• My new rig I just built :D
    72 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Yumyumbublegum;19263012]Why don't you, I haven't had a single BSOD or crash on 7. I can't say the same for XP though.[/QUOTE] actually I can, even if I tried i can't BSoD my current Xp machine or my dad's 98 >_>
[QUOTE=Mr Drover;19262990]Seriously, he literally gave 300 bucks to Runescape.[/QUOTE] So like, why did you PM me asking what my runescape username was? [editline]12:28AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Yumyumbublegum;19263012]Why don't you, I haven't had a single BSOD or crash on 7. I can't say the same for XP though.[/QUOTE] You probably haven't been using it long enough.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~;19262997]Actually It broke as soon as I updated mine to the latest 9.3 for vista. yes I did uninstall and did a driversweeper clean. and yet it breaks because the INF file wasn't found. causing me to go straight down to XP again. Even my dad was disgusted and he uses 98.[/QUOTE] It's clearly something on your end because nobody else is complaining about the 9.3 drivers not working on Vista.
[QUOTE=MrT99;19263039]So like, why did you PM me asking what my [b]runescape[b/] username was?[/QUOTE] why the fuck did you bring runescape into this you horse fucker.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~;19263032]actually I can, [b]even if I tried[/b] i can't BSoD my current Xp machine or my dad's 98 >_>[/QUOTE] Like that's saying much, you've showed your incompetence in some of your other posts.
[QUOTE=Yumyumbublegum;19263064]It's clearly something on your end because nobody else is complaining about the 9.3 drivers not working on Vista.[/QUOTE] does a shitty 140 sempron and SP1 of premium and 2100 HD graphics have anything to do with breaking my drivers. [editline]01:30PM[/editline] [QUOTE=deathrat;19263073]Like that's saying much, you've showed your incompetence in some of your other posts.[/QUOTE] like wise to you. I actually still am running BSoD free.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~;19263078]does a shitty 140 sempron and SP1 of premium and 2100 HD graphics have anything to do with breaking my drivers. [editline]01:30PM[/editline] like wise to you. I actually still am running BSoD free.[/QUOTE] yes
[QUOTE=MrT99;19263039]So like, why did you PM me asking what my runescape username was?[/QUOTE] Coverup fail. First person on this forum I genuinely don't like.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~;19263078] like wise to you. I actually still am running BSoD free.[/QUOTE] What? I have no idea what you're saying.
[QUOTE=Mr Drover;19263099]Coverup fail.[/QUOTE] Since runescape was mentioned, hell yes :bang:
[QUOTE=MrT99;19263039]So like, why did you PM me asking what my runescape username was? [editline]12:28AM[/editline] You probably haven't been using it long enough.[/QUOTE] I've been using it since March.
[QUOTE=deathrat;19263102]What? I have no idea what you're saying.[/QUOTE] Why don't you leave if you have no problems then. Shit this thread has de-railed.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~;19263126]Why don't you leave if you have no problems then. Shit this thread has de-railed.[/QUOTE] There was never any topic to discuss in the first place.
[QUOTE=Yumyumbublegum;19263143]There was never any topic to discuss in the first place.[/QUOTE] Fine, then we should probably leave, before another bombshell drops.
And neither of you have used 7, so you can't debate its stability.
[QUOTE=Yumyumbublegum;19263160]And neither of you have used 7, so you can't debate its stability.[/QUOTE] Why do I want Direct 11 at a lagtastic OS, when Xp is running quite smooth and fine.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~;19263181]Why do I want Direct 11 at a lagtastic OS, when Xp is running quite smooth and fine.[/QUOTE] Why would I want to use an outdated piece of software when my up to date, more advanced OS is running smooth and fine.
[QUOTE=Yumyumbublegum;19263203]Why would I want to use an outdated piece of software when my up to date, more advanced OS is running smooth and fine.[/QUOTE] It's gonna end up with the same result. so why bother argue about it. And anyways what the fuck is wrong with XP.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~;19263181]Why do I want Direct 11 at a lagtastic OS, when Xp is running quite smooth and fine.[/QUOTE] When your talking about a computer that will run it fine(the one in the OP), it's not going to be any more "lagtastic" than XP.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~;19263240]It's gonna end up with the same result. so why bother argue about it. And anyways what the fuck is wrong with XP.[/QUOTE] It's outdated, its successors offer much more.
[QUOTE=deathrat;19263247]When your talking about a computer that will run it fine(the one in the OP), it's not going to be more "lagtastic" than XP.[/QUOTE] I might have a cpu and the ram to handle it, but yet again why do I actually need 7 when i have XP. + I ran the beta on it and it took for ever like 20 minutes for it to start up. this was build 7100 point taken yummy, but even Xp is better then vista, anyways I don't have the money or the patience to install 7 at the moment. Gonna wait until Sp2 comes out, then i will considerate it. Otherwise XP is final, end of debate, move on.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~;19263286]I might have a cpu and the ram to handle it, but yet again why do I actually need 7 when i have XP. + I ran the beta on it and it took for ever like 20 minutes for it to start up. this was build 7100[/QUOTE] That's why they call it a beta.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~;19263286]I might have a cpu and the ram to handle it, but yet again why do I actually need 7 when i have XP. + I ran the beta on it and it took for ever like 20 minutes for it to start up. this was build 7100 point taken yummy, but even Xp is better then vista, anyways I don't have the money or the patience to install 7 at the moment. Gonna wait until Sp2 comes out, then i will considerate it. Otherwise XP is final, end of debate, move on.[/QUOTE] If that sempron rig is what you are running I am not surprised. Would that even meet the min reqs for it?
[QUOTE=n00bEmpty;19263312]That's why they call it a beta.[/QUOTE] AND? I give a shit about your comments why? [editline]01:40PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Veers;19263323]If that sempron rig is what you are running I am not surprised. Would that even meet the min reqs for it?[/QUOTE] it does suprisingly.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~;19263286]I might have a cpu and the ram to handle it, but yet again why do I actually need 7 when i have XP. + I ran the beta on it and it took for ever like 20 minutes for it to start up. this was build 7100[/QUOTE] Then obviously there was something wrong, and I'm not saying you NEED 7, I'm saying there really isn't a point in using an 8-year-old software, if you have the chance to use a more updated, and overall-better one. [editline]07:42PM[/editline] [QUOTE=~Kiwi~;19263326]AND? I give a shit about your comments why?[/QUOTE] Because he brought up a valid point... :geno:
I'm running build 7100 till I get Windows 7 :sigh: and it takes around 2 minutes from startup to ready and I'm running this on a shitty Dell Studio 15 :saddowns:
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~;19263326]AND? I give a shit about your comments why? [editline]01:40PM[/editline] it does suprisingly.[/QUOTE] That's weird, seeing as windows 7 ultimate runs perfectly on my Eee PC (1005ha) I would have thought pretty much anything could run it.
[QUOTE=Veers;19263361]That's weird, seeing as windows 7 ultimate runs perfectly on my Eee PC (1005ha) I would have thought pretty much anything could run it.[/QUOTE] were talking a 140 sempron Am3 with 2GB of ram and hd2100 intergrated.I don't see a n270/260 Atom with 1GB of ram and 950GMA running 7 beta quite smoothly, but I just think it's my mobo capping it due to HT limits.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~;19263388]were talking a 140 sempron Am3 with 2GB of ram and hd2100 intergrated.[/QUOTE] Oh I see, well you can't really expect that much out of a $35 processor.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~;19263326]AND? I give a shit about your comments why? [editline]01:40PM[/editline] it does suprisingly.[/QUOTE] Because you were running the beta dipshit, of course it isn't gonna run perfectly.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.