Man it was fucking rough for us when that happened. All our listers used and liked that program since you could rapid-fire crop, tilt, and fix images. All we have now is FastStone and we stopped trying to correct our images unless it's required.
Actually using it for the screensaver, surprised it still works under 10 to be honest.
http://horobox.co.uk/u/reag/2018-06-26_01-48-02.png
My office is 7 miles away and I share a desk with my room mate. Feelsbadman.jpg
I used to use Picasa but stopped because it didn't support gifs back then. I just use Faststone these days. Nothing really as good as the Mac Preview app though. Picasa was great.
aren't the cool kids still using irfanview on windows these days
unpopular opinion: i don't bother with an alternative photo viewer on windows 10
(or windows 7, or windows 8)
it does what i want it to do which is show me the photo
I was completely fine with the old photo viewer and the new W10 one was mostly fine, but the zooming in the new W10 viewer was more annoying to use than just spinning the scroll wheel right away. I really don't care about much else beyond being able to quickly flip through a bunch of photos and quickly zoom around. If I wanted to crop/resize/rotate I'd just open the photo in Paint.net or something.
https://blog.openai.com/openai-five/
Default Photo Viewers suck, Picasa Photo Viewer is perfect. When it's not bugged, it just uses the sorting of the folder you open the picture from, it keeps your zoomstate for a session, so if you look at multiple pictures and go back and forth, they stay at the exact same place for the whole session. This is pretty much a must have feature for me, and since no other viewer I've tried has done this, I'll keep using it until Microsoft eventually breaks it.
Also, fuck IfranView or even nomacs with their overloaded UIs, I just want to look at the pictures, not your UI.
How microsoft managed to worsen their image viewer is a mistery for me. XP's one worked just okay.
Using the registry tweak to bring the Win 7 photo viewer back, no complaints. Previews images when opened.
Windows 7 Photo Viewer is dated, but damn did it work great.
Registry tweak? Why would you need that.
Because they disabled it in 10?
Okay, I've found the explanation - I upgraded to Windows 10, so it just carried over (though I had to change my defaults). If you install from scratch you need to fuck around with the registry. Never knew they actually disabled it.
Someone from /g/ recommended jpegview and I haven't really looked back. Just a really simple program
Windows Sets makes it look munted though
https://tenryuu.blob.core.windows.net/astrid/18-06-26_22-22-13-7706b81eb80f57b350d957b0961b56121a4962709b43d8aaca.png
Until they remove it in a couple builds
If the default win10 image viewer wasn't very clearly the Gallery app from a phone it might be a little more usable
525W of power? Jesus christ we're going to need two PSU's to SLI these things...
Jeez that thing is huge!
Good thing SLi is dead then!
Also that power draw puts my Vegas to shame
Does anyone have the video with the soldering station that had palm trees and chill music in the background it was posted here before.
As someone who works with pixel art a lot, the default Windows 10 photo viewer is a nightmare, since it blurs everything to shit when you zoom in super far. It has no hopes of being used in any kind of professional environment.
JPEGView masterrace.
Because I have some really shitty caddy for a secondary drive in my laptop that began falling out recently, I realized that it would be a super great idea to enable bitlocker on both of the drives in my laptop.
Yes I know that bitlocker is backdoored by NSA or some shit but if I cared about that, I wouldn't be using Windows 10 to begin with.
Also since I'm in US right now, any tech junk I should look for that is definitely not available in Europe and can do multi-voltage?
It's a prototype PCB. For verification and development.
Note the 4x 40mm fans dedicated to the VRMs, 3 different debug connectors, 2.54mm headers being used for jumpers, and debug LEDs.
Can you imagine what the reference card is going to sound like with 525W of power running through those VRMs?
It'll be like standing behind a jet engine
That's a pretty big die though, bigger than Vega, on its way to Titan V/V100 size.
The reference card isn't going to eat 525W.
In early development, you won't have any of your power gating implemented, which means the entire thing is both on, and running at full speed.
The BGA footprint says absolutely nothing about die size. The die sits on top of the BGA package - the package is being used to spread out the connections.
They need a lot of pads because of how much VRAM they have, but it says nothing about the size of the die.
¿Que?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
CIPWTTKT&GC 0x2E - Abort, Retry, Fail?
