[QUOTE=Forumaster;17416032]Actually, there is a rather extensive list of games that use PhysX.
Copy-paste from Wikipedia:
* Age of Empires III (Only on the Mac version)
* Army of Two
* Auto Assault
* Batman: Arkham Asylum
* Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway
* City of Villains
* Cryostasis: Sleep of Reason
* Empire Earth III
* Frontlines: Fuel of War
* Gears of War
* Gears of War 2
* Race Driver: Grid
* Mass Effect
* Mirror's Edge
* Mobile Suit Gundam: Crossfire
* Monster Madness: Battle for Suburbia
* Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends
* Robert Ludlum's The Bourne Conspiracy
* Shadowgrounds: Survivor
* Trine
* Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Vegas (No GeForce PhysX)
* Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell: Double Agent
* Unreal Tournament 3
* Unreal Tournament 3: Extreme Physics Mod
* Valkyria Chronicles
[/QUOTE]
Now sort out the ones that are worth playing, then sort out the ones that actually feel different with physX.
[QUOTE=Forumaster;17416032]the Gamebryo Engine (used for Fallout 3, Elder Scrolls 4, Civ IV) have built in support for PhysX.[/QUOTE]
Nope, Gamebyro uses Havoc.
Arkham is the only game in that list I'd play.
[QUOTE=thisispain;17416616]Nope, [b]Gamebyro uses Havoc[/b].[/QUOTE]
Yes, but I saw a thread on the bethesda forums ( I think ) saying it had support for physX, something that would have kicked ass in Fallout 3.
[QUOTE=Robber;17416394]No, they had to make it Vista only because of the new driver model.[/QUOTE]
As Panda already corrected me about.
Why the fuck are they releasing DX11 already? There's only like 30 Games that use DX10, so why the fuck release another? And an earlier poster was right, by the time a game worth playing running DX11 actually comes out NVidia will have cards.
[QUOTE=Forumaster;17416032]Actually, there is a rather extensive list of games that use PhysX.
Copy-paste from Wikipedia:
*{List}
Also, the Unreal Engine (used for UT3, BioShock, etc.) and the Gamebryo Engine (used for Fallout 3, Elder Scrolls 4, Civ IV) have built in support for PhysX.[/QUOTE]
NFS Shift. (Unplayable to ATI users)
[editline]05:22PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=DaCommie1;17418333]Why the fuck are they releasing DX11 already? There's only like 30 Games that use DX10, so why the fuck release another? And an earlier poster was right, by the time a game worth playing running DX11 actually comes out NVidia will have cards.[/QUOTE]
DirectX Release Dates:
1.0 - September 30th, 1995
2.0a - June 5th, 1996
3.0 - September 15, 1996
3.0a - December, 1996
3.0b - December, 1996
5.0 - July 16th, 1997
5.2 - May 5th, 1998
6.0 (The one on Dreamcast) - August 7th, 1998
6.1 - February 3rd, 1999
6.1a - May 5th, 1999
7.0 - February 17th, 2000
7.0a - March 8th, 2000
7.1 - September 14th, 2000
8.0 - November 12, 2000
8.0a - February 5th, 2001
8.1 - October 25th, 2001
9.0 - December 18th, 2002
9.0a - March 26th, 2003
9.0b - August 13th, 2003
9.0c - August 4th, 2004
9.0Ex - November 30th, 2006
10.0 - November 30th, 2006
10.1 - February 4th, 2008
11 - July 22nd, 2009
I don't know, it seems to fit the general release space of all others, so why are you complaining about the release of DX11 only? Microsoft isn't just going to sit on their asses waiting for 4 million games to support it before they implement new technology. They have to keep going.
[QUOTE=BmB;17414540]They probably could update XP to be compatible, but if they are going to patch XP into being Vista whats the point? They need to sell these things sometimes too, despite their vast fortunes.[/QUOTE]
If you are saying they need to put DX 11 on XP, that isn't going to happen, they are trying to get people off XP.
[quote]It is clear Mr. Hara is pushing CUDA and compute shader performance over gaming performance.[/quote]
It doesn't matter if you get 1 fps, because it will look so good that you won't even notice!
[QUOTE=Second-gear-of-mgear;17421034]If you are saying they need to put DX 11 on XP, that isn't going to happen, they are trying to get people off XP.[/QUOTE]
Way to read. You can't have dx10 or dx11 on XP because of the new driver model.
PhysX the physics library =! PhysX the hardware acceleration.
Very few games use the latter, and mostly as glorified visual effects. Simply because you can't as a developer release a product that won't run for half your audience.
Maybe it will accelerate those games anyway, but what's the bloody point if all it does it eat shader performance because the game is designed to run on the CPU anyway? Ubiquotous standards like DirectCompute and OpenCL will make hardware physics much more sensible to use as an integral feature for a developer.
Everyone is arguing about plain stupidities. Nvidia used to rape now they are just re-branding, but their top cards are still the top. Also Nvidia makes graphics cards, they don't make gaming cards. Their are other people who use nvidia cards other than fucking dumb ass gamers who bitch in threads about Omg the other guy is better because he cares about games not hardware. Xrays, Ground simulations, Cat scans, the list goes on and on benefit, or at the moment have been tested and have been sped up much faster with the use of Nvidia cards. Ati just make beefy cards that run insanely hot that before now had horrible drivers and never used the card's full potential. What Nvidia is doing is expanding its business helping things that are actually important. Directx has not made shit changes since 9ex the only thing going for dx11 is compute shaders, and you never know if Nvidia might release later when it is viable and actually being used.
So until then you people are being stupid, Nvidia is helping medical, geological, oil, etc. industries and all you can think about is OMG MY FPS WONT BE HIGH! They sell powerful Gpu's they can keep up with the competitors so why are you complaining dx10 really hasn't made a killer difference and nothing is exclusive atm. most of the time you have to say use dx10 because default is dx9.
This is ubiased I have a 8800gt and an x300 they both Oc'ed like mad keep me happy though x300 is in media pc now.
[QUOTE=Bonzai11;17423046]Everyone is arguing about plain stupidities. Nvidia used to rape now they are just re-branding, but their top cards are still the top. Also Nvidia makes graphics cards, they don't make gaming cards. Their are other people who use nvidia cards other than fucking dumb ass gamers who bitch in threads about Omg the other guy is better because he cares about games not hardware. Xrays, Ground simulations, Cat scans, the list goes on and on benefit, or at the moment have been tested and have been sped up much faster with the use of Nvidia cards. Ati just make beefy cards that run insanely hot that before now had horrible drivers and never used the card's full potential. What Nvidia is doing is expanding its business helping things that are actually important. Directx has not made shit changes since 9ex the only thing going for dx11 is compute shaders, and you never know if Nvidia might release later when it is viable and actually being used.
So until then you people are being stupid, Nvidia is helping medical, geological, oil, etc. industries and all you can think about is OMG MY FPS WONT BE HIGH! They sell powerful Gpu's they can keep up with the competitors so why are you complaining dx10 really hasn't made a killer difference and nothing is exclusive atm. most of the time you have to say use dx10 because default is dx9.
This is ubiased I have a 8800gt and an x300 they both Oc'ed like mad keep me happy though x300 is in media pc now.[/QUOTE]
I'm confused, you're saying you're unbiased but clearly you're praising Nvidia and talking down to ATi's "beefy cards that run insanely hot".
Nvidia isn't the only GPU company that makes workstation cards. ATi's cards are used for "medical, geological, oil, etc." purposes too along with other companies. So stop trying to claim you're "unbiased" when you are clearly just another fanfuck.
[QUOTE=Panda X;17418362]NFS Shift. (Unplayable to ATI users)[/QUOTE]
Does it really not work on ATI cards? I was looking forward to see how Shift turned out too
[QUOTE=Dr Egg;17423267]Does it really not work on ATI cards? I was looking forward to see how Shift turned out too[/QUOTE]
Don't listen to him it works. It's not as optimized as the Nvidia cards are since there are lower performance on ATi cards on NFS Shift but most likely there will be a hotfix for this on CCC.
[QUOTE=Dr Egg;17423267]Does it really not work on ATI cards? I was looking forward to see how Shift turned out too[/QUOTE]
It works, but the performance is god awful. I read that the 9800GTX+ gets like 20/30 FPS more than the 4870X2.
Not to mention the handling is god awful, and steering is delayed as fuck. Exactly what a racing game needs is handling and responsiveness.
Graphics makes a game apparently. Fuck playing, as long as it looks nice...
[QUOTE=Dr Egg;17423267]Does it really not work on ATI cards? I was looking forward to see how Shift turned out too[/QUOTE]
When it works, it works fine. But the game randomly crashes 30 minutes in, and sometimes right when a race starts. I have a 3850, and I get a smooth FPS maxed, shadows on medium because it looks the same as high.
boo :saddowns:
This guy has an HD4890 and it seems to run smooth for the most part, but look at the delayed steering:
[hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1aSenXRUFI&hd=1[/hd]
Oh man that is quite bad. He seems to be coping with it well but for the most part. Also I bet Panda X can't get 8k posts.
[QUOTE=Dr Egg;17424130]Oh man that is quite bad. He seems to be coping with it well but for the most part. Also I bet Panda X can't get 8k posts.[/QUOTE]
You win your bet.
[QUOTE=Dr Egg;17424130]Oh man that is quite bad. He seems to be coping with it well but for the most part. Also I bet Panda X can't get 8k posts.[/QUOTE]
Reminds me of the guy who got perma'd a while back for posting a thread in GD to announce his 10,000th post. Before garry perma'd him, hezzy reset his posts to 0. Fucking hilarious, IMO.
[QUOTE=Panda x64;17424157]You win your bet.[/QUOTE]
hahahaha. Well played.
[QUOTE=Dr Egg;17424130]Oh man that is quite bad. He seems to be coping with it well but for the most part. Also I bet Panda X can't get 8k posts.[/QUOTE]
8k? poor
[QUOTE=Rusty100;17424766]8k? poor[/QUOTE]
Sorry I don't post almost 25 times a day.
:love:
[QUOTE=Panda x64;17424873]Sorry I don't post almost 25 times a day.
:love:[/QUOTE]
it fluctuates between a lot, a little and none.
[QUOTE=Panda X;17424010]This guy has an HD4890 and it seems to run smooth for the most part, but look at the delayed steering:
[hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1aSenXRUFI&hd=1[/hd][/QUOTE]
That guy sucks at driving... People say keyboards are far more challenging, yet I have only gone off the track once, and have only lost one out of 15 races so far.
[QUOTE=Second-gear-of-mgear;17425884]That guy sucks at driving... People say keyboards are far more challenging, yet I have only gone off the track once, and have only lost one out of 15 races so far.[/QUOTE]
Well you can see the steering is delayed, I've yet to try keyboard (I used Wireless X360 controller and Logitech Driving Force (the old one)), but seeing how it's unbearable in terms of FPS I won't be trying it anytime soon. In racing games I'm good with a keyboard, just not sure how well it is here.
[QUOTE=Panda x64;17428009]Well you can see the steering is delayed, I've yet to try keyboard (I used Wireless X360 controller and Logitech Driving Force (the old one)), but seeing how it's unbearable in terms of FPS I won't be trying it anytime soon. In racing games I'm good with a keyboard, just not sure how well it is here.[/QUOTE]
The game randomly started crashing for me, Every time I turn right.
[QUOTE=Second-gear-of-mgear;17428065]The game randomly started crashing for me, Every time I turn right.[/QUOTE]
Least you can still do NASCAR racing... Right?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.