• Fermi GeForce = GTX 4XX
    1,778 replies, posted
[QUOTE=whatnow V2;22899869]so the GTX 485 / new fermi card will be out later this year, 512 cores.[/QUOTE] finally time to see what it can actually do eh?
I'm expecting a lot, since the 470 is quite a bit slower than the 480 (speaking high end) , imagine what those extra cores do.
make me a burrito i hope
Haven't been very active in this thread. But is there any news on a GTX 495/GTX 490?
not that i know of. I'd rather SLI two cards than have one, but that's just me
[QUOTE=whatnow V2;22905098]I'm expecting a lot, since the 470 is quite a bit slower than the 480 (speaking high end) , imagine what those extra cores do.[/QUOTE] clocks are also higher on 485
[QUOTE=whatnow V2;22906956]not that i know of. I'd rather SLI two cards than have one, but that's just me[/QUOTE] SLi set ups don't choke at higher resolutions compared to an equivalent single card.
[QUOTE=PunchedInFac;22908430]SLi set ups don't choke at higher resolutions compared to an equivalent single card.[/QUOTE] what?
i love my cards so much now, they never get over 80c and idle at around 45-47c and when i do absolutely nothing but just leave it on overnight it goes down to 42-43c and on a overnight cold boot its at 37-38c. using msi afterburner to keep the fan speeds in check. [img]http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/1018/msia.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Odellus;22908597]what?[/QUOTE] I dont really have an example but here is a generalized one. Where 2 lower end cards in SLi = 1 higher end single card, the FPS in higher resolutions are on average better for the cards in SLi. [editline]12:00AM[/editline] [QUOTE=The_Newb2;22909965]i love my cards so much now, they never get over 80c and idle at around 45-47c and when i do absolutely nothing but just leave it on overnight it goes down to 42-43c and on a overnight cold boot its at 37-38c. using msi afterburner to keep the fan speeds in check. [/QUOTE] Mine is a horizontal line at 100% from 0 C to infinity
[QUOTE=PunchedInFac;22910038]I dont really have an example but here is a generalized one. Where 2 lower end cards in SLi = 1 higher end single card, the FPS in higher resolutions are on average better for the cards in SLi. [editline]12:00AM[/editline] Mine is a horizontal line at 100% from 0 C to infinity[/QUOTE] You need proof because that sounds like a bunch of bullshit to me.
[QUOTE=Odellus;22911107]You need proof because that sounds like a bunch of bullshit to me.[/QUOTE] two 5770s are about equivalent to a 5870, right? the CF'd 5770s perform better at larger res's.
not much better, if at all, since they both have 1gb vram
[QUOTE=PunchedInFac;22911829]two 5770s are about equivalent to a 5870, right? the CF'd 5770s perform better at larger res's.[/QUOTE] No, that's just the 5770 CF outperforming the 5870. [editline]08:47PM[/editline] Also, don't install the new 10.6 drivers. They cut my FPS in half in RFG.
i won't, i'm on nVidia, and this is an nVidia thread :whatup:
Fucking love my 470. I can play any game out there.
Get 500 dollars Buy GTX 480 ??? Loss of profit [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Shitposting / why reply?" - birkett))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=Magman77;22937890]Get 500 dollars Buy GTX 480 ??? Loss of profit[/QUOTE] 1/10 troll post.
[QUOTE=Magman77;22937890]Get 500 dollars Buy GTX 480 ??? Loss of profit[/QUOTE] you're an idiot
[QUOTE=PunchedInFac;22908430]SLi set ups don't choke at higher resolutions compared to an equivalent single card.[/QUOTE] MultiGPU setups are notoriously inconsistent. A single GPU is going to scale 100%. Multiple GPU's might now.
the 400 series scales retardedly well in SLI
[QUOTE=Magman77;22937890]Get 500 dollars Buy GTX 480 ??? Loss of profit [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Shitposting / why reply?" - birkett))[/highlight][/QUOTE] You be trolling this thread.
[QUOTE=M_B;22945665]the 400 series scales retardedly well in SLI[/QUOTE]Which, honestly, surprised me.
[QUOTE=ClaBrendon;22947435]Which, honestly, surprised me.[/QUOTE] Not me. Every generation since the 8000 series has seen an improvement of some sort with SLI scaling when compared to a previous one. At least that's my observation.
[QUOTE=Takkun10;22914948]Fucking love my 470. I can play any game out there.[/QUOTE] so does my super magic 260... come back in two years, then you may own me. [editline]03:50PM[/editline] [QUOTE=FunnyGamer;22947678]Not me. Every generation since the 8000 series has seen an improvement of some sort with SLI scaling when compared to a previous one. At least that's my observation.[/QUOTE] 260s are a prime example... they scale somewhere around 190% in SLI. that's damn good.
Wasn't SLI scaling retardedly bad some time back? Well, 190% is fucking good if you ask me.
[QUOTE=kobilica;22950635]Wasn't SLI scaling retardedly bad some time back? Well, 190% is fucking good if you ask me.[/QUOTE] as far as i heard... the 8xxx series and 9xxx series had very mixed results.
[QUOTE=FunnyGamer;22947678]Not me. Every generation since the 8000 series has seen an improvement of some sort with SLI scaling when compared to a previous one. At least that's my observation.[/QUOTE] err no not the 9000 series. if anything it backpedaled with the 9000 series.
GTX 460 launched today. [url]http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/geforce-gtx-460-gf104-fermi,review-31944.html[/url] [url]http://www.techspot.com/review/299-palit-inno3d-geforce-gtx-460/[/url] Gets 5830 performance for a lower price.
[QUOTE=Wiggles;23302287]GTX 460 launched today. [url]http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/geforce-gtx-460-gf104-fermi,review-31944.html[/url] [url]http://www.techspot.com/review/299-palit-inno3d-geforce-gtx-460/[/url] Gets 5830 performance for a lower price.[/QUOTE] [url]http://www.guru3d.com/article/geforce-gtx-460-review/[/url] 460 runs pretty cool, and in some games outperforms the 5850. Has my buy.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.