Computer illiterate people who think they know things V7 content: out of stock
5,000 replies, posted
[QUOTE=xXScoutXx;26556229][media]http://youtube.com/watch?v=mO8y1iCLhqU[/media]
:suicide:[/QUOTE]
nike shoes in the background....
oh yeah, he's a fag
NEW BALANCE FOR THE WIN
[editline]12th December 2010[/editline]
with the pc question, is this good for $2978
CPU: Intel i7 870
MOBO: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD7
RAM: OCZ Gold 1600MHz 4GB
VIDEO CARD: Gigabyte HD6850 1GB OC Crossfire
POWER: Corsair HX 850W
Optical: Samsung SH-B123A Blu-ray combo drive
Storage: western digital black 1TB+ OCZ vertex II 120gb
The case is a Coolermaster CM690 II
think that is good value for money and has enough grunt to run New games? (Minecraft for example lol)
[editline]12th December 2010[/editline]
with the pc question, is this good for $2978
CPU: Intel i7 870
MOBO: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD7
RAM: OCZ Gold 1600MHz 4GB
VIDEO CARD: Gigabyte HD6850 1GB OC Crossfire
POWER: Corsair HX 850W
Optical: Samsung SH-B123A Blu-ray combo drive
Storage: western digital black 1TB+ OCZ vertex II 120gb
The case is a Coolermaster CM690 II
think that is good value for money and has enough grunt to run New games? (Minecraft for example lol)
Overpriced. And get new Intel processors, they are beast
[QUOTE=That_Crazy_Gman;26642803]
think that is good value for money and has enough grunt to run New games? (Minecraft for example lol)[/QUOTE]
Yes it can run new games.
[QUOTE=Wnd;26643037]Overpriced. And get new Intel processors, they are beast[/QUOTE]
really? these are prices from ordering the parts direct from the company
The 6850 is on par with a 5850, (The number for the high end gaming cards has been going down for some reason.)
Look at the performance revieuws for the 6850.
Also: please just get a 1500$ computer, 3000$ is just stupid, escpecially since you seem to have no clue what you are doing and what is: 'good'
It's good but very overpriced. Also, go start your own damn thread in PC building.
I dunno if this is content, but:
Some time ago, a certain mac owner (mildly fanboi-ish) explained to me that even though his computer and mine had about the same specs his would outperform mine, because the mac OS natively utilises the system resources better and if i were to install a mac os i would receive a significant boost in performance. Since i didnt know if this is true or not i did not reply.
Is it true or content?
I somehow doubt you're ordering the hardware 'directly from the company', company being the manufacturer.
That PC isn't worth $3k, no PC is worth $3k, especially not worth it when Intel is about to release new processors that'll beat the living crap out of it for half the price.
[QUOTE=Banshee FrieNd;26641073]no, I seriously use Norton 1999. This is getting annoying.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1036962-Is-this-a-virus[/url]
:v:
The 6850 is closer to a 5770/5830 in terms of performance. 6870 is a bit better than a 5850.
[QUOTE=Tools;26643316]I somehow doubt you're ordering the hardware 'directly from the company', company being the manufacturer.
That PC isn't worth $3k, no PC is worth $3k, especially not worth it when Intel is about to release new processors that'll beat the living crap out of it for half the price.[/QUOTE]
everything is more expensive in australia when it comes to software
[QUOTE=That_Crazy_Gman;26642803]nike shoes in the background....
oh yeah, he's a fag
NEW BALANCE FOR THE WIN
[editline]12th December 2010[/editline]
with the pc question, is this good for $2978
CPU: Intel i7 870
MOBO: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD7
RAM: OCZ Gold 1600MHz 4GB
VIDEO CARD: Gigabyte HD6850 1GB OC Crossfire
POWER: Corsair HX 850W
Optical: Samsung SH-B123A Blu-ray combo drive
Storage: western digital black 1TB+ OCZ vertex II 120gb
The case is a Coolermaster CM690 II
think that is good value for money and has enough grunt to run New games? (Minecraft for example lol)[/QUOTE]
That is roughly worth $1000, disturbingly overpriced.
[editline]12th December 2010[/editline]
broke my automerge :(
[editline]12th December 2010[/editline]
broke my automerge :(
the $3000 also covers the 24 inch moniter, gaming keyboard/mouse and sound system
$1500 then.
the rig itself is about $2000
So they're just charging whatever the cost of the computer is for their service?
[QUOTE=That_Crazy_Gman;26643475]the $3000 also covers the 24 inch moniter, gaming keyboard/mouse and sound system[/QUOTE]
Still not worth it.
$200 worth of screen, $150 worth of keyboard and mouse.
I'm ordering the parts and building it at home
[QUOTE=Dr Nick;26643452]The 6850 is closer to a 5770/5830 in terms of performance. 6870 is a bit better than a 5850.[/QUOTE]
The 6870 is between the 5870 and 5850 from what I've seen, mostly similar to the 5870 in terms of performance.
[editline]12th December 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=That_Crazy_Gman;26643600]I'm ordering the parts and building it at home[/QUOTE]
Make your own thread goddammit.
[editline]12th December 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=That_Crazy_Gman;26643600]I'm ordering the parts and building it at home[/QUOTE]
Make your own thread goddammit.
First time experiencing slowpunch.
price also includes shipping ect
Looking at laptops on edbpriser.dk, and the mass ammount of laptops with insane ammounts of [U]terabytes[/U] for storage amazes me.
Is it really that hard to think twice before writing "640TB"?
[QUOTE=That_Crazy_Gman;26643645]price also includes shipping ect[/QUOTE]
I bought your mom's virginity for $3k. It also included shipping.
[QUOTE=GoDong-DK;26643602]The 6870 is between the 5870 and 5850 from what I've seen, mostly similar to the 5870 in terms of performance.[/quote]
That's exactly what I said.
[QUOTE=Dr Nick;26643666]That's exactly what I said.[/QUOTE]
Sorry, don't know how I misunderstood "a bit better than a 5850". I would still say it's more "a tad worse than the 5870" is a better description, though.
should I really make a seperate thread?
[editline]12th December 2010[/editline]
I might just end up with idiots that know nuttin telling me shit
[editline]12th December 2010[/editline]
I might just end up with idiots that know nuttin telling me shit
[QUOTE=That_Crazy_Gman;26644053]should I really make a seperate thread?
[editline]12th December 2010[/editline]
I might just end up with idiots that know nuttin telling me shit
[editline]12th December 2010[/editline]
I might just end up with idiots that know nuttin telling me shit[/QUOTE]
Yeah, you should defiently make your own thread.
[QUOTE=Surma;26643306]I dunno if this is content, but:
Some time ago, a certain mac owner (mildly fanboi-ish) explained to me that even though his computer and mine had about the same specs his would outperform mine, because the mac OS natively utilises the system resources better and if i were to install a mac os i would receive a significant boost in performance. Since i didnt know if this is true or not i did not reply.
Is it true or content?[/QUOTE]
Half-content. Macs use system resources more efficently than a Windows system (windows memory management is balls), therefore a Mac requires less RAM to run applications at a comparitive speed. but you can't install Mac OS on a PC without hacking, so there.
[QUOTE=That_Crazy_Gman;26643645]price also includes shipping ect[/QUOTE]
Make your own fucking thread.
[QUOTE=Surma;26643306]I dunno if this is content, but:
Some time ago, a certain mac owner (mildly fanboi-ish) explained to me that even though his computer and mine had about the same specs his would outperform mine, because the mac OS natively utilises the system resources better and if i were to install a mac os i would receive a significant boost in performance. Since i didnt know if this is true or not i did not reply.
Is it true or content?[/QUOTE]
Well, to support this. I've observed that anything but GPU intensive tasks run through Wine are done significantly faster than on native windows. This doesn't confirm anything since it's on both Linux and Mac OS and it's basically just an observation without the proof to back it up.
This is mostly related to install processes and other insignificant stuff so I can't see it meaning anything at all. one thing that IS certain is that the Mac OS GPU drivers are optimized like grinded skunk shit.
[quote]
GPU tasks[/quote]
[quote]wine[/quote]
[quote]significantly faster[/quote]
no
Mac OS doesn't utilises the resources better, but it being based on BSD makes it faster than windows for some tasks
[QUOTE=PiXeN;26645234]no
Mac OS doesn't utilises the resources better, but it being based on BSD makes it faster than windows for some tasks[/QUOTE]
But the average PC is way more powerful than the average mac anyway so....
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.