• "How Many Processes I Am Running" Thread
    395 replies, posted
55, Win7 Professional x64. Running: 1 open folder, SysMonitor, Steam, Firefox, uTorrent, Folding@Home. AMD Phenom 9750 Quad @ 2.4Ghz, 4 Gb Ram, ATI Radeon HD 4350 512mb. WTF, 28% CPU Usage?!
XP x86, SP3, 53, 18-21% memory usage.
46 on Windows 7 Professional, 64 bit, 36 64 bit processes, 10 32 bit processes.
70 CPU usage 2%
40 - Windows XP Professional Commit Charge: 690M / 2440M Why is firefox.exe using 168,700K memory?
57 processes on Windows Vista 32-bit
71, Windows 7 32bit. And I have fuck all open :(
33 - running win xp
How the hell is this still alive
48, Windows 7 64 bit.
12, but three are from chrome. This doesn't include the windows system processes. Thirty five with every single process shown. Oh and Vista Ultimate 32-bit.
65, Vista Home Premium. I have a ton of shit open
22, iPhoneOS 3.1.2 [img]http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/6464/quickshottrti.png[/img] [editline]04:02PM[/editline] :smug:
61 processes with 25 percent of physical memory used. 7 ultimate x64 with 8 gigs of ram
Oh ya. [img]http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/7562/desktopq.png[/img]
[QUOTE=Zoo;18470320]Oh ya. [img]http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/7562/desktopq.png[/img][/QUOTE] i gave you a tool happy birthday!! :toot: :toot: [editline]10:51AM[/editline] happy motherfucking birthday :toot: :sax: :toot: :taco: :taco:
36 processes, 539 threads, 11786 handles. CPU usage: ~5%.
52. Windows 7 Ultimate x64
[QUOTE=Zoo;18470320]Oh ya. [img]http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/7562/desktopq.png[/img][/QUOTE] XP 64 bit? What reason could you have to own that?
74. Aww yeah.
[quote] Seth: mmm i made nice sandwich me: lol me: holy shit i'm telling everyone [/quote] combineguru said that i'm running after effects and firefox.. 72 processes and 50% mem usage.. 6gb
74.
[QUOTE=arbayer2;18400240]55, Win7 Professional x64. Running: 1 open folder, SysMonitor, Steam, Firefox, uTorrent, [U]Folding@Home[/U]. AMD Phenom 9750 Quad @ 2.4Ghz, 4 Gb Ram, ATI Radeon HD 4350 512mb. [U]WTF, 28% CPU Usage?![/U][/QUOTE] Say again?
How this thread is still going is beyond me. 538M/2464M with 40, how you managed to double the memory usage and more than quad the amount of processes, I'll never know [editline]01:36PM[/editline] [QUOTE=BmB;18501478]Say again?[/QUOTE] Folding@Home is a tool designed especially to use your CPU for complex gene bending or something along those lines
Processes: 50 CPU Usage: 0% Windows XP SP3
[QUOTE=ButtsexV2;18488745]XP 64 bit? What reason could you have to own that?[/QUOTE] Well clearly the 64-bit architecture is much faster and has a handling load of an exponential value more than the standard 32-bit operating system.
[QUOTE=Zoo;18517181]Well clearly the 64-bit architecture is much faster and has a handling load of an exponential value more than the standard 32-bit operating system.[/QUOTE] He was wondering why you got [b]XP[/b] 64bit. Even though you are dumb that does not make everybody else dumb enough to not know why people use 64 bit.
[QUOTE=sbradford26;18517323]He was wondering why you got [b]XP[/b] 64bit. Even though you are dumb that does not make everybody else dumb enough to not know why people use 64 bit.[/QUOTE] Why are you so fast to calling people dumb?
[QUOTE=Zoo;18517181]Well clearly the 64-bit architecture is much faster and has a handling load of an exponential value more than the standard 32-bit operating system.[/QUOTE] I know that, but XP 64 bit has so many compatibility issues. Nothing works the way it should with it. I only have one rig with XP 64 on it, and it's a music production rig. (fun fact 24 GB RAM and a Xeon, would make your rig feel so tiny if it didn't have an HD3550 :v:).
Windows XP 64-bit is fine. It may have been incompatible with everything when it first came out, but nowadays, there are 64-bit versions of pretty much all drivers.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.