• CIPWTTKT&GC v0x13 (v19): Ivy Bridge Edition
    10,002 replies, posted
SEK is the new oops 404.
Here, let me word it for SEK since he's too retarded to do it normally. Driving while distracted is illegal in many countries. In the law books this includes the usage of IEM's or any other headphones during driving of a motorized vehicle or riding of motorcycles. That's what he's trying to say. He just can't fucking word a sentence worth a damn.
[QUOTE=Brt5470;36677848]SEK is the new oops 404.[/QUOTE] I remember when some of us thought 404 was an alt of SEK. [editline]8th July 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=SEKCobra;36677815]Apparently you still didin't read it. t's illegal in many countries [B][h2]because they cancel most outside noise.[/h2][/B] So you can't steer any vehicles, that includes bikes.[/QUOTE] You need to work on sentence structure/wording things better. You literally make it sound like headphones make it impossible to turn a car wheel. That's what I'm poking at if you haven't realized already.
[QUOTE=Dr. Deeps;36677880]Here, let me word it for SEK since he's too retarded to do it normally. Driving while distracted is illegal in many countries. In the law books this includes the usage of IEM's or any other headphones during driving of a motorized vehicle or riding of motorcycles. That's what he's trying to say. He just can't fucking word a sentence worth a damn.[/QUOTE] But his sentence was perfectly understandable
Smartest person on this page is Gman003 apparently [editline]8th July 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Makol;36677884]I remember when some of us thought 404 was an alt of SEK. [editline]8th July 2012[/editline] You need to work on sentence structure/wording things better. You literally make it sound like headphones make it impossible to turn a car wheel. That's what I'm poking at if you haven't realized already.[/QUOTE] Work on your reading comprehension instead
But he's perfectly right. You guys read it wrongly or are just jumping on it because it's slightly weirdly worded. I had no problem interpreting what he typed. edit: or, alright, you guys can just get in ahead of me and say pretty much exactly what I did. That's cool, too. :c
Nonono. The sentence alone would be bad. But I based it on the text he wrote, where he was specifically talking about using the earphones while riding his bike. [editline]8th July 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Makol;36677884]I remember when some of us thought 404 was an alt of SEK.[/QUOTE] That doesn't even make any sense.
I'll just stop by and say that it's some pretty peaceful roads I'm driving on - 40% of the road is even going through a wood where cars aren't allowed to drive. And I don't think there's a law against it in Denmark - 50% of the people cycling is wearing in-ear headphones. Anyhow, thanks for the help, and I think I'll drop the extra dough on those headphones. And while I expected some sort of discussion about headphones, I didn't expect a discussion regarding the laws.
Shut the fuck up, all of you. You're going around in circles and just provoking each other.
[QUOTE=wingless;36678003]Shut the fuck up, all of you. You're going around in circles and just provoking each other.[/QUOTE] cipwicket in a nutshell
It's cipwi[B]t[/B]cket you [B]dickhead[/B]!!! !!This post contains sarcasm!!
[QUOTE=wingless;36678003]Shut the fuck up, all of you. You're going around in circles and just provoking each other.[/QUOTE] what would the internet be without drama???
[QUOTE=Protocol7;36678043]what would the internet be without drama???[/QUOTE] A nice place to be.
[QUOTE=SEKCobra;36678041]It's cipwi[B]t[/B]cket you [B]dickhead[/B]!!! !!This post contains sarcasm!![/QUOTE] sipwiket
[QUOTE=SEKCobra;36677967]N That doesn't even make any sense.[/QUOTE] We thought someone was you since they acted just like you.
New topic for discussion: What are the current rumors regarding Haswell? I haven't really heard anything about it recently.
[QUOTE=Dantai;36677928] Work on your reading comprehension instead[/QUOTE] Make me.
Does anyone want to play some killing floor?
[QUOTE=gman003-main;36678068]New topic for discussion: What are the current rumors regarding Haswell? I haven't really heard anything about it recently.[/QUOTE] Never heard of it, I think, fill me in on it.
[QUOTE=gman003-main;36678068]New topic for discussion: What are the current rumors regarding Haswell? I haven't really heard anything about it recently.[/QUOTE] Dumb people in sensationalist headlines are thinking it will have 14 cores and a 35MB L3 cache, because of a (faaaake) leak. The people also don't seem to realize it was talking about Haswell-EP so were saying all kinds of bullshit like "Pfft, gamers don't need 14 cores!!". Otherwise, probably going to end up a good chip. [editline]9th July 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Makol;36678083]Never heard of it, I think, fill me in on it.[/QUOTE] Intel's next x86 μarch.
[QUOTE=Makol;36678066]We thought someone was you since they acted just like you.[/QUOTE] So you are some kind of hivemind, because I never saw anyhting like that in here. I also doubt that they acted like me.
[QUOTE=SEKCobra;36678119]So you are some kind of hivemind, because I never saw anyhting like that in here. I also doubt that they acted like me.[/QUOTE] It happened last thread I think, I'm too lazy to check.
[QUOTE=superstepa;36677912]But his sentence was perfectly understandable[/QUOTE] It made no sense to me.
[QUOTE=wingless;36678109] Intel's next x86 μarch.[/QUOTE] Oh.
[QUOTE=wingless;36678109]Dumb people in sensationalist headlines are thinking it will have 14 cores and a 35MB L3 cache, because of a (faaaake) leak. The people also don't seem to realize it was talking about Haswell-EP so were saying all kinds of bullshit like "Pfft, gamers don't need 14 cores!!". Otherwise, probably going to end up a good chip. [editline]9th July 2012[/editline] Intel's next x86 μarch.[/QUOTE] Oh, there's also another rumor of ditching the IGP in favor of rendering everything using AVX2. But that would probably be after Haswell if they do.
[QUOTE=wingless;36678166]Oh, there's also another rumor of ditching the IGP in favor of rendering everything using AVX2.[/QUOTE] Wouldn't that be shooting themselves in the foot?
[QUOTE=wingless;36678050]A nice place to be.[/QUOTE] Ha, who would want that?
[QUOTE=GoDong-DK;36678185]Wouldn't that be shooting themselves in the foot?[/QUOTE] The IGPs are known to be underperforming and Intel just doesn't want to put the effort into it, it's a lost cause whatever way they move. Larrabee was going to be the last hope for it, realistically but we all know where that's gone (Xeon Phi). AVX2 is promising a lot and it would cut down on die size (or give them more room to work) for one thing.
You know, I had that idea as well. The SSE/AVX SIMD units function quite like a GPU core in many ways. You would, however, need quite a lot of them - probably in the 20-60 range. Since we're unlikely to get that many actual cores for a while, though, this would require detaching SIMD units from the rest of the core. Potentially very tricky.
Anyone looking for a cheap SSD check your local MicroCenter if you have one. I got two Intel 320 120gb SSDs for $90 each on thrusday.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.