[QUOTE=Heinserver;40737093]Is bridging possible with GeForce GTX 670?[/QUOTE]
Do you mean SLI? If so then it can support up to 4 GTX 670s.
[QUOTE=GreenDolphin;40737199]Do you mean SLI? If so then it can support up to 4 GTX 670s.[/QUOTE]
I ment 2x GTX670
Also, IT'S ALIVE! A small monster has been born
[img]http://puu.sh/2YIk1.jpg[/img]
[editline]22nd May 2013[/editline]
[video=youtube;VIABNmeycMU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIABNmeycMU[/video]
[QUOTE=Heinserver;40738580]I ment 2x GTX670[/QUOTE]
Ah if you're thinking of SLI then I generally don't advise it despite the impressive gains. Very few people need it since a single card is sufficient enough for those who game at 1920x1200 resolutions and below. It's more useful in situations where you're running a resolution higher than 1200p, are 3D gaming or multi-monitor gaming.
The option is up to you though if you are thinking of doing it. If so then you'll need a more powerful PSU.
Also noticed you're using that PSU while waiting for your other parts come in. Can't say we didn't warn you if something does go wrong.
[editline]22nd May 2013[/editline]
I just noticed your motherboard doesn't support SLI so that option is out of the window. It still supports crossfire though.
[QUOTE=Heinserver;40738580]I ment 2x GTX670
Also, IT'S ALIVE! An abomination has been born
[/QUOTE]
I think you mean that.
[QUOTE=Terabytez;40736621]Holy fuck man, thumb that shit.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Heinserver;40738580][video=youtube;VIABNmeycMU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIABNmeycMU[/video][/QUOTE]
See you preparing an extinguisher that's not to be used for electrical fires :v:
Work on that cable management, for christ sake.
I am thinking of multi-monitoring, atleast 2 screens on 1920x1200
[QUOTE=Heinserver;40742401]I am thinking of multi-monitoring, atleast 2 screens on 1920x1200[/QUOTE]
Inb4 buys two 27" 1080p Acers then posts here "I done a bad thing."
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Meme reply" - Craptasket))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=GreenDolphin;40741147]See you preparing an extinguisher that's not to be used for electrical fires :v:[/QUOTE]
Isn't that a black label fire extinguisher? A Carbon Dioxide fire extinguisher? Aren't they most suited to electrical fires?
[QUOTE=Anthrax713;40743155]Isn't that a black label fire extinguisher? A Carbon Dioxide fire extinguisher? Aren't they most suited to electrical fires?[/QUOTE]
I've never seen a Carbon Dioxide fire extinguisher with a hose like that.
[img]http://www.essentialfiresafety.co.uk/images/T/co2-mri.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Leestons;40743959]I've never seen a Carbon Dioxide fire extinguisher with a hose like that.
[img]http://www.essentialfiresafety.co.uk/images/T/co2-mri.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
True.
OP, what fire extinguisher is that in the video?
From what's viewable of the labelling in the video I can see it's classed under; A, B, C, and either D or F. Class E is used to treat electrical fires.
It's not a case of whether it runs or not, it's a case of how long it runs for and how long it is useful to you.
So your 'fu fp' video is redundant and shows that you probably don't have enough knowledge to build a PC yourself, and you don't have the brains to listen to people who [i]have[/i] built before and only trying to help you.
IT says against Class A B C E fire, it's 7kg 7G powder? With co2 pattern, it's back from 1994/5
Perhaps it's an excellent idea to keep that extinguisher next to your "project"
[QUOTE=Heinserver;40751196]IT says against Class A B C E fire, it's 7kg 7G powder? With co2 pattern, it's back from 1994/5[/QUOTE]
If that fire extinguisher is really older than me, it is probably going to kill you before the fire.
Yeah arn't fire extinguishers supposed to be recharged/replaced on a regular basis?
[editline]23rd May 2013[/editline]
Yeah
[QUOTE=WIKIPEDIA]
Internal Maintenance:
Water - Annually (some states) or 5 years (NFPA 10, 2010 edition)
Foam - every 3 years
Wet chemical & CO2 - every 5 years
Dry chemical and dry powder- every 6 years
Halon and clean agents - every 6 years.
Cartridge operated dry chemical or dry powder - annually
Stored pressure dry chemical mounted on vehicles - annually
[/quote]
I find it funny how he just ignores everyone and carries on posting updates to his abomination of a computer as if nothing's wrong.
Like on the first page where everybody joked about it - nothing was cared about that day
Alright guys, thanks for helping me choose a GPU, I decided to get the GTX670, after a couple of weeks, since the pices drop because of the new series (Was told on page 2 or 3 I think).
About the PSU, I will definately change it when I'm purchasing my GPU, maybe even earlier.
The case? Not sure, I understand that it's fugly but that's your opinion, my table doesn't have a opinion.
RAM? It's fine for now, actually, it's not that bad at all, even windows rated it 7.5, I searched for reviews and they were all positive, AND IT HAS LED's WHICH MEANS FASTER!
[img]http://puu.sh/2Zsjf.jpg[/img]
Why are you running them in single channel?
[QUOTE='[EG] Pepper;40752713']Why are you running them in single channel?[/QUOTE]
Single channel means you don't have to divide the speed. This way you get the full 1333MHz instead of 666.5MHz per channel (why would you do that when you don't have two computers?). This is why quad channel is really only present on motherboards that support more than one computer (CPU), otherwise it's just stupid.
On a different note; there's nothing wrong with your RAM, OP - 1330MHz is fine and it won't be a bottleneck in your computer for the vast majority of tasks.
[QUOTE=GoDong-DK;40752753]Single channel means you don't have to divide the speed. This way you get the full 1333MHz instead of 666.5MHz per channel (why would you do that when you don't have two computers?). This is why quad channel is really only present on motherboards that support more than one computer (CPU), otherwise it's just stupid.
On a different note; there's nothing wrong with your RAM, OP - 1330MHz is fine and it won't be a bottleneck in your computer for the vast majority of tasks.[/QUOTE]
most people actually have their motherboard running at 1333mhz anyways - even with 1600mhz sticks
[QUOTE=GoDong-DK;40752753]Single channel means you don't have to divide the speed. This way you get the full 1333MHz instead of 666.5MHz per channel (why would you do that when you don't have two computers?). This is why quad channel is really only present on motherboards that support more than one computer (CPU), otherwise it's just stupid.
On a different note; there's nothing wrong with your RAM, OP - 1330MHz is fine and it won't be a bottleneck in your computer for the vast majority of tasks.[/QUOTE]
Not sure if you're being serious, but you're talking about DDR, dual channel is different.
[QUOTE='[EG] Pepper;40753399']Not sure if you're being serious, but you're talking about DDR, dual channel is different.[/QUOTE]
i think he went the major technobabble way. or atleast hope.
[QUOTE=tratzzz;40753414]i think he went the major technobabble way. or atleast hope.[/QUOTE]
In that case he forgot to mention the flux capacitor.
[QUOTE=tratzzz;40753414]i think he went the major technobabble way. or atleast hope.[/QUOTE]
I guess I didn't hammer through the border quite hard enough. But I digress.
You need to replace the PSU with a nuclear reactor inside a kettle.
[QUOTE='[EG] Pepper;40754800']You need to replace the PSU with a nuclear reactor inside a kettle.[/QUOTE]
Will do,
B.t.w. I now have 8 gigs of ram, I'm planning to get a second 8 gigs of that same brand, they turned out good instead of terrible
Before you all go OMG 8 GIGS IS MORE THE ENUF.
Well, I need the additional ram for photoshopping/rendering in vegas.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
