I just noticed, I can access the HDD of every computer in the whole company network using my Domain admin logon, and the use of administrative shares.
my Co-Worker is currently freaking out, because There are several txt files on his desktop containing ascii penises.
yesterday i walked home listening to the samsung ringtone
i regret nothing
[QUOTE=Dr. Deeps;39896376]And that $25 filled his little Cavalier's tank.
$25 in my tank probably won't get me near a half a tank.[/QUOTE]
I put $20 in and the gauge went from about 1/8 full to around half full. I live in the city, so it isn't too bad.
[QUOTE=lavacano;39896821][img]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5733962/ShareX/2013-03/2013-03-12_23-21-44.png[/img]
I'm curious how everyone tags their Steam friends, because I noticed a lot of screenshots show the friends being tagged based on how "close" the friendship is, and meanwhile I just tag based on where I know them from.[/QUOTE]
I generally tag my FL based off which community they are from. There are people I know specifically through Facepunch, video games, RL, other forums I visit, Youtube friends, Twitter, my job, etc.
Makes it easier for me.
I don't organise my steam friends at all
[QUOTE=latin_geek;39898360]What-if XKCD actually did a great article about [URL="http://what-if.xkcd.com/31/"]Fedex's bandwidth[/URL]. He didn't mention the shipping costs, sadly.[/QUOTE]
'
And he didn't mention the time involved taking them off the media.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/1jkjmzb.png[/IMG]
eh. works for me.
[QUOTE=Goz3rr;39897376]I don't get these people, it's like saying 240p is better than 1080p[/QUOTE]
Don't talk again.
[editline]13th March 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=wingless;39897319]I'd say you're living in the future when you realize that this:
[t]http://i.imgur.com/k60UgW6.jpg[/t]
holds 30 - 40 photos, yet this:
[img]http://i.imgur.com/uZhfpeh.jpg[/img]
holds literally tens of thousands, that can easily be manipulated, corrected, stored and backed up while being something like a 50th of the size.
That's how I know we're living in the future.[/QUOTE]
That's somewhat of an unfair comparison. Sure you can hold a total amount of images, but the quality of that few analog film images has more to it than volume.
If volume of media was the concern cellphones would be the best movie making device.
[QUOTE=Goz3rr;39897376]I don't get these people, it's like saying 240p is better than 1080p[/QUOTE]
You're going to summon the vinyl thread regulars and then we're all going to have a really shitty time
[editline]13th March 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=Brt5470;39899313]Don't talk again.
[editline]13th March 2013[/editline]
That's somewhat of an unfair comparison. Sure you can hold a total amount of images, but the quality of that few analog film images has more to it than volume.
If volume of media was the concern cellphones would be the best movie making device.[/QUOTE]
Even if you shot RAW you'd still be able to hold a couple thousand photos, which for most purposes would be equal to film (?). And for most purposes, even large JPEGs are enough.
[QUOTE=Brt5470;39899313]You can hold a total amount of images, but the quality of that few analog film images has more to it than volume.
If volume of media was the concern cellphones would be the best movie making device.[/QUOTE]
I'm talking from perspective of devices that can product the same, if not better quality images as those that good film cameras can, not just phones.
I wasn't aware you could tag friends on Steam
Fine, I'll bite
[IMG]http://puu.sh/2h0mi[/IMG]
they're all badly organized though. If only I could drag and drop or something.
just decided to purge my steam friends, most of these people i added ages ago and haven't talked to them in forever
was too lazy to do it before but this discussion spurred me to do it
[QUOTE=wingless;39899360]I'm talking from perspective of devices that can product the same, if not better quality images as those that good film cameras can, not just phones.[/QUOTE]
Wait? Produce better quality images than film?
Haha what?
Digital and film has their own unique ups and downs. It's not fair to say one is exclusively better than the other either.
Film has higher resolution and dynamic range. That's still basically fact. Doesn't mean I prefer it over digital though.
Yes but digital has much finer grains at higher iso and is much more economical in the long run. Although I don't disagree with you, but i'd stick with digital as editing the raw files can usually produce good results either way
I'm trying to update my brother's Galaxy Xcover with Kies
[img]http://i.imgur.com/k8ors46.png[/img]
thanks Samsung
[editline]13th March 2013[/editline]
If any of you know any Korean please help
it says bow down to kim jong un you infidels
[QUOTE=some redditor on me complaining about jollyjack knowing shit nothing about anatomy]The "no internal organs" complaint is valid when you're talking about, say, Soul Calibur because it is (ostensibly) realistic, but some guy's stylized doodle isn't really fair game for this.
tl;dr he's obviously not trying to be realistic. His art is stylized and cartoony.[/QUOTE]
[I]hurk[/I]
please murder yourself
[QUOTE=B!N4RY;39899730]Yes but digital has much finer grains at higher iso and is much more economical in the long run. Although I don't disagree with you, but i'd stick with digital as editing the raw files can usually produce good results either way[/QUOTE]
Finer grain? That's not always a good thing. Problem with Digital Noise is it looks like digital noise. But that's besides my point. I wasn't debating digital being more convenient or cheaper, just it doesn't surpass film's visual fidelity yet, particularly photography, movie recording is another ball game.
What does my cat think about this conversation?
[t]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/32264365/kiisu/2013-03-07%2023.15.41.jpg[/t]
[t]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/32264365/kiisu/2013-03-07%2023.16.07.jpg[/t]
[t]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/32264365/kiisu/2013-03-13%2018.38.59.jpg[/t]
The best format for both audio and image/video is probably "in person".
Unless the band has an equipment problem or the image/video is porn stars 70 years later.
[QUOTE=esalaka;39899757]I'm trying to update my brother's Galaxy Xcover with Kies
[img]http://i.imgur.com/k8ors46.png[/img]
thanks Samsung
[editline]13th March 2013[/editline]
If any of you know any Korean please help[/QUOTE]
Anybody have that World Lens app?
[QUOTE=esalaka;39899757]I'm trying to update my brother's Galaxy Xcover with Kies
[img]http://i.imgur.com/k8ors46.png[/img]
thanks Samsung
[editline]13th March 2013[/editline]
If any of you know any Korean please help[/QUOTE]
It says "you're using Kies? you poor misguided soul"
[editline]13th March 2013[/editline]
although it's Korean so I suppose it could be "poor misguided Seoul"
[QUOTE=MTMod;39900705]Anybody have that World Lens app?[/QUOTE]
unless the android version supports it, the iphone one doesn't support korean
only english, french, spanish, italian and german
[QUOTE=MTMod;39900705]Anybody have that World Lens app?[/QUOTE]
word lens doesn't recognise hangeul
here you go esalaka
[t]http://puu.sh/2h4pw/7fffc63805[/t]
hope this helps
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
