Biggest asshole design moves - Hardware & Software

[QUOTE=cas97;29510743]Wimps. Try and solve this: [img_thumb]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2174/2268237733_cda4a1dbb3.jpg?v=0[/img_thumb] from the [url=http://random.irb.hr/signup.php]Quantum Random Bit Generator Service[/URL].[/QUOTE] 2(4-6)*7(-5) If you do not know the answer please reload the page and you'll get an easier question. One F5 later we get: [img]http://random.irb.hr/latexrender/pictures/de00b45000ca5a600947c513b74fb4b4.gif[/img]

[QUOTE=cas97;29510743]Wimps. Try and solve this: [img_thumb]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2174/2268237733_cda4a1dbb3.jpg?v=0[/img_thumb] from the [url=http://random.irb.hr/signup.php]Quantum Random Bit Generator Service[/URL].[/QUOTE] [img_thumb]http://i.imgur.com/AmKU3.png[/img_thumb] how was that difficult

[QUOTE=Chickens!;29510981]2(4-6)*7(-5) If you do not know the answer please reload the page and you'll get an easier question. One F5 later we get: [img_thumb]http://random.irb.hr/latexrender/pictures/de00b45000ca5a600947c513b74fb4b4.gif[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] I successfully registered. :D [editline]29th April 2011[/editline] I'm gonna be honest, I used wolframalpha :(

These are fun :D (if they mean with 'least' 'smallest') [img]http://gyazo.com/a6aafaa7197f28df5e75c5659c9326fd.png[/img]

Seems like Captcha to keep humans out and computers in.

[QUOTE=cas97;29510743]Wimps. Try and solve this: [img_thumb]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2174/2268237733_cda4a1dbb3.jpg?v=0[/img_thumb] from the [url=http://random.irb.hr/signup.php]Quantum Random Bit Generator Service[/URL].[/QUOTE] Aren't partial derivatives for functions that are dependent on multiple variables? (which is not the case)

[QUOTE=Number-41;29511379]Aren't partial derivatives for functions that are dependent on multiple variables? (which is not the case)[/QUOTE] 50/50 Chance here i'm gonna say no.

[QUOTE=Number-41;29511379]Aren't partial derivatives for functions that are dependent on multiple variables? (which is not the case)[/QUOTE] Yes and no. If you have only one variable though, the other partials would be 0.

[QUOTE=Killerelf12;29511552]Yes and no[/QUOTE] So i was right either way. Or was i wrong either way? Fucking Quantum shit :psyduck:

I always answer questions with a quantum answer. I'm both right and wrong at the same time.

[QUOTE=Killerelf12;29511552]Yes and no. If you have only one variable though, the other partials would be 0.[/QUOTE] Most unclear answer ever...

[QUOTE=CountNoobula;29441966]You are obviously very misinformed... That is expected I suppose... You are probably like 12. Mac's can right click. Infact, other than gaming (which the gap is quickly closing in) anything you can do on Windows, I can do better on Mac. I would suggest you snip your post[/QUOTE] ^ this is the biggest asshole design move ever. the mac fanbase that thinks they own s00pr komputorz because its mac and was hip 15 years ago

[QUOTE=Number-41;29512700]Most unclear answer ever...[/QUOTE] Yes partial derivatives usually apply to functions of multiple variables. But if a variable has a zero as a coefficient, then it doesn't appear in the equation, but you can still have a partial derivative of it anyway.

chiclet keyboard, y u so expensive? oh yeah, because you have to bunch it up into a tiny space. why not make it as big as a normal keyboard, and flatten the keys? [editline]29th April 2011[/editline] [img]http://localhostr.com/file/runP3Ka/glkldg.png[/img] wasnt too hard

[QUOTE=Number-41;29512700]Most unclear answer ever...[/QUOTE] "up to 15% or more"

[QUOTE=krazipanda;29512821]^ this is the biggest asshole design move ever. the mac fanbase that thinks they own s00pr komputorz because its mac and was hip 15 years ago[/QUOTE] Its not Apple's fault, its just the whole "think different" thing attracts the hipsters like flies to shit.

[QUOTE=lavacano;29515464]"up to 15% or more"[/QUOTE] [media]http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/mathematically_annoying.png[/media]

Spotify isn't available in the US :saddowns:

[QUOTE=krazipanda;29512821]^ this is the biggest asshole design move ever. the mac fanbase that thinks they own s00pr komputorz because its mac and was hip 15 years ago[/QUOTE] I hate people who are like "MAC IS AWESOME AND BETTER THAN YOUR COMPUTER", but I also hate it when PC fanboys say "LOL YOU CAN'T RIGHT CLICK!!!". If you're going to make an argument, please at least get your facts right. Macs do allow right clicking.

[QUOTE=Fatal-Error;29444365][img_thumb]http://osxdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/can-your-mac-do-this.jpg[/img_thumb] Also, enjoy your shitty UI.[/QUOTE] what is that a screenshot from, a gateway 2000?

Non-modular PSU's with either too many or long as fuck cables. Or in some cases, both. The TX600W has cables up the fucking ying-yang. It's like, how many people still run on IDE power to warrant [i]four fucking cables for it?[/i] Good god I've never seen more than 3 IDE slots on a motherboard and that was back when everything ran off of it (one for hard drive, two for CD and/or HDD)

[QUOTE=krazipanda;29517749]what is that a screenshot from, a gateway 2000?[/QUOTE] [url]http://mrdoob.com/128/IE6[/url] heheheehhe

[QUOTE=FFStudios;29517854]Non-modular PSU's with either too many or long as fuck cables. Or in some cases, both.[/QUOTE] Or way too short to do any good cable management.

GFWL is okay. If they don't use dedicated servers, they could at least add cross platform. [editline]29th April 2011[/editline] fucking hate bigass video card blocking my sata ports

[QUOTE=FullStreak12;29520487]GFWL is okay. If they don't use dedicated servers, they could at least add cross platform. [editline]29th April 2011[/editline] fucking hate bigass video card blocking my sata ports[/QUOTE] i like GFWL solely for the fact that i can still talk to my friends over XBL even though I don't own a 360 anymore

[QUOTE=FFStudios;29520713]i like GFWL solely for the fact that i can still talk to my friends over XBL even though I don't own a 360 anymore[/QUOTE] tell them to sign into Windows live messenger, then?

[QUOTE=Shadaez;29520948]tell them to sign into Windows live messenger, then?[/QUOTE] uh no i haven't used MSN since '06 and i can't be fucked to use it again plus they're console gamers, they're JUST not-lazy enough to turn the damn thing on in the first place

[QUOTE=kaze4159;29482360]Reminds me of this one I took [img_thumb]http://i54.tinypic.com/2qkhz5l.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] I never knew you couldn't read threads if you were banned. Surely you could just go offline?

[QUOTE=krazipanda;29517749]what is that a screenshot from, a gateway 2000?[/QUOTE] No, my gateway 2000 has DOS on it anyway.

[QUOTE=Kenneth;29526321]I never knew you couldn't read threads if you were banned. Surely you could just go offline?[/QUOTE] You stay "reading the thread" for ~15 minutes after you exit the thread. Sir Whoopsalot got banned while he was reading the thread or < 15 minutes after he read it.