[img]http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff136/fcfordlord/tempsror10.jpg[/img]
temps after playing Rigs Of Rods (physics simulator that can bring ANY computer to its knees) for 10 mins or so.
I don't know why people say not to use SpeedFan. Thats what I usually use and its temps were the exact same as HWMonitor
OH I forgot to say, processor is overclocked from 2.8GHz to 3.4 GHz
and why was I rated dumb?
[IMG]http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/2464/tempscrysisdragonage.png[/IMG]
just played some Crysis and Dragon Age
ill post mine, just after some MW2, although my graphics card fans are set to auto..
[img]http://filesmelt.com/dl/Capture86.JPG[/img]
With a dying fan but havent been doing anything major except talking to people on myspace/facebook and browsing Facepunch
arent my GPU temps really hot? i held my hand up to it and it was burning hot
[img]http://i.imagehost.org/0177/temps.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Yumyumbublegum;19300442][img]http://yumyumbublegum.mine.nu/pics/temps2.png[/img][/QUOTE]
HD 5000 serie has some impressive temps!
[IMG]http://i45.tinypic.com/4v4itc.png[/IMG]
go me
[img]http://i48.tinypic.com/nzltad.png[/img]
Temps from this morning. Compared to the ones I posted last night these are an improvement. It was pretty hot too. Now it's just normal up here.
I should get my mineral-oil PC up and running again and put something intensive on it, I can get that sunnavabitch to 16C under load with an easy trick. (submerge the radiator in ice water :downs:)
[img]http://www.abload.de/img/temps251d.jpg[/img]
[IMG]http://www.filez.muffinz.eu/download/cpuheat.png[/IMG]
A little bit hot under load. :ohdear:
[QUOTE=whatnow V2;19577634]uh, look, his 3200+ went to 114c.[/QUOTE]
Didn't even watch above post.
Relied on that my laptop was hotter.
explain?
i don't understand your :downs: logic
I'm liking my new AC7.
[img]http://filesmelt.com/dl/temps_1-6-10_to_1-11-10.PNG[/img]
1st set of temps is with the stock cooler at stock speed, second set is with the AC7 and OCed to 3.8 GHz. Min is idle, max is load (L4D2).
stock cooler @ 3.8? pretty good, but have you ran any stress testing?
[QUOTE=whatnow V2;19581361]stock cooler @ 3.8? pretty good, but have you ran any stress testing?[/QUOTE]
AC7 @ 3.8, and yeah I've run LinX a few times and about 4 hours of Prime95. I'm going to do more extensive testing this week.
[editline]06:17PM[/editline]
Prime95 brings it up to ~70C and LinX ~80C :derp:
Ones from Speedfan. Hardware Monitor can't see my CPU temps for some weird reason. Also I think the ambient sensor is broken.
[img]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll87/Demache/cputempcpqpresio.png[/img]
39* Idle. Haven't gotten around to testing under load because I plan to overclock some more soon.
BTW: Intel i7 920 clocked to 2.8 instead of 2.66.
Any way I can control my CPU fanspeed?
My laptop likes to shutdown to prevent damage.
I'm using it on a table, and have already put stuff on its back corners, so there should still be some space to breath.
[IMG]http://i46.tinypic.com/1so3mo.png[/IMG]
So I took off my CPU heatsink. It was THICK with compound.
Put on a little bit, smeared it all about, and put it back on. Good 5 C improvement.
[code]
Sensor
Sensor Properties:
Sensor Type Winbond W83627DHG (ISA 290h)
GPU Sensor Type Analog Devices ADT7473, Volterra VT1165 (ATI-I2C 2Eh, 70h, 70h)
Motherboard Name Asus P5E3 Deluxe / Premium
Chassis Intrusion Detected No
Temperatures:
Motherboard 36 °C (97 °F)
CPU 30 °C (86 °F)
CPU #1 / Core #1 30 °C (86 °F)
CPU #1 / Core #2 33 °C (91 °F)
CPU #1 / Core #3 42 °C (108 °F)
CPU #1 / Core #4 39 °C (102 °F)
GPU1: GPU 57 °C (135 °F)
GPU1: GPU Diode (DispIO) 54 °C (129 °F)
GPU1: GPU Diode (MemIO) 54 °C (129 °F)
GPU1: GPU Diode (Shader) 58 °C (136 °F)
GPU1: GPU Memory 52 °C (126 °F)
GPU1: GPU Ambient 54 °C (129 °F)
GPU1: GPU VRM 57 °C (135 °F)
GPU2: GPU Diode (DispIO) 50 °C (122 °F)
GPU2: GPU Diode (MemIO) 63 °C (145 °F)
GPU2: GPU Diode (Shader) 51 °C (124 °F)
GPU2: GPU VRM 50 °C (122 °F)
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 31 °C (88 °F)
Maxtor 6Y080M0 27 °C (81 °F)
Seagate ST3160023AS 24 °C (75 °F)
Cooling Fans:
GPU1 3220 RPM (44%)
Voltage Values:
CPU Core 1.30 V
+3.3 V 3.26 V
+5 V 5.11 V
+12 V 12.15 V
+5 V Standby 4.95 V
GPU1: GPU Vcc 3.30 V
GPU1: GPU Memory 1.58 V
GPU1: GPU VRM 1.06 V
GPU2: GPU VRM 1.26 V
Current Values:
CPU 29.25 A
GPU1: GPU VRM 12.19 A
GPU2: GPU VRM 25.74 A
Power Values:
CPU 34.85 W
Debug Info F FF FF FF FF FF
Debug Info T 36 30 251
Debug Info V A3 D9 CC CC CF D5 CF (03)
Debug Info I C1 A023
[/code]
[QUOTE=FordLord;19546116]
I don't know why people say not to use SpeedFan. Thats what I usually use and its temps were the exact same as HWMonitor
and why was I rated dumb?[/QUOTE]
this post on OCN could help you understand a bit.
[QUOTE=opt33]All programs refresh differently, all will read differently at different times, but mathematically not possible for hwm to just be refreshing at different times and have 3-4C higher temps at steady state idle, and 3-4C lower temps at 100% steady state coredamage load, especially looking at max and min temps over times, where realtemp and coretemp will usually have all 4 or 3 of 4 same min/max, whereas all 4 of HWM are 3-4C lower at load.
Interestingly, when disable ACPI/smbus in ini file, though it screws up idle more, the load temps now report exactly same as coretemp and realtemp.
EDIT: as an aside, regarding the 10C difference between heatspreader and core on first page...
The gradient is very similar on most cpus at idle, because almost all cpus idle between 3-8W. And variance from cpu to cpu is irrelevant at idle, because typical 15-20% difference in leakage at idle, is still 1W, ie less than 1C difference. So if you want to say most cpus at stock idle have a gradient of 7-8C from heatspreader to core, that would be reasonably accurate. (it is about 5C if undervolted to max, regardless of cpu variance, since variance at idle is less than 1C).
But at load, my E8400 with known tjmax 100C per intel, with hole drilled through heatsink and then into IHS per intel specs and calibrated thermocouple inserted into IHS, at around ~45W with orthos, gradient from core to IHS was ~15C. Near 60W with linx, gradient from core to IHS was 20C. Here is video, showing first the ~7-8C gradient at stock idle, vs 20-24C gradient at linx load from core temp using tjmax 100C (known for E8400) vs calibrated thermocouple in IHS (accurate to within +/- 0.1C per factory calibration of surface temp).
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7ua2FFByfI[/media]
This same variable gradient from heatspreader to core has been shown at stanford with help from intel, on pentium processor, though gradient on this chip varied between 15C to 30C from core to heatspreader dependent on loading program and TDP, and was about 5C at idle.
1st black line (from bottom) is ambient
2nd black line is IHS (thermocouple)
3rd black line is cpu temp diode sensor
then multipe grey core temps in various locations of core, here all are reported though vs coretemp/realtemp only reporting after filter, ie hottest.
Low tdp load programs like art, roughly only 5-6C between IHS and cpu temp and another 5-6C from cpu diode to core temps, ie max 10-12C from IHS to core.
High tdp load program like gzip, there is almost 30C gradient from IHS to core.
[IMG_thumb]http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/175/ihscoretemps.jpg[/IMG_thumb][/QUOTE]
39 degrees idle.
Sometimes the fan forgets to spin and it gets to about 75 :ohdear:
[QUOTE=Dr Egg;19352184]That strikes me as being quite an old processor for such a modern graphics card.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I plan on upgrading the motherboard and CPU when I can afford it. At the time I could only afford the GPU, so I thought I'd go with a high-end one so that it's not completely useless by the time I can afford to replace everything else. :downs:
I think I win.
[img]http://files.rewindstudios.com/Screencaps/Quadcore-Temps.png[/img]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
