[QUOTE=Yumyumbublegum;16807132]rage[/QUOTE]
agreement of rage
avatars with high five emote between
this reminds me of an old forum I used to frequent which had a thread devoted entirely to whatever this is and it was a stupid number of pages long
Settle down, I was only kidding.
Firefox 3.5.2 Beta is my main browser.
Although, I do have Chrome and Opera also.
[QUOTE=bobdole103;16807257]Settle down, I was only kidding.
Firefox 3.5.2 Beta is my main browser.
Although, I do have Chrome and Opera also.[/QUOTE]
3.5.2 isnt beta.
Lunascape / Firefox
Firefox is win and always will be for: Firebug and Web Dev. Toolbar!!!
Firefox/Chrome combo
Heavily customized and extensively modified Firefox:
[img]http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/2839/40142954.png[/img]
Alot of the mods I've done aren't visible since they are in about:config,
I've used the same installation since 2.0.11, when I first installed Vista.
[QUOTE=Robbazking;16762981][img]http://infosecurity.us/images/safari512px.png[/img][/QUOTE]
people actually use safari on windows?
why?
for that matter, why use it at all?
and in response to the thread, firefox and chrome, one on each monitor.
[QUOTE=limulus54;16809867]people actually use safari on windows?
why?
for that matter, why use it at all?
and in response to the thread, firefox and chrome, one on each monitor.[/QUOTE]
because safari is better than IE.
[QUOTE=BananasGoMoo;16809922]because safari is better than IE.[/QUOTE]
It doesn't mess up when loading malicious sites, it's one of the default browsers that says:
WARNING: SHIT SITE GONNA ATTACK.
Go back
Enter (not recommended)
[QUOTE=Unreliable;16809979]It doesn't mess up when loading malicious sites, it's one of the default browsers that says:
WARNING: SHIT SITE GONNA ATTACK.
Go back
Enter (not recommended)[/QUOTE]
almost every browser does that.
[QUOTE=BananasGoMoo;16809992]almost every browser does that.[/QUOTE]
I am smiling when i say that IE doesn't.
Where's that malicious sites thread.
[editline]1:51 AM[/editline] Found it!
[url]http://www.facepunch.com/showpost.php?p=16088452&postcount=18[/url]
[QUOTE=Unreliable;16810027]I am smiling when i say that IE doesn't.
Where's that malicious sites thread.[/QUOTE]
thats why i said almost. and why safari is better than IE (one of the reasons why)
[QUOTE=BananasGoMoo;16810058]thats why i said [b]almost[/b]. and why safari is better than IE (one of the reasons why)[/QUOTE]
it's almost 2:00 AM, sorry i didnt notice that word :smile:
[QUOTE=Unreliable;16810074]it's almost 2:00 AM, sorry i didnt notice that word :smile:[/QUOTE]
lol nice
[QUOTE=BananasGoMoo;16809922]because safari is better than IE.[/QUOTE]
what browser isn't better than IE?
[QUOTE=limulus54;16814641]what browser isn't better than IE?[/QUOTE]
:clint:
[QUOTE=limulus54;16814641]what browser isn't better than IE?[/QUOTE]
Netscape
I use chromium now, its the latest beta build for chrome, but nightly builds. I even made a simple updater that connects here: [url]http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-xp/LATEST[/url] then reads the page, and downloads the updater for it, installs it, all silently, then shuts down the app.
So if you don't understand, Chromium is the most recent browser for chrome.
[QUOTE=_Underlined_;16821454]I use chromium now, its the latest beta build for chrome, but nightly builds. I even made a simple updater that connects here: [url]http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-xp/LATEST[/url] then reads the page, and downloads the updater for it, installs it, all silently, then shuts down the app.
So if you don't understand, Chromium is the most recent browser for chrome.[/QUOTE]
See: More buggy
That link points to the latest trunk build, no matter what unit tests it fails. So there may be a time that somebody submits new code that breaks something else that they didn't catch. The best way to stay up to date is to get the dev channel builds, that way you know it's passed all the tests that the previous release has passed.
[QUOTE=Zeraxify;16761309]I use good ol' Google Chrome. Since yesterday, in fact, since my Firefox is all fucked up for some reason.[/QUOTE]
Yeah that happened to me too. So i downloaded Chrome and am actually loving it.
Same here.
* ‏*  ‏
[QUOTE=jivemasta;16821749]See: More buggy
That link points to the latest trunk build, no matter what unit tests it fails. So there may be a time that somebody submits new code that breaks something else that they didn't catch. The best way to stay up to date is to get the dev channel builds, that way you know it's passed all the tests that the previous release has passed.[/QUOTE]
I've used a heap of builds from there and i've never once had a problem or a bug (or a crash).
[QUOTE=jivemasta;16821749]See: More buggy
That link points to the latest trunk build, no matter what unit tests it fails. So there may be a time that somebody submits new code that breaks something else that they didn't catch. The best way to stay up to date is to get the dev channel builds, that way you know it's passed all the tests that the previous release has passed.[/QUOTE]no, no...just no.
It works much better, with tons of new features you yet to see even in Chrome dev builds. It's much better, I recommend it by far.
[QUOTE=_Underlined_;16826133]no, no...just no.
It works much better, with tons of new features you yet to see even in Chrome dev builds. It's much better, I recommend it by far.[/QUOTE]
I don't think you understand what I'm saying. Those releases are built by a bot whenever somebody checks code in. That means it could have errors that the programmer didn't catch. It has a higher potential of having bugs than the dev channel builds. I'm not saying it is plagued by bugs and not usable. The program is far enough that it won't work at all, but it could randomly not work for some stuff.
I used them for a while when I switched to linux because I couldn't find any other way to try out the linux builds, and some sites just wouldn't work. Or if I opened multiple tabs at once, about half would not get rendered. Once I found the dev channel .deb package, I went back a couple builds, but I've noticed a lot less of those problems. I know the linux builds are more apt to bugs than the windows ones, but the same thing could happen once someone tries to implement a bigger feature.
Also, I don't think there's any major new features that aren't in the current chrome builds. They have extensions, content scripts, themes, bookmark sync. The only thing the newest chromium builds might have is actual UI for those features.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
