[QUOTE=Lyoko774;29046262]I don't see what people hate about Gnome 3. Yeah, it's a bit...different from the good 'ol Gnome panel, but it certainly feels more efficient to use, even on a proper desktop. (to me, anyway) I love how many of the default Gnome applications integrated into the Shell, it's a very nifty feature.[/QUOTE]
The problem I have with it is that they took gnome 2, removed everything that is configurable, then stuck a rather buggy gnome-shell on top.
KDE :P
[QUOTE=Ca5bah;29049821]LXDE :P[/QUOTE]
Fixed.
Openbox.
A working system running at 60mb, suck it.
I was criticizing Gnome3 for being so much of a hog like KDE.
Believe me, if I'm not running Awesome I'm running Openbox. My favourite DE's though are Lxde and Xfce :p.
I enabled the testing repository in arch. Over a gigabyte of updates.
Including 2.6.38 WONGA!
Currently running LXDE-spin of Fedora. Couple of questions.
[del]1> What's the equivalent of gconf-editor?[/del]
[del]2> How do I configure the menu buttons to be on the left[/del]
[del]3> I'm using [url=http://box-look.org/content/preview.php?preview=1&id=139258&file1=139258-1.png&file2=&file3=&name=ElegantBox+Theme+Pack]this theme[/url], how do I get the window border to look like that? It currently has a black border[/del]
4> Is there any way I can get globalmenu? :saddowns:
[b]Edit:[/b]
Solved three out of four of them. Can anyone help me with globalmenu?
Installed gnome 3, it's crashed 5 times already. Way to go.
I can't set my wallpaper properly, and none of my keybinds work.
[img]http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/9297/screenshotzot.png[/img]
Hurray! it doesn't work!
Atleast it doesn't look like [url=http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23989104/wtfdude.png]this[/url].
[QUOTE=WeltEnSTurm;29050846]Atleast it doesn't look like [url=http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23989104/wtfdude.png]this[/url].[/QUOTE]
Does the new GNOME come with the green terminal text?
[QUOTE=FPtje;29050465]Installed gnome 3, it's crashed 5 times already. Way to go.
I can't set my wallpaper properly, and none of my keybinds work.
[img_thumb]http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/9297/screenshotzot.png[/img_thumb]
Hurray! it doesn't work![/QUOTE]
Bad luck, I suppose. It works fine for me unless I let Nautilus manage the desktop..then it crashes everytime I plug in my phone. v:v:v
[QUOTE=faillord adam;28984437]Is it possible to use Skype in Emapthy?[/QUOTE]
Repost.
[QUOTE=faillord adam;29056708]Repost.[/QUOTE]
Yes. I found out that there is a Skype plugin for Empathy from every Linux user's best friend, [url=http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Skype+in+Empathy]Google[/url]. In the future, please search on your own before asking here. Forums are the fourth line of defense in problem-solving:
[list][*]First mess around with the program, clicking likely buttons/whatever.
[*]Search the manpages, package repo, or whatever locally on your computer.
[*]Then Google for a while to look for clues.
[*]Ask if even your best Google escapades fail you.
[*]If all else fails, try again after a break (recommended), learn to live with it until an update, or try using a temporary alternative.[/list]
Don't take this as me telling you not to post here. Feel free. This just stops simple problems like this from clogging up the forums. :smile:
Holy fuck e4rat really makes a difference to boot times. By inducing overall filesystem fragmentation (IE moving most used files to one area) I've dropped boot-to-desk times from about 40 seconds to ~20 seconds.
For Archers, it's in the AUR; follow [url]https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/E4rat[/url]
For everyone else, either check your repos or build from source at [url]http://e4rat.sourceforge.net/[/url] (debian packages available there too)
Is there a way to limit a user to only being able to have a single sshd session at a time?
[editline]9th April 2011[/editline]
seem to have done it by adding a user in limits.conf instead of using a group.
The more I use Arch the more I love it. You can find [i]ANYTHING[/i] in the AUR, but even the official repositories are quite large.
[QUOTE=Lyoko774;29059901]The more I use Arch the more I love it. You can find [i]ANYTHING[/i] in the AUR, but even the official repositories are quite large.[/QUOTE]
I even put alias pacman='yaourt' in my .bashrc, there's no point as using Arch's pacman as a normal user anyway since it doesn't do su/sudo checks.
[QUOTE=kukiric;29060039]I even put alias pacman='yaourt' in my .bashrc, there's no point as using Arch's pacman as a normal user anyway since it doesn't do su/sudo checks.[/QUOTE]
..that's a good idea. Imma steal it.
I just use Packer for the AUR.
[editline]8th April 2011[/editline]
Simple as "sudo packer -S "app""
[QUOTE=Ca5bah;29060363]I just use Packer for the AUR.
[editline]8th April 2011[/editline]
Simple as "sudo packer -S "app""[/QUOTE]
Same as every other AUR helper.
Is there really any real difference between yaourt, clyde, etc?
Does Arch Linux's xf86-video-vmware not support OpenGL or something? I tried installing GNOME 3 [i]and[/i] KDE4 in a VM following [url]https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Installing_Arch_Linux_in_VMware[/url] but both of them failed without graphics acceleration.
[editline]o[/editline] In separate VMs, of course (KDE4 and GNOME)
[QUOTE=Nipa;29061729]Does Arch Linux's xf86-video-vmware not support OpenGL or something? I tried installing GNOME 3 [i]and[/i] KDE4 in a VM following [url]https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Installing_Arch_Linux_in_VMware[/url] but both of them failed without graphics acceleration.
[editline]o[/editline] In separate VMs, of course (KDE4 and GNOME)[/QUOTE]
VM graphics acceleration sucks, or for some does not exist. Both of those will fail in many VMs.
If I use LXDM, is there any way to [b]completely[/b] remove all GNOME/KDE shit from Fedora?
Yes, I'm [i]that[/i] kind of person.
Honestly, just install openbox then any Lxde apps that you want.
[QUOTE=ASmellyOgre;29058065]Yes. I found out that there is a Skype plugin for Empathy from every Linux user's best friend, [url=http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Skype+in+Empathy]Google[/url]. In the future, please search on your own before asking here. Forums are the fourth line of defense in problem-solving:
[list][*]First mess around with the program, clicking likely buttons/whatever.
[*]Search the manpages, package repo, or whatever locally on your computer.
[*]Then Google for a while to look for clues.
[*]Ask if even your best Google escapades fail you.
[*]If all else fails, try again after a break (recommended), learn to live with it until an update, or try using a temporary alternative.[/list]
Don't take this as me telling you not to post here. Feel free. This just stops simple problems like this from clogging up the forums. :smile:[/QUOTE]
Google had nothing.
[QUOTE=faillord adam;29065598]Google had nothing.[/QUOTE]
[url=http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1453407]The first link has it.[/url]
FUCKING 403 ERROR
So i've got Debian Squeeze and Pure-ftpd setup on my server, made some shell scripts for adding users and stuff, but now i've come up with a problem. Basically the server requires a login from with a account, but i would like to make it so if no username/password are specified, (For instance the ftp is opened in a browser, possible?) it automatically get chrooted to a folder with read only acces.
[editline]10th April 2011[/editline]
Also, pure-ftpd gets started with /etc/init.d/pure-ftpd start, and i have no idea how to specify arguments to that. For the passive port range i had to use -P Port:Port, but making a file named PassivePortRange in the config folder with Port Port in it also worked, i basically need something like the -i parameter, which disallows uploading from anon account.
Check inside the init file.
fuck centos piece of shit, fedora is by far superior
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
