[QUOTE=Odellus;29936691]there's nothing wrong with smoother media[/QUOTE]
Yeah but the way the TVs do it just looks very odd to me, and not what is intended to look like. If it was shot that way it would likely look different / better.
[QUOTE=Shadaez;29932167]He's saying that having 40FPS on a 120hz monitor doesn't look like 60FPS, which is very likely placebo.
And what are you even talking about, a better overview without clutter? we're talking about refresh rate which has nothing to do with that.[/QUOTE]
You have no idea what I'm talking about, no point arguing then.
[QUOTE=Odellus;29925107]television isn't broadcasted at 60 FPS, it's broadcasted at 24 FPS, and it's a 60 Hz television with "advanced" frame interpolation[/QUOTE]
Uh, television stations DO broadcast at 60 hz. At least ones using the NTSC standard. Its just that many shows and such are recorded at 24 FPS. The broadcast format doesn't change based on content.
[QUOTE=Demache;29946289]Uh, television stations DO broadcast at 60 hz. At least ones using the NTSC standard. Its just that many shows and such are recorded at 24 FPS. The broadcast format doesn't change based on content.[/QUOTE]
that's what I just said, meaning you could be running your TV at 24 Hz and it would look exactly the same
[editline]20th May 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Oblivion472;29944737]You have no idea what I'm talking about, no point arguing then.[/QUOTE]
no I'm pretty sure he replied exactly right to your idiotic statement that made no sense
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
