CIPWTTKT&GC v0X12 (v18): Makol can't Computer Very Good - Hardware & Software

What? Have you not read the thread lately? We talked about the 4GB GTX 680s a few times already. [editline]7th April 2012[/editline] [url]http://www.computerandvideogames.com/342101/features/the-face-of-tomorrow-how-ps4-and-xbox-3s-visuals-will-change-gaming/?page=1[/url] This was amusing to read.

[QUOTE=Makol;35469388]What? Have you not read the thread lately? We talked about the 4GB GTX 680s a few times already. [editline]7th April 2012[/editline] [url]http://www.computerandvideogames.com/342101/features/the-face-of-tomorrow-how-ps4-and-xbox-3s-visuals-will-change-gaming/?page=1[/url] This was amusing to read.[/QUOTE] PCs will still conquer the best graphics ever, nothing at the moment will beat it.

This is horrible, it should be burnt. [url]https://twitter.com/#!/BURSTNET[/url]

[QUOTE=Dorkslayz;35469374]Dont think I've ever seen a 4GB Card before. Either that or im blind.[/QUOTE] Wasn't sapphire planning 6GB 7970's? Or do you just mean the 600's?

In case you don't read Slashdot, Stanford is doing a [url=http://cpudb.stanford.edu/]CPU DB.[/url] Too bad it's being /.'d to death right now.

I think new console generations will have an great effect on the quality of games we're going to get in the future on pc, since those developers that port games from console to pc won't have to work as hard to bring the game up to pc standards in terms of graphics, as the new hardware will be a LOT closer to what gaming PCs can do today.

Didn't they make claims like that before?

[QUOTE=reverno;35469689]Wasn't sapphire planning 6GB 7970's? Or do you just mean the 600's?[/QUOTE] Just the 600's.

Know what's funny? The current intel IGPs are more powerful than the console GPUs.

Too bad it's impossible to optimize games for pc to the level they optimize console games

I can play quite a few games on my Llano IGP with console quality graphics

[QUOTE=nikomo;35469707]In case you don't read Slashdot, Stanford is doing a [url=http://cpudb.stanford.edu/]CPU DB.[/url] Too bad it's being /.'d to death right now.[/QUOTE] This would've been pretty useful to gman.

[QUOTE=Protocol7;35470288]I can play quite a few games on my Llano IGP with [B]console quality graphics[/B][/QUOTE] aka everything at 800x600

[QUOTE=Warship;35470397]aka everything at 800x600[/QUOTE] And upscaled to 1080p

[QUOTE=Warship;35470397]aka everything at 800x600[/QUOTE] Ever played Super Meat Boy at 400x200 on integrated graphics 5 FPS all over the place :v:

Why are so many indie titles so unoptimized?

My fucking god I hate IE6, still the fallback is working rather well, I have had to disable the alternate theme, though. I love how one icon is still freaking out due to no alpha channel on PNG files. [t]http://puu.sh/ooj9[/t] [t]http://puu.sh/ooiY[/t] [editline]7th April 2012[/editline] I don't understand why companies keep that crap installed on their employees computers.

[QUOTE=MC3craze;35470711]Why are so many indie titles so unoptimized?[/QUOTE] most I play are better optimized than AAA titles

Opening a Gameboy game in an emulator, picking a memory region and setting everything to F: Extremely immature Extremely amusing.

[QUOTE=Warship;35470397]aka everything at 800x600[/QUOTE] Lowest resolution I've ever seen a console game run in is Call of Duty: Black ops, which runs in 960 x 544. :eng101: Though it has 2x AA, and also runs in 60FPS from what I gather. [editline]o[/editline] No wait, Ghostbusters for the PS3 runs in 960 x 540 which is a tiny bit smaller. [editline]o[/editline] Ok nevermind, Black Ops is still the king of low resolutions. A patch for the Ghostbusters game made it run in 1024x576 with 2xAA

At least the framerate is good.

[QUOTE=nikomo;35470827]Opening a Gameboy game in an emulator, picking a memory region and setting everything to F: Extremely immature Extremely amusing.[/QUOTE] I did that once (changing some letters in the memory viewer) in Sonic Advance 3 ... I ended up flipping all the sprites upside down somehow. I could never get it to do it again.

[QUOTE=MC3craze;35471091]At least the framerate is good.[/QUOTE] All the CoDs run at 60fps afaik. They even made it a "feature" when comparing MW3 to BF3 with runs at 30fps.

[QUOTE=SuperDuperScoot;35471106]I did that once (changing some letters in the memory viewer) in Sonic Advance 3 ... I ended up flipping all the sprites upside down somehow. I could never get it to do it again.[/QUOTE] Turns out, the attack stat values in Pokemon Red are signed ints. My attack rolled over into negative and I was hitting my rival for like 3 damage per Tackle.

[QUOTE=MC3craze;35470711]Why are so many indie titles so unoptimized?[/QUOTE] Could be lack of time/resources/knowledge

[QUOTE=Shadaez;35470800]most I play are better optimized than AAA titles[/QUOTE] On my old PC, I had a 6150se and I could run Doom 3 and CS:S better than I could Super Meat Boy.

finally got my BF3 key into a US english key wee

[QUOTE=nikomo;35471148]Turns out, the attack stat values in Pokemon Red are signed ints. My attack rolled over into negative and I was hitting my rival for like 3 damage per Tackle.[/QUOTE] For more old pokemon game fuckery look up the Mew Trick.

[QUOTE=Protocol7;35471487]finally got my BF3 key into a US english key wee[/QUOTE] I thought i might be able to steal back Best Support and Top IFV Driver when you had it in Russian Well shit

[QUOTE=Protocol7;35471487]finally got my BF3 key into a US english key wee[/QUOTE] Gratz. Where did you get yours? Intkeys?