• CRS-3 - Gigabits? Pfff, try terabits
    48 replies, posted
If I ever start a company that grows, we will need this. And there will be a free fap room where you have a private cubicle to fap to with air conditioning and complimentary kleenex.
all i can think of is: DOWNLOAD EVERY PORN EVER
Yes the download speed may all be well and good, but no harddrive can support writing that fast, it would take a a week to write what you downloaded in a second before you could see it.
[QUOTE=cosmic duck;20658438]Yes the download speed may all be well and good, but no harddrive can support writing that fast, it would take a a week to write what you downloaded in a second before you could see it.[/QUOTE] [img]http://www.maximumpc.com/files/u94712/patriot_40_SSDs.jpg[/img] Unless you have this. :smug:
[QUOTE=sbradford26;20658529][img]http://www.maximumpc.com/files/u94712/patriot_40_SSDs.jpg[/img] Unless you have this. :smug:[/QUOTE] Eww, sata 2.0 based drives. Needs more bandwidth, a PCI-e 2.0 x16 only has 7.8GB/s of bandwidth. 40.25TB/s is how much that line is, 41216GB/s. That means you would need bandwidth equivalent to nearly 5300 PCI-e2.0 x16 slots. Its a shitload of information at once, its like how a car has a gigabaud, don't make me explain baud rates, for all its can systems and uses between 3-5% of available bandwidth.
[QUOTE=cosmic duck;20658438]Yes the download speed may all be well and good, but no harddrive can support writing that fast, it would take a a week to write what you downloaded in a second before you could see it.[/QUOTE] All we need is 44TB of high-speed ram, and then we'll be able to download for a whole second. :science:
[QUOTE=Metalcastr;20656533]Oh God yes *fap fap fap* but we won't even see decent speeds until the ISP's decide to get with the times and install fiber to every home, with fast cheap plans like other countries.[/QUOTE] I can't even begin to fathom when that will be. It's high time people realized that there's less signal degradation in it as opposed to copper wire.
Australia?
Wouldnt be suprised to see some backbone networks installing these. Would be useful along side the IPv6 rollout. On a side note, dont hold out any hope for this kind of equipment leading to faster home connections. This is specifically for backbone networks, such as the main DNS servers, handling billions of requests.
Oh, I love technology. :h:
Holy.. balls. :psyboom:
Us end users won't see or feel this in action, as birkett said it's for the backbone networks.
So much for this "forever changing the Internet and its impact on consumers".
[QUOTE=Roast Beast;20671480]So much for this "forever changing the Internet and its impact on consumers".[/QUOTE] :crying: Someone save me from this overpriced 3Mbps DSL!!!!!!! I had hope D:
[QUOTE=Roast Beast;20654893] I hear you. We're supposed to be getting 25mbps down but I've never seen more than 12. And as soon as someone starts transferring a big file over the network the internet speed tanks.[/QUOTE] On my AT&T connection, the minute I start maxing out the download speeds by downloading something (500-600kb/s) the whole connection dies. I literally can't connect to Google while I'm downloading something.
[QUOTE=PvtCupcakes;20672683]On my AT&T connection, the minute I start maxing out the download speeds by downloading something (500-600kb/s) the whole connection dies. I literally can't connect to Google while I'm downloading something.[/QUOTE] AT&T routers are a real crap shoot, they all seem to have some maddening idiosyncrasy. My last one hated multiplayer games, if two people were gaming online at the same time more often than not it would reboot itself. The strange part was it handled large downloads and torrents just fine.
My teacher told my class something about how Cisco plans this stuff years in advance, that they had this idea already out they just needed to develop the chip (which apparently is a quad core that Cisco developed themselves) before they could release this. The difference between the Cisco CRS1 and CRS3 is just that one chip.
Wow, way to try and become a monopoly. But it's pricing is very well placed so people think twice about downloading all of Brazzers and Bangbros.
[QUOTE=breadlord;20675379]Wow, way to try and become a monopoly. But it's pricing is very well placed so people think twice about downloading all of Brazzers and Bangbros.[/QUOTE] You do realize that Cisco basically does have a monopoly already right? They do this stuff to stay ahead. When you setup anything above a home network such as a business or the internet, you go to Cisco. Their products are the best out there to get for that kind of work. They own 80% I believe it was of the networking market.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.