So guys
Reccomend me a good laptop for ~500$
No gaming use intended.
[QUOTE=Birdman101;38801905]So guys
Reccomend me a good laptop for ~500$
No gaming use intended.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834230599[/url]
or
[url]http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834246485[/url]
After playing AOE2 for like six hours with friends a couple days ago Dawn of War is SO MUCH BETTER we have to fucking play this insteeead
it's so much faster and has so much more character and oh man the fighting animations
for the emprah
DoW 1 or 2?
[editline]12th December 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=HolyCrapAWalrus;38797961]Holy shit Makol, that's a lot of posts. I wonder who has the most on the site now.[/QUOTE]
ggt, went into that thread with 8 games.. look at my games list now.
[QUOTE=Birdman101;38801905]So guys
Reccomend me a good laptop for ~500$
No gaming use intended.[/QUOTE]
The ThinkPad Edge E530 seems a worthy option what MTMod posted.
[QUOTE=Flubadoo;38801181]Honestly there isn't much you can complain about for Alienware other than its ridiculous price, overly glossy screen, and flashy aesthetics (if you dislike those).
Their build quality is quite good, better than most Sagers or MSI laptops, and the fan noise and temperatures are really quite good.
[/QUOTE]
while Alienware does have slightly better build quality than MSI's gaming laptops Sager's build quality is tons better. I have an Asus ROG laptop and it's build quality is somewhere between Alienware's and Sager's.
all three laptops sound like jet engines under load though
[QUOTE=Makol;38802337]DoW 1 or 2?
[editline]12th December 2012[/editline]
ggt brp, went into that thread with 8 games.. look at my games list now.[/QUOTE]
1, got it from the Humble Bundle.
[editline]12th December 2012[/editline]
thinkstation case appreciation post
it's so pretty
[t]http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/lenovo_thinkstation_s20_d20_1.jpg[/t]
Does anyone else share my hatred of HTML?
[QUOTE=alien_guy;38803108]Does anyone else share my hatred of HTML?[/QUOTE]
I hated both it and CSS with a passion when something i tried to do at 02:45 the night before hand in didn't work. Now we grudgingly get along
I love HTML and CSS and Javascript.
But I found a new thing to hate.
Android development, and its UI design.
HTML's syntax is just ugly and horrible, javascript has to talk to HTML so it absorbs some of its nastiness.
[QUOTE=SataniX;38799157]Anyone know what these are?
[t]http://puu.sh/1A1RQ[/t]
Got 4 of them.
store.steampowered.com/app/*that id*/ goes to the homepage.[/QUOTE]
Antarctica :v:
[QUOTE=Amiga OS;38803775]Are we talking about XHTML here or HTML5? Because HTML5 is really damn tidy, I love it.[/QUOTE]
Are you seriously saying SGML is superior to XML, and if not, what the hell [B]are[/B] you saying?
I mean, everyone should write their HTML as if it was XML [I]anyway[/I], I don't see how XHTML is less tidy than HTML5. Especially since you can server HTML5 as XHTML.
(I'm still really damn irritated that they killed XHTML 2, though - maybe some of the ideas were dumb but at least it was trying to separate semantics and syntax unlike HTML 5. The damn WHATWG spec even has a sidebar link relation type. HTML doesn't need to know sidebars even exist.)
[QUOTE=latin_geek;38801310]even though you can gay up the keyboard which is pretty awesome I guess
[IMG]http://cdn101.iofferphoto.com/img/item/156/567/579/U2XFboPCfcoOZS7.jpg[/IMG]
[editline]12th December 2012[/editline]
BUT MY AUTOMERGE WHY[/QUOTE]
Non-centered laptop keyboards just make me twitch. The colors are kind of ridiculous, but the offcenter board would be my primary complaint on that laptop.
[QUOTE=Zephyrs;38803830]Non-centered laptop keyboards just make me twitch.[/QUOTE]
...That is centered, though?
Do you mean the fact that the addition of the numpad offsets the main keyboard part?
Thinking of buying this
[url]http://www.inet.se/kundvagn/visa/2675627[/url]
I was gonna upgrade like a year ago but shit got in the way of that
(Not gonna bother with a build thread, I think this is pretty perfect)
[QUOTE=Amiga OS;38803775]Are we talking about XHTML here or HTML5? Because HTML5 is really damn tidy, I love it.[/QUOTE]
XHTML presumably, this ugly shit:
[CODE]<table border="1">
<tr>
<td>row 1, cell 1</td>
<td>row 1, cell 2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>row 2, cell 1</td>
<td>row 2, cell 2</td>
</tr>
</table> [/CODE]
[QUOTE=MTMod;38802116][url]http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834230599[/url]
or
[url]http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834246485[/url][/QUOTE]
What does this mean?
[IMG]http://i.imgbox.com/abywk890.png [/IMG]
I cant find out how to get this "1TB hard drive combo"
[QUOTE=Amiga OS;38804016]I think one of the main things that bother me in HTML is the lack of consistency with head elements.
you embed a javascript file with a <script type='text/javascript' src='js/dicks.js'></script>
However a stylesheet is embedded with a... link tag? and a href attribute?
Aren't they both the same thing really? shouldn't they both be uniform?
They are both extensions to pure layout markup after all. Be that styling or interactivity.[/QUOTE]
The weird thing is that link is apparently supposed to refer to related content - but then you also include stylesheets via link elements, even though there's the style tag that kinda feels like it should be usable in the manner of script (<style type= ... src= ... />)
[QUOTE=Amiga OS;38804093]Nah, ugly shit like this which dreamweaver loves to splurge out.
[html]<span bgcolor='#ff0000' color='#ffbb00' size='5' face='comic sans'>fgsfgsfgs</span>[/html][/QUOTE]
Wait, aren't those attributes for span deprecated in everything that's not HTML 4 anyway
[QUOTE=MTMod;38801481]So I was going through my Facebook albums and came across the video where we put 1lb of tannerite in a laptop. Did I post that here?[/QUOTE]
i don't think so
Fuck shit fuck I accidentally supplied a inferior part number somehow when I registered my EVGA card last year and now they're shipping me an inferior card for my RMA, tried ringing their german number but they've gone home PANIC STATIONS
[QUOTE=leach139;38804245]Fuck shit fuck I accidentally supplied a inferior part number somehow when I registered my EVGA card last year and now they're shipping me an inferior card for my RMA, tried ringing their german number but they've gone home PANIC STATIONS[/QUOTE]
Bitch slap them through the internet.
[QUOTE=Amiga OS;38804210]Not IBM branded, 0/10 would not appreciate.[/QUOTE]
Oh, I didn't notice.
[QUOTE=alien_guy;38804290]Bitch slap them through the internet.[/QUOTE]
shitty thing is it's kinda my fault as I didn't check the part number, don't think it asked me for the part number when I registered it though only the serial
[QUOTE=leach139;38804245]Fuck shit fuck I accidentally supplied a inferior part number somehow when I registered my EVGA card last year and now they're shipping me an inferior card for my RMA, tried ringing their german number but they've gone home PANIC STATIONS[/QUOTE]
Don't open it when it arrives and contact them about it, as long as the package remains unopened it's probably fixable.
[QUOTE=Zephyrs;38803830]Non-centered laptop keyboards just make me twitch. The colors are kind of ridiculous, but the offcenter board would be my primary complaint on that laptop.[/QUOTE]
Non-centered touchpads make me twitch.
AKA ALL THE FUCKING TOUCHPADS
[QUOTE=chipset;38804484]Don't open it when it arrives and contact them about it, as long as the package remains unopened it's probably fixable.[/QUOTE]
If I can't get in touch with them before monday (extremely unlikely) I'll just decline the package from the UPS man
[QUOTE=Ezhik;38804671]Non-centered touchpads make me twitch.
AKA ALL THE FUCKING TOUCHPADS[/QUOTE]
touchpads in general make me twitch
[QUOTE=lavacano;38804169]i don't think so[/QUOTE]
[video=youtube;Dq_37_XWfSQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dq_37_XWfSQ[/video]
That's the motherboard returning from orbit at 0:07. It took us 20 minutes to find it :v:
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.