[QUOTE=codenamecueball;27548263]yes, I know. Doesn't stop my friends dad owning 3 of them, all with NEC Spectravision 2390 displays.[/QUOTE]
When I'm ridiculously rich, I will have two of the most expensive Macs available. One to use for.... something. The other to destroy for a laugh.
[QUOTE=Within;27548447]Maybe if I could stream porn to every FP user from my computer due to the sheer length of the cable, it would be a somewhat justified price.
[editline]20th January 2011[/editline]
Why are those so expensive? I mean, why is it 100 times better than my $150 G35?[/QUOTE]
You spent $150 on Logitech G35s.
Haha.
I never got the price for HDMI cables. They just send 1's & 0's they either work or they don't.
[quote=the beatles;27548707]i never got the price for hdmi cables. They just send 1's & 0's they either work or they don't.[/quote]
qft
[QUOTE=The Beatles;27548707]I never got the price for HDMI cables. They just send 1's & 0's they either work or they don't.[/QUOTE]
There's nothing to get. They're just overpriced to rake in money from ignorant people who don't know any better.
i thought over like 50 ft the $10 ones start to have trouble and the signal is disrupted? dunno why a consumer would have a 50 ft cable though
monoprice reviews don't lie motherfucker
[QUOTE=The Beatles;27548707]I never got the price for HDMI cables. They just send 1's & 0's they either work or they don't.[/QUOTE]
Are you kidding me? Research shows the purer the gold on the end of HDMI cables, the more magic they transmit. Ergo, more magic means you get a better picture. Therefore Monster is totally justified in charging what they charge.
[url]http://hubpages.com/hub/Sigma-200-500mm-f28-EX-DG-Telephoto[/url]
$28,999.00 super telephoto lens
[QUOTE=.ediT;27548782]i thought over like 50 ft the $10 ones start to have trouble and the signal is disrupted? dunno why a consumer would have a 50 ft cable though
monoprice reviews don't lie motherfucker[/QUOTE]
It's more around 100 feet, and that's what boosters are for.
[QUOTE=.ediT;27548822][url]http://hubpages.com/hub/Sigma-200-500mm-f28-EX-DG-Telephoto[/url]
$28,999.00 super telephoto lens[/QUOTE]
resonable considering the ƒ/2.8 aperture
guess i wont keep my htpc in the attic for my basement home theater then
[editline]20th January 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=codenamecueball;27548863]resonable considering the ƒ/2.8 aperture[/QUOTE]
ridic expensive, not overpriced :o
[QUOTE=Within;27548447]
Why are those so expensive? I mean, why is it 100 times better than my $150 G35?[/QUOTE]
(Forgot to mention, they're called Orpheus)
They're quite easily the best headphones ever made. They're only weakness, which is present with all es headphones I've heard of is a weakness in the force of bass. The quality in replication is unmatched though. Another reason is that is comes with a fancy tube amp. They're probably handmade too.
[img]http://bruitages.be/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/sennheiser_orpheus.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Within;27548447]Maybe if I could stream porn to every FP user from my computer due to the sheer length of the cable, it would be a somewhat justified price.
[editline]20th January 2011[/editline]
Why are those so expensive? I mean, why is it 100 times better than my $150 G35?[/QUOTE]
My $22 HD202 are better than your G35, lets be serious.
[QUOTE=Shadaez;27549104]My $22 HD202 are better than your G35, lets be serious.[/QUOTE]
no pro gamer label on side no care
Anything from here: [url]http://www.lessloss.com/[/url]
The prices make sense though, given the sensitivity of high end audio-components. If you're willing to shell out the money, you can afford it no doubt. Most of the people who would buy those parts own recording studios.
[QUOTE=Within;27548447]
Why are those so expensive? I mean, why is it 100 times better than my $150 G35?[/QUOTE]
Oh, and I'm not trying to offend you, but those are extremely gimmicky. Easily a 1000 times as good. I understand it might be a bit upsetting, whenever someone buys an expensive product and later learns about it's true [i]value[/i] they get very defensive. Be open minded about it. Investigate frequency ranges before making an uneducated response.
[QUOTE=Biotoxsin;27549222]Anything from here: [url]http://www.lessloss.com/[/url]
The prices make sense though, given the sensitivity of high end audio-components. If you're willing to shell out the money, you can afford it no doubt. Most of the people who would buy those parts own recording studios.
Oh, and I'm not trying to offend you, but those are extremely gimmicky. Easily a 1000 times as good.[/QUOTE]
Some of it is BS but I'm thinking others are actually not bad deals.
[url]http://www.amazon.co.uk/XFX-Radeon-Dual-Link-Standard-Graphics/dp/B0027CXXI0[/url]
Amazing value. It even includes a free Tom Clanc. I mean who wouldn't want that? Yet, every time I recommend this amazing deal it seems to fall on deaf ears. :confused:
People do not understand, that with the right parts and some handy work you can have an ultra rig for around 1300 euros :v:
Skullcandy.
[img]http://images.ifguk.co.uk/products/1858/1858-large1.jpg[/img]
Take any pair of headphones, add ~$40 to the price, and put some goofy fucking design on it and you have Skullcandy. Granted, a couple of their designs look really nice, but I'm not about to spend twice as much for a good-looking pair of headphones.
[QUOTE=Biotoxsin;27549067](Forgot to mention, they're called Orpheus)
They're quite easily the best headphones ever made. They're only weakness, which is present with all es headphones I've heard of is a weakness in the force of bass. The quality in replication is unmatched though. Another reason is that is comes with a fancy tube amp. They're probably handmade too.
[img_thumb]http://bruitages.be/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/sennheiser_orpheus.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]
well I know what I'm buying if I ever get stupidly rich
[QUOTE=Biotoxsin;27549067](Forgot to mention, they're called Orpheus)
They're quite easily the best headphones ever made. They're only weakness, which is present with all es headphones I've heard of is a weakness in the force of bass. The quality in replication is unmatched though. Another reason is that is comes with a fancy tube amp. They're probably handmade too.
[img_thumb]http://bruitages.be/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/sennheiser_orpheus.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Biotoxsin;27549222]Oh, and I'm not trying to offend you, but those are extremely gimmicky. Easily a 1000 times as good. I understand it might be a bit upsetting, whenever someone buys an expensive product and later learns about it's true [i]value[/i] they get very defensive. Be open minded about it. Investigate frequency ranges before making an uneducated response.[/QUOTE]
Since you like to present yourself as if you're superior, correct this for bonus points:
[quote]They're only weakness[/quote]
[editline]21st January 2011[/editline]
And while we're at it, I'm not going to be defensive because, applying the same logic, I don't understand why you need to get offensive because you don't like a certain product.
Oh, Bose. Don't know why it hasn't been posted.
Look at Plasma Speakers.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEeWtBAE5LY&feature=player_detailpage#t=27s[/media]
All of the audio is coming from the arc. In order to have one able to do bass it needs to be nearly a dozen feet long and would draw more current then a welder. It has zero distortion to it when done properly. They are used in some systems as tweeters currently.
[QUOTE=Jaehead;27544661]apparently toughbooks can take a direct hit from a bullet and still work fine[/QUOTE]
So can macbooks: [url]http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/26/macbook-pro-takes-bullet-like-a-champ/[/url]
[img]http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/02/mbp_bullet.jpg[/img]
[url]http://www.elpj.com/purchase/index.html[/url]
laser record players
granted they are handmade and quite amazing
[QUOTE=B!N4RY;27544096][img_thumb]http://www.uncrate.com/men/images/2008/01/beats-headphones.jpg[/img_thumb]
[editline]edit[/editline]
These kind of expensive products are simply there to scam the idiots who believes everything that they read, and that the more expensive an item is, the better it is in general.[/QUOTE]
Oh my gawd B!N4RY this. This. THIS.
[QUOTE=Shadaez;27551943]Oh, Bose. Don't know why it hasn't been posted.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=B!N4RY;27544096][img_thumb]http://www.uncrate.com/men/images/2008/01/beats-headphones.jpg[/img_thumb]
[editline]edit[/editline]
These kind of expensive products are simply there to scam the idiots who believes everything that they read, and that the more expensive an item is, the better it is in general.[/QUOTE]
Beats is even more of a scam
[QUOTE=MacTrekkie;27552370]So can macbooks: [url]http://molesthoughts.wordpress.com/2007/07/10/who-needs-a-bullet-proof-vest-when-you-carry-a-macbook-pro/[/url]
[img_thumb]http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/02/mbp_bullet.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]
Yes, though can that MacBook be used in extreme heat, extreme cold, high vibration environments or have a spill-proof keyboard? Nope. MacBooks are pretty durable as a consumer machine, though they're not suited for situations where a Toughbook is needed.
[editline]20th January 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=B!N4RY;27552807]Beats is even more of a scam[/QUOTE]
Monster's "Beat Box" is $500. A $500 fucking iPod Speaker Dock. That's hugely overpriced even compared Bose...
nah bro, but that macbook will create the extreme heat dough
Oh, how could I possibly forget this:
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/4Dj2T.png[/IMG]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.