Sparkbrowser - Your new favourite web browser! - Hardware & Software

I find it hard to believe this kid is 17

[QUOTE=Ollih;26064371]I find it hard to believe this kid is 17[/QUOTE] Why? He sames like the common teenager. Arrogant, close minded, spreading of the douche-baggery. He's always right, never wrong. Always someone else's fault.

I'd still expect a bit more maturity from a 17-year old. He seems more like 12

[QUOTE=Ollih;26064624]I'd still expect a bit more maturity from a 17-year old. He seems more like 12[/QUOTE] But thats how most 17 year olds act these days.

[QUOTE=TehWhale;26064253]And pretty sure it uses an IE control not Gecko or WebKit[/QUOTE] no, thats the one thing he DID do, it does use webkit

His personal website is a brain melting what the fuck. If the browser wasn't that bad I'd give him credit, but seriously....

Anyone want to be me I could in a day make a better browser then sparkbrowser? [editline]15th November 2010[/editline] Thought to be fair, a 12 year old Newcomer to VB6 probably could.

I could code better with my dick... using only DOS commands.

[QUOTE=-Headcrab-;26069974]I could code better with my dick... using only DOS commands.[/QUOTE] I find that hard to believe as without the shift key, you can't really program.

he has a bifurcated dick

[QUOTE=nekosune;26063966]The rendering engine does not make the browser.[/QUOTE] "It's nothing like Chrome" means it has nothing in common. I was just pointing out that it does. The fact that it's a browser, for example.

[QUOTE=Panda X;26064525] Always someone else's fault.[/QUOTE] If you look back to page (I think 6) in my my live FB chat with him, he repeatedly told me that it was my fault that the installer failed to launch. lol [editline]15th November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=arienh4;26071214]"It's nothing like Chrome" means it has nothing in common. I was just pointing out that it does. The fact that it's a browser, for example.[/QUOTE] Jesus don't take everything so literally. Technically everything has something in common - it exists as information.

[QUOTE=arienh4;26071214]"It's nothing like Chrome" means it has nothing in common. I was just pointing out that it does. The fact that it's a browser, for example.[/QUOTE] to use an old example I used elsewhere in this forum, a ford luxury car, has similar things in use to a ford focus, including the fact they are cars, same company even etc, yet you would not say one was like the other.

A tree is like a brick. They're both made up of atoms.

[QUOTE=nekosune;26071340]to use an old example I used elsewhere in this forum, a ford luxury car, has similar things in use to a ford focus, including the fact they are cars, same company even etc, yet you would not say one was like the other.[/QUOTE] Except that the rendering engine of a browser defines the way the sites are rendered. It's a very inherent part of the browser. Contrary to what nekosune said before, the rendering engine, among other things, [b]does[/b] make the browser.

[QUOTE=arienh4;26072358]Except that the rendering engine of a browser defines the way the sites are rendered. It's a very inherent part of the browser. Contrary to what nekosune said before, the rendering engine, among other things, [b]does[/b] make the browser.[/QUOTE] Well, not really. If Firefox used Trident instead of Gecko, would it really make [I]that[/I] much of a difference?

[QUOTE=dag10;26073180]Well, not really. If Firefox used Trident instead of Gecko, would it really make [I]that[/I] much of a difference?[/QUOTE] Yes, because you'd have Firefox competing for the title of "World's Shittest Browser", instead of "World's Most Popular Browser".

Yes. It would.

Let's put it this way: If IE6 used Gecko, would it really that much of a difference in the experience of the browser? [editline]15th November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Sparkbrowser.com] The final build is going to be amazing! if you though sparkbrowser was fast, wait until you see it with the updated algorithms!!! other browsers wont even be able to compete [/QUOTE] What algorithms... :colbert: [editline]15th November 2010[/editline] Remember, don't post on his Guestbook or Facebook or Twitter. Were leaving him to talk to himself on his guestbook now, because all of those "people" are actually just him posting.

[QUOTE=dag10;26077052]Let's put it this way: If IE6 used Gecko, would it really that much of a difference in the experience of the browser? [/QUOTE] Uh, yeah. It would then be fully CSS 3 compliant. Pretty much all the issues people have with IE would be solved.

[QUOTE=arienh4;26078721]Uh, yeah. It would then be fully CSS 3 compliant. Pretty much all the issues people have with IE would be solved.[/QUOTE] Still would be just as exploit full just as buggy for stuff like cookies and javacript, the rendering engine is just PART a relatively large part but a part. a browser is more then a rendering engine, it is the javascript engine, how it handles cookies, how it handles caching, the whole UI

[QUOTE=nekosune;26078920]Still would be just as exploit full just as buggy for stuff like cookies and javacript, the rendering engine is just PART a relatively large part but a part. a browser is more then a rendering engine, it is the javascript engine, how it handles cookies, how it handles caching, the whole UI[/QUOTE] True, but it's still a very big part of the browser. The most important part, really, though not the only important part like you're implying I said.

The renderer is A important part, but a browser is much more then that.

[QUOTE=nekosune;26079451]The renderer is A important part, but a browser is much more then that.[/QUOTE] Can't have a browser without a rendering engine. Can have a browser without Javascript, cookies, GUI, et cetera.

[QUOTE=arienh4;26079707]Can't have a browser without a rendering engine. Can have a browser without Javascript, cookies, GUI, et cetera.[/QUOTE] Actually, you would not have a very good browser, same as if you had one without a rendering engine, technically useable, not very well, you need render, cookies, etc ALL together to make a browser.

[QUOTE=nekosune;26079842]Actually, you would not have a very good browser, same as if you had one without a rendering engine, technically useable, not very well, you need render, cookies, etc ALL together to make a browser.[/QUOTE] Ever heard of Lynx? Granted, it does [b]support[/b] cookies, but definitely not the way 'modern' browsers do.

Do text only browsers need a rendering engine?

[QUOTE=johan_sm;26080289]Do text only browsers need a rendering engine?[/QUOTE] That depends. How good are you at interpreting HTML and CSS in your head?

[QUOTE=arienh4;26079966]Ever heard of Lynx? Granted, it does [b]support[/b] cookies, but definitely not the way 'modern' browsers do.[/QUOTE] I use lynx, and yes it does support them fine , the ONLY difference is, it asks you do you want them. and my point is changed how by that?

[QUOTE=nekosune;26080400]I use lynx, and yes it does support them fine , the ONLY difference is, it asks you do you want them. and my point is changed how by that?[/QUOTE] Lynx is pretty much a rendering engine with limited cookie support.