CIPWTTKT&GC v0X12 (v18): Makol can't Computer Very Good - Hardware & Software

[QUOTE=Strikebango;35688304]Has anyone seen her? [video=youtube;rGK-QO8yf6Y]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGK-QO8yf6Y&feature=channel&list=UL[/video][/QUOTE] [video=youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agXhBh74n2c&context=C401e3f4ADvjVQa1PpcFNNHnNNuG-1XTHX9d9G8RpMbecElePEAHI=[/video] i prefer this one [editline]23rd April 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Brt5470;35688463]Speak the fuck up. Jesus christ.[/QUOTE] her massive tits are in the way of the mic

I can't watch the video cause my hair is wet and I don't want to hurt my headphones, but is she good at computer or content?

[QUOTE=Brt5470;35688463]Speak the fuck up. Jesus christ.[/QUOTE] She sounds nervous, though. I think it's sincere. Isn't an excuse in the end though. She's got a soothing voice, and the review overall wasn't bad as such. Overcome the nervousness, don't ask for subscribers in that manner, and maybe test the fans at both their max [I]and[/I] at a speed where they push the same airflow, and it'll be great.

[QUOTE=Chubbs;35688808]I can't watch the video cause my hair is wet and I don't want to hurt my headphones, but is she good at computer or content?[/QUOTE] Good at computer, but has a soft voice.

[QUOTE=Chubbs;35688808]I can't watch the video cause my hair is wet and I don't want to hurt my headphones, but is she good at computer or content?[/QUOTE] Seems like she's got the brain in the right place, at least.

I think she could be good. She said she got two other members to do written reviews when she sets up a website, and she'll handle the videos. She compared it to TimeToLive having six members, but only Tom doing videos

Shes said that a new mic is on the way.

On a different note, the first reviews for Ivy bridge seems like it is what is was made out to be - and ncremental update. 10-20% (more in some cases, but generally around this) increase in CPU performance, lower power draw, and probably better overclockability. Could change when more reviews come out, though.

[QUOTE=GoDong-DK;35688934]On a different note, the first reviews for Ivy bridge seems like it is what is was made out to be - and ncremental update. 10-20% (more in some cases, but generally around this) increase in CPU performance, lower power draw, and[B] probably better overclockability[/B]. Could change when more reviews come out, though.[/QUOTE] Not from what I've seen. It's actually been running hotter than SB and using more power when overclocked.

I wish her channel well. As said before, she knows what she's talking about for the most part and just needs to overcome her nervousness and speak up. And you know, having good assets does help her get people's attention in the long run but then you get the people from NCIXEsther being weird/creepy. And I saw she did/does something for Overclock UK?

Looks like Garry's on a thread banning spree. Just giving you warning, you guys should probably whip up a new OP just incase.

[QUOTE=Protocol7;35688142]Just pointing it out It annoys me most when he gets on a platform high horse and dismisses iOS and other platforms without listening to reason[/QUOTE] Mmmm, nope. I'll take any platform [B]BUT[/B] iOS. WP7 - fine, Android - fine, Maemo - fine, QNX - fine, Symbian - eh pushing it slightly. I'd even run System 9 and below if I had the hardware to.

[QUOTE=elevate;35689052]Looks like Garry's on a thread banning spree. Just giving you warning, you guys should probably whip up a new OP just incase.[/QUOTE] Shit who had the next OP?

-snip-

[QUOTE=inconspicious;35689237]Mmmm, nope. I'll take any platform [B]BUT[/B] iOS. WP7 - fine, Android - fine, Maemo - fine, QNX - fine, Symbian - eh pushing it slightly.[/QUOTE] Symbian phones have incredible batterly life if you don't use them too much from what I've seen. On the other hand, usage kills them pretty easily.

[QUOTE=esalaka;35689286]Symbian phones have incredible batterly life if you don't use them too much from what I've seen. On the other hand, usage kills them pretty easily.[/QUOTE] I just found Symbian devices a little cryptic to use, and it didn't lag, it was just slow.

[QUOTE=esalaka;35689286]Symbian phones have incredible batterly life if you don't use them too much from what I've seen. On the other hand, usage kills them pretty easily.[/QUOTE] Sort of interesting how they can lost so long. My Symbian phone lasts about 3-4 weeks in standby (disconnected from the network obviously) after 3 years.

[QUOTE=Dr. Deeps;35689242]Shit who had the next OP?[/QUOTE] since no one answered i think it should be you

Alright, I'll do the next OP failing no one remembers who claimed it.

[QUOTE=inconspicious;35689237]Mmmm, nope. I'll take any platform [B]BUT[/B] iOS. WP7 - fine, Android - fine, Maemo - fine, QNX - fine, Symbian - eh pushing it slightly. I'd even run System 9 and below if I had the hardware to.[/QUOTE] iOS is fine, quit being an entitled baby

I think i claimed it back in feburary i can't be arsed though so deeps can do it.

[QUOTE=Protocol7;35689582]iOS is fine, quit being an entitled baby[/QUOTE] The ui is revolting, the legacy support is wrong. If anything they shuould be removing behind the scenes functionality on older devices like wp7 does. It doesnt have anything comparable to the intents system on Android which allows applications to seamlessly integrate with one another. The file system is intentionaly obfuscated from the user although it can be exposed with a bit of fiddling. Updates slow the device down instead of the reverse on many other platforms. And its just plain old.

[QUOTE=inconspicious;35689656]The ui is revolting, the legacy support is wrong. If anything they shuould be removing behind the scenes functionality on older devices like wp7 does. It doesnt have anything comparable to the intents system on Android which allows applications to seamlessly integrate with one another. The file system is intentionaly obfuscated from the user although it can be exposed with a bit of fiddling. Updates slow the device down instead of the reverse on many other platforms. And its just plain old.[/QUOTE] 1. Opinion 2. why? 3. Not really needed, more of a want thing. 4. Opinion issue on this. Regular users don't need to see the filesystem. 5. Happens on Android too. 6. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IOS[/url] 2007. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_(operating_system)[/url] 2007. And the company that started it was bought in 2005.

[QUOTE=inconspicious;35689656]The ui is revolting,[/quote] right because people can't have opinions, it's just straight up revolting objectively [QUOTE=inconspicious;35689656]the legacy support is wrong.[/quote] Android doesn't really support legacy devices either, it has to be modded to run well. [QUOTE=inconspicious;35689656]If anything they shuould be removing behind the scenes functionality on older devices like wp7 does.[/quote] You know, as iOS has gotten older the biggest drawback for "legacy" devices has been not being able to install newer apps. Core functionality remains the same, sans Retina Display/Siri. [QUOTE=inconspicious;35689656]It doesnt have anything comparable to the intents system on Android which allows applications to seamlessly integrate with one another.[/quote] Does everyone need this? [QUOTE=inconspicious;35689656]The file system is intentionaly obfuscated from the user although it can be exposed with a bit of fiddling.[/quote] Does everyone need this? [QUOTE=inconspicious;35689656]Updates slow the device down instead of the reverse on many other platforms.[/quote] On the newest devices performance is no worse than other platforms. [QUOTE=inconspicious;35689656]And its just plain old.[/QUOTE] This isn't a valid anything.

And I mean, honestly, this doesn't look all that bad to me... [t]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17065151/2012-04-21%2020.38.10.png[/t]

Oh, and that's not what obfuscated means. Obfuscated is like "Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?" The real sentence is "Has any video game company really taken such measure to make a game so realistic?" [editline]damn you deeps[/editline] My merge

[QUOTE=Dr. Deeps;35689726]1. Opinion [I]true, but its starting to look like windows XP to me[/I] 2. why? [I]Because you would want a device which functions the same as the latest model rather than being crippled[/I] 3. Not really needed, more of a want thing. [I]tighter integration between services is always a good thing[/I] 4. Opinion issue on this. Regular users don't need to see the filesystem. [I]Sometimes you have to when iTunes dies on you, or when safari refuses to download a certain file[/I] 5. Happens on Android too. [I]Typicaly it speeds the device up during the first few updates, iOS turns to shit from update 1[/I] 6. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IOS[/url] 2007. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_(operating_system)[/url] 2007. And the company that started it was bought in 2005. [I]The difference being Android has had several major overhauls over the years improving it significantly, beyond the initial introduction off app store apps on iOS not much has changed fundamentally.[/I][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Protocol7;35689777]Oh, and that's not what obfuscated means. Obfuscated is like "Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?" The real sentence is "Has any video game company really taken such measure to make a game so realistic?" [editline]damn you deeps[/editline] My merge[/QUOTE] [img]http://puu.sh/r9l0[/img] By hiding the filesystem behind everything with no way to see it, they are rendering it unclear, thus the usage of obfuscation or any other form of it is valid.

[QUOTE=Dr. Deeps;35689804]By hiding the filesystem behind everything with no way to see it, they are rendering it unclear, thus the usage of obfuscation or any other form of it is valid.[/QUOTE] In software development obfuscate is to write unreadable code as to make it hard to understand, not exposing the filesystem carries a different meaning. At least, that's the case around here.

[QUOTE=inconspicious;35689792]derpimgonnareplyinsideaquote[/QUOTE] 1. Again, opinion. 2. My 4 runs as fast as my best friends 4S. It's the reason she got the 4S 3. Everything seems pretty tight to me. 4. Safari can't download anything besides .pdf's and jpgs. anyways. Why would you need to download something on a mobile device. 5. Not true, my device is still fine on 5.0.1 and my mothers phone is fast on 5.1 6. Because the base system works so well. The feel of it is awesome, they don't need to have major overhauls every year. The minute tweaks to the system that they've done have been fine in making it better.