• General Linux Chat and Small Questions v.2
    2,323 replies, posted
Help! I've been trying to get UCK to work on 11.10 Ubuntu, whenever it gets to the part where you select the package manager, it'd say something along the lines of "No package manager found." I've tried installing synaptic and muon with no luck...
[QUOTE=esalaka;34241693]Perhaps you need to chmod a-rwx,u=rwx .ssh [editline]16th January 2012[/editline] that is, only give perms to the httpd user [editline]16th January 2012[/editline] At least that's how my .ssh is set up[/QUOTE] Still nothing. I ran: [code]# chmod a-rwx,u=rwx /srv/http/.ssh[/code] Should I apply this to the key file in .ssh too? The server replies with: [code]Using username "http". Server refused our key[/code] And PuTTY says: [IMG]http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/9681/puttyerror.png[/IMG] [editline]19th January 2012[/editline] Should it really matter who owns .ssh since sshd is the one who is using the key and that is running as root? Is there perhaps a way to check which keys that sshd can find, maybe manually add a path to a config file somewhere?
[QUOTE=Surma;34290018] Should it really matter who owns .ssh since sshd is the one who is using the key and that is running as root? Is there perhaps a way to check which keys that sshd can find, maybe manually add a path to a config file somewhere?[/QUOTE] I believe it does matter. My .ssh folder has a permission of 700, owned by my user and group. And authorized_keys has a permission of 600, also owned by my user and group. And are you putting your .ssh folder in the right place? You say you're trying to use the http user, is their home folder /home/http or something else? If it's the system's Apache user account, the home is probably /var/www, so you would use /var/www/.ssh
[QUOTE=Surma;34290018]Should it really matter who owns .ssh since sshd is the one who is using the key and that is running as root?[/QUOTE] sshd only allows keys that nobody but the owner has access to. I was assuming you already had only user privileges on authorized_keys. PvtCupcakes is correct.
Well, I finally got Arch to a usable state! I think I have GDM installed correctly, and I have a really shitty uncustomized XFCE4 for the DE. Still lots to do!
[QUOTE=LieutenantLeo;34295685]Well, I finally got Arch to a usable state! I think I have GDM installed correctly, and I have a really shitty uncustomized XFCE4 for the DE. Still lots to do![/QUOTE] Awesome! After using Fedora and Ubuntu, I was convinced Gnome 3 would always run slowly on my netbook, but then I installed it myself via Arch and it's lightning-quick. It's a strangely powerful sensation to set up your own computer from the ground up.
Here's a picture by the way. [img_thumb]http://filesmelt.com/dl/dubya.png[/img_thumb]
i think i might try arch
[QUOTE=Ac!dL3ak;34301030]i think i might try arch[/QUOTE] It's worth it [editline]20th January 2012[/editline] This keeps happening when I try to install most packages in pacman [code] [root@jake-laptop jake]# pacman -S skype resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... Targets (42): lib32-alsa-lib-1.0.24.1-1 lib32-bzip2-1.0.6-1 lib32-dbus-core-1.4.16-1 lib32-expat-2.0.1-7 lib32-fontconfig-2.8.0-3 lib32-freetype2-2.4.8-1 lib32-gcc-libs-4.6.2-5.1 lib32-glib2-2.30.2-2 lib32-glibc-2.15-3.1 lib32-libdrm-2.4.30-1 lib32-libffi-3.0.10-3 lib32-libgl-7.11.2-2 lib32-libglapi-7.11.2-2 lib32-libice-1.0.7-1 lib32-libjpeg-turbo-1.1.1-1 lib32-libmng-1.0.10-6 lib32-libpciaccess-0.12.1-3 lib32-libpng-1.4.8-1 lib32-libsm-1.2.0-1 lib32-libtiff-3.9.5-1 lib32-libx11-1.4.4-1 lib32-libxau-1.0.6-2 lib32-libxcb-1.7-2 lib32-libxdamage-1.1.3-3 lib32-libxdmcp-1.1.0-1 lib32-libxext-1.3.0-1 lib32-libxfixes-5.0-1 lib32-libxi-1.4.5-1 lib32-libxrandr-1.3.2-1 lib32-libxrender-0.9.6-4 lib32-libxss-1.2.1-1 lib32-libxv-1.0.6-1 lib32-libxxf86vm-1.1.1-1 lib32-openssl-1.0.0.f-1 lib32-pcre-8.21-1 lib32-qt-4.8.0-1 lib32-sqlite3-3.7.9-1 lib32-util-linux-2.20.1-1 lib32-zlib-1.2.5-6 libmng-1.0.10-4 qt-4.8.0-2 skype-2.2.0.35-2 Total Installed Size: 198.78 MiB Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y (42/42) checking package integrity [######################] 100% error: lib32-libffi: key "06096A6AD1CEDDAC" is unknown error: key "06096A6AD1CEDDAC" could not be looked up remotely error: lib32-libmng: key "06096A6AD1CEDDAC" is unknown :: Import PGP key D1CEDDAC, "Laurent Carlier <lordheavym@gmail.com>", created 2011-10-30? [Y/n] y (42/42) checking package integrity [######################] 100% error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package) Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. [/code]
Try clearing your pacman cache alternatively try making sure that you merged pacman 4.x's new pacman.conf with your current one
[QUOTE=Lyoko774;34302285]Try clearing your pacman cache alternatively try making sure that you merged pacman 4.x's new pacman.conf with your current one[/QUOTE] I've tried clearing the cache, with no luck. How do I merge them?
[QUOTE=LieutenantLeo;34300935]Here's a picture by the way. [img_thumb]http://images.4chan.org/g/src/1327023129001.png[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] rehost it you dolt
[QUOTE=LieutenantLeo;34302404]I've tried clearing the cache, with no luck. How do I merge them?[/QUOTE] If you use vim (or gvim) for editing, then use this command and work out the differences (use gvimdiff if you use gvim). [code] vimdiff /etc/pacman.conf /etc/pacman.conf.pacnew [/code]
[highlight]WARNING! WARNING! XORG 1.11 VULNERABILITY FOUND, RENDERS A LOCKED SYSTEM UNSECURED![/highlight] [B]A Xorg server vulnerability which makes it possible to kill any screensaver / screen locker using the [CTRL + ALT + Multiply] keyboard combination has been discovered yesterday. [/B](multiply is the "*" character on the Numpad) [B][url]http://www.webupd8.org/2012/01/xorg-111-vulnerability-allows-attackers.html[/url][/B]
Luckily my little brother doesn't know this. All is well.
[QUOTE=Brock Obama;34307903][highlight]WARNING! WARNING! XORG 1.11 VULNERABILITY FOUND, RENDERS A LOCKED SYSTEM UNSECURED![/highlight] [B]A Xorg server vulnerability which makes it possible to kill any screensaver / screen locker using the [CTRL + ALT + Multiply] keyboard combination has been discovered yesterday. [/B](multiply is the "*" character on the Numpad) [B][url]http://www.webupd8.org/2012/01/xorg-111-vulnerability-allows-attackers.html[/url][/B][/QUOTE] Doesn't work for me and I'm using SLiM. The screen goes black and loads SLiM back up again.
[QUOTE=Sc00by22;34308501]Doesn't work for me and I'm using SLiM. The screen goes black and loads SLiM back up again.[/QUOTE] Are you sure you're using a version of X that has the vuln?
Hmm, just tried this in my Arch VM, and it does in fact work. Sort of odd.
[QUOTE=esalaka;34308604]Are you sure you're using a version of X that has the vuln?[/QUOTE] 1.11.3
[QUOTE=thelinx;34306170]rehost it you dolt[/QUOTE] i fixed it
Yep, 1.11.1 has the vuln.
Doesn't work for me (probably because I use CDM).
Can anyone help me? [url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1157074[/url]
What's a nice music player I can use in the terminal?
What window manager should I go with? I'm debating between awesome, fluxbox, subtle, and quarkewm, but other recommendations are welcome. I'm on arch, and my computer is good enough to use any wm. What are you guys using? Edit: Also, I use multiple monitors, actually three, with eyeinfinity, if I can get that working under arch...
What did LXDE use again? Openbox? Yeah, Openbox.
[QUOTE=Brock Obama;34307903][highlight]WARNING! WARNING! XORG 1.11 VULNERABILITY FOUND, RENDERS A LOCKED SYSTEM UNSECURED![/highlight] [B]A Xorg server vulnerability which makes it possible to kill any screensaver / screen locker using the [CTRL + ALT + Multiply] keyboard combination has been discovered yesterday. [/B](multiply is the "*" character on the Numpad) [B][url]http://www.webupd8.org/2012/01/xorg-111-vulnerability-allows-attackers.html[/url][/B][/QUOTE] And that's exactly why we will never be able to get out of a frozen fullscreen application without escaping to a fullscreen terminal.
Just make a obscure keyboard shortcut to xkill
So tired of the shit laptops they give us for our computer class, which, when the keys aren't broken off and the wireless router isn't kaput, runs WINDOWS XP, I shall now work off a persistent Ubuntu Live USB.
[QUOTE=Elecbullet;34318350]So tired of the shit laptops they give us for our computer class, which, when the keys aren't broken off and the wireless router isn't kaput, runs WINDOWS XP, I shall now work off a persistent Ubuntu Live CD.[/QUOTE] sorry, I'm not exactly well educated on these things, but how can a CD be persistent? is it rewriteable?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.