, just wish you could block ads.
[QUOTE=Warship;44665785]What about a Dell PowerEdge? Is it too edgy?[/QUOTE]
PowerEdge microservers [b]REQUIRE[/b] large (Well, compared to the microserver) expensive chassis. They're basically small blades.
[QUOTE=Skanic;44665822]Modern IE is pretty good, just wish you could block ads.[/QUOTE]
I would seriously consider using IE, if it ran on Linux and Android, was open source, and wasn't controlled by Microsoft.
I could see myself maybe using it then.
[QUOTE=nikomo;44665883]I would seriously consider using IE, if it ran on Linux and Android, was open source, and wasn't controlled by Microsoft.
I could see myself maybe using it then.[/QUOTE]
Isn't there this dude on here who is running IE on Linux?
True open source imo is Firefox. I don't like Chrome.
[QUOTE=nikomo;44665883]I would seriously consider using IE, if it ran on Linux and Android, was open source, and wasn't controlled by Microsoft.
I could see myself maybe using it then.[/QUOTE]
If Trident was opened, I guess I might use it, too.
Except that it still contains the godawful invalid interpretation of the CSS box model in the form of compatibility mode, doesn't it
[QUOTE=Skanic;44665903]Isn't there this dude on here who is running IE on Linux?
True open source imo is Firefox. I don't like Chrome.[/QUOTE]
Chromium is pretty much on the same level as Firefox when it comes to openness - Chromium doesn't package all the "botnet" user tracking stuff that Chrome does, and it doesn't contain the closed code that gets added into Chrome.
[QUOTE=Oicani Gonzales;44661897]UE4 demos finally out
[URL]http://www.mediafire.com/download/rb4iqf555iakxbt/Elemental.rar[/URL]
[URL]https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5qGbn3OCAd8WXViQkpUa2F6aEU/edit[/URL]
[t]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-BjYDveiRy2A/U11_Zj9UqlI/AAAAAAAAEJQ/ngQ25u-EAx8/s2880/Effects+2014-04-27+23-50-50-04.png[/t]
fucking global illum is amazing.
not even gonna bother dling it though, people with much better specs are reporting 30-40fps[/QUOTE]
They should have kept SVOGI. And Chromatic Aberation needs to fuck off.
[t]http://i2.minus.com/iFXfcIJL6NVRb.jpg[/t] [t]http://i1.minus.com/ibem8X6GSR5oXa.jpg[/t]
[t]http://i2.minus.com/i2O58TgiZBFnB.jpg[/t] [t]http://i7.minus.com/ibi5DPKrslrpO4.jpg[/t]
[QUOTE=nikomo;44666153]Chromium is pretty much on the same level as Firefox when it comes to openness - Chromium doesn't package all the "botnet" user tracking stuff that Chrome does, and it doesn't contain the closed code that gets added into Chrome.[/QUOTE]
Basically, google has outsourced the development of the browser to the community, then they tack on a bunch of propretiary stuff.
chromatic aberration needs to stay only on electric interference parts
[QUOTE=alien_guy;44666260]They should have kept SVOGI. And Chromatic Aberation needs to fuck off.[/QUOTE]
It was too slow to keep in, and frankly it's for the best. UE4 has shown to run extremely well so far, it's fantastic. Lionhead hacked in an enhanced version of CryEngine 3's LPV into it, which has been pushed to official UE4, which is a pretty fantastic substitute for the time being.
and chromic abberation really does need to go away (Well, toned down. Heavily.) in Epic made stuff.
[QUOTE=wingless;44666330]It was too slow to keep in, and frankly it's for the best. UE4 has shown to run extremely well so far, it's fantastic. Lionhead hacked in an enhanced version of CryEngine 3's LPV into it, which has been pushed to official UE4, which is a pretty fantastic substitute for the time being.
and chromic abberation really does need to go away (Well, toned down. Heavily.) in Epic made stuff.[/QUOTE]
Just because something is computationally expensive doesn't mean you have to rip it out. hardware advances.
They had it running on a single 680 last year.
[QUOTE=alien_guy;44666386]Just because something is computationally expensive doesn't mean you have to rip it out. hardware advances.
They had it running on a single 680 last year.[/QUOTE]
And it will probably come back later on. It's an evolving codebase...
[QUOTE=esalaka;44666267]Basically, google has outsourced the development of the browser to the community, then they tack on a bunch of propretiary stuff.[/QUOTE]
I'm pretty sure that a majority of Chromium developers work for Google, but I'm too lazy to search for statistics.
[img]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-gSHK6NkSdkc/U15mr15J12I/AAAAAAAAEBE/DRhzo72cw-c/s0/2014-04-29_00-33-19.png[/img]
Oh fuck I'm legally an adult
[QUOTE=Oicani Gonzales;44666644]chromatic aberration is actually a user setting from what i read, its just not exposed in the demos. you supposedly can turn it off from the console
[editline]28th April 2014[/editline]
im pretty sure that [B]even the demo with sli 780s[/B] (idk the name of the demo) didnt have svogi because of performance reasons
svogi is [I]really [/I]resource intensive[/QUOTE]
?
The old UE3 Samaritan, UE4 Elemental and Infiltrator all ran on a single 680.
Happy birthday Kaze
Happy birthday
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
