[QUOTE=Protocol7;44858718]It does a good job, y'know, matching, but it's the most unreadable thing ever.
[/QUOTE]
I'll agree with you on that, any complicated regex just looks like a clusterfuck of letters and symbols
[QUOTE=Protocol7;44858718]Yeah but see there's like this shit I wrote a long time ago
[code]//Not Equals
c.Filter.CustomFilterValue = "^(?!" + CustomFilterTextBox.Text + "$).*$";[/code]
How the hell am I expected to read "^(?!penis$).*$" and know that it evaluates to effectively "match everything that is not 'penis'?"
It does a good job, y'know, matching, but it's the most unreadable thing ever.
[editline]20th May 2014[/editline]
Although we're not using Regex for anything advanced. Just equals/not equals, contains/does not contain, begins with/ends with. So I guess it don't matter too much.[/QUOTE]
that regexp would only be useful for checking a single word, and if you're doing that why not just do word != filteredWord
[editline]20th May 2014[/editline]
get rid of the first $ if you want to check if it's in the text at all, right now it's checking if it starts at the beginning and ends at the end of the text, meaning that the .* are doing nothing
regex gets queried directly against database rows on a single value anyway. has to exist this way because there is an option to input custom regex - I just put that stuff in to make things easier
LINQ would be easier to read though. for example
[code]var list = new List<string>();
var shit = from listitem in list
where listitem != ""
select new {listitem};[/code]
don't need the curly braces. bad habit of mine. otherwise returns a list of strings where they aren't empty
[QUOTE=Shadaez;44858795]that regexp would only be useful for checking a single word, and if you're doing that why not just do word != filteredWord
[editline]20th May 2014[/editline]
get rid of the first $ if you want to check if it's in the text at all, right now it's checking if it starts at the beginning and ends at the end of the text, meaning that the .* are doing nothing[/QUOTE]
Because comparing Strings like that doesn't check the value but the pointer. #languages
[QUOTE=SEKCobra;44858826]Because comparing Strings like that doesn't check the value but the pointer. #languages[/QUOTE]
then whatever string compare function exists in their language, because there's surely one
[QUOTE=SEKCobra;44858826]Because comparing Strings like that doesn't check the value but the pointer. #languages[/QUOTE]
can you imagine the hell that would be raised if garry decided to implement hashtags for whatever reason
[QUOTE=lavacano;44859036]can you imagine the hell that would be raised if garry decided to implement hashtags for whatever reason[/QUOTE]
I only use them ironically #edgy
Officially becoming a film editor today as I'm taking over a small indie project after the original editor just kind of left. It's a premiere pro project, and thankfully they are really fucking organized. Only problem is the technique the editor used at times. She would amplify a section and give it reverb by...
[img]http://puu.sh/8TYbd.png[/img]
Making 6 fucking copies of it.
WUT IS AUDITION
[QUOTE=Skanic;44859341][video=youtube;Z3GmV20L4Fk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3GmV20L4Fk[/video][/QUOTE]
It does look nice, but I am still not fully convinced of it.
I just can't get used to a touchscreen for traditional desktop stuff.
(I have an Asus Zenbook with Touchscreen)
Also, I've never edited in premiere for realsies before and so far, it's neat, and extremely fast, but hard as balls for my mind to get it wrapped around.
But I'm editing 1080p24 Prores 422 and I'm also editing off a USB3 portable harddrive but able to scrub through everything edited so far with no noticeable framedrops. Premiere is so optimized for me.
I used Premiere only momentarily for my art class last year and it was the shit. I loved every moment of it. Easy to use, fast, and decent enough results.
Protip: I have no idea about anything video.
i was going to buy a 4k monitor but now i'll probably just sell my surface pro 2 and get the pro 3, i just need microsoft to hurry up and announce the pricing for all the different versions (it ranges from i3 to i7 and 64 gb to 512gb, starts at $799)
[t]http://www.microsoft.com/global/en-us/news/publishingimages/ImageGallery/Images/Products/SurfacePro3/SurfacePro3Primary_Web.jpg[/t]
[QUOTE=meppers;44859633]i was going to buy a 4k monitor but now i'll probably just sell my surface pro 2 and get the pro 3, i just need microsoft to hurry up and announce the pricing for all the different versions (it ranges from i3 to i7 and 64 gb to 512gb, starts at $799)
[t]http://www.microsoft.com/global/en-us/news/publishingimages/ImageGallery/Images/Products/SurfacePro3/SurfacePro3Primary_Web.jpg[/t][/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/1WUAm4E.png[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Brt5470;44859463]Also, I've never edited in premiere for realsies before and so far, it's neat, and extremely fast, but hard as balls for my mind to get it wrapped around.
But I'm editing 1080p24 Prores 422 and I'm also editing off a USB3 portable harddrive but able to scrub through everything edited so far with no noticeable framedrops. Premiere is so optimized for me.[/QUOTE]
you're dealing with prores so All-I frames, not IPB. Less stress on CPU in exchange for larger source footage files.
I was comparing to my lossless editing in vegas, while vegas with all lossless avi is crazy fast too, the premiere is snappy. Don't need to prerender anything like I was warned.
The aspect ratio on the Surface Pro 3 is my favorite thing. My t100 is cool and all but fuck 16:9 for tablets.
After the initial learning curve, lightworks is a fantastic video editor.
I'm annoyed at myself for not giving it a chance earlier.
[QUOTE=kaukassus;44859428]It does look nice, but I am still not fully convinced of it.
I just can't get used to a touchscreen for traditional desktop stuff.
(I have an Asus Zenbook with Touchscreen)[/QUOTE]
then get a mouse
[editline]20th May 2014[/editline]
that thing looks so perfect, i just wish the keyboard didn't have a touchpad
[QUOTE=Brt5470;44860071]I was comparing to my lossless editing in vegas, while vegas with all lossless avi is crazy fast too, the premiere is snappy. Don't need to prerender anything like I was warned.[/QUOTE]
Premiere pro handling ipb Canon HD video is so smooth right now, even on a 2012 macbook pro with i5. It used to be horrible but now it can handle it just fine and it's just so good. Now I can see myself editing with Vegas better if I had more ram in my desktop
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/9K3zyU1.png[/IMG]
This happens a little too often, should i be concerned?
[editline]20th May 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=Brt5470;44859280]Officially becoming a film editor today as I'm taking over a small indie project after the original editor just kind of left. It's a premiere pro project, and thankfully they are really fucking organized. Only problem is the technique the editor used at times. She would amplify a section and give it reverb by...
[img]http://puu.sh/8TYbd.png[/img]
Making 6 fucking copies of it.
WUT IS AUDITION[/QUOTE]
there's even a built in effect for reverb wtf
I've had more phones than probably everyone in this thread has had. I had a total of 9 in 2013, 8 in 2012, and so far in 2014 I've had 4.
I think ProSet Wireless on the N2200 on my laptop fucks it up.
I uninstalled it and had no drops to 2 bars at all.
I had some monstrosities come in today.
[t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5831868/hardware%20gore/Photo%2020-05-2014%2011%2048%2005.jpg[/t]
See anything wrong with this?
And this... thing.
[t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5831868/hardware%20gore/Photo%2020-05-2014%2016%2046%2044.jpg[/t]
[t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5831868/hardware%20gore/Photo%2020-05-2014%2017%2012%2051.jpg[/t]
Both cold cathodes are held on with wood screws and both tubes are broken, there is also an IR blaster under the logo.
[QUOTE='[EG] Pepper;44860906']I had some monstrosities come in today.
[t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5831868/hardware%20gore/Photo%2020-05-2014%2011%2048%2005.jpg[/t]
See anything wrong with this?
And this... thing.
[t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5831868/hardware%20gore/Photo%2020-05-2014%2016%2046%2044.jpg[/t]
[t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5831868/hardware%20gore/Photo%2020-05-2014%2017%2012%2051.jpg[/t]
Both cold cathodes are held on with wood screws and both tubes are broken, there is also an IR blaster under the logo.[/QUOTE]
Was it you?
[QUOTE=digigamer17;44861007]Was it you?[/QUOTE]
I just took photos of what i found, all of it is the customers doing.
Totally forgot my tablet was powered on for these last 7 days. It still has charge. 7 days, it's at 37% battery, when I left it last Tuesday it had about 60%.
That's pretty damn good, for a Windows tablet.
[QUOTE=digigamer17;44861007]Was it you?[/QUOTE]
If it was pepper they would be held on with hot glue.
[QUOTE=rhx123;44861067]If it was pepper they would be held on with hot glue.[/QUOTE]
and duct tape.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
