[QUOTE=helifreak;50820013]No it's using a monochrome palette with #FCFCFC and #1F1F1F, 1 bpp.[/QUOTE]
Right, they probably would have put something like that in, for efficiency. That's what I get for only skimming the documentation.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;50820017]Gman003-main Gman003-main Gman003-main why is gif still a thing?[/QUOTE]
Because Google won't get off their arse and implement APNG.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;50820017]Gman003-main Gman003-main Gman003-main why is gif still a thing?[/QUOTE]
GODDAMMIT I'M RIGHT HERE YOU DON'T HAVE TO INVOKE THE RITUAL OF SUMMONING
It's still a thing because Chrome and IE don't support APNG, only Chrome and Opera support animated WebP, and a lot of software that allows "animated images" doesn't allow for stuff explicitly designed as a video format because that shit's complicated. GIF doesn't work particularly well but it works fucking everywhere which sometimes is what counts.
Now that we summoned you, is it gihf or jif :v:
[QUOTE=BackSapper;50820082]Now that we summoned you, is it gihf or jif :v:[/QUOTE]
Google will tell you how to pronounce it
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/iugg6l4.png[/IMG]
[QUOTE=BackSapper;50820082]Now that we summoned you, is it gihf or jif :v:[/QUOTE]
Hard G sound. Soft G could be confused for JIF, the predecessor to JFIF.
[QUOTE=BackSapper;50820082]Now that we summoned you, is it gihf or jif :v:[/QUOTE]
Fuck.
[editline]2nd August 2016[/editline]
Off.
[QUOTE=Snickerdoodle;50820094]Google will tell you how to pronounce it
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/iugg6l4.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]
What an accurate way to pronounce gif
[quote]
Winter5427: gtx 980 = $200
Winter5427: newest graphics card came out
Winter5427: 1080 TI = $200
Winter5427: better than 980 and cheaper but 980 has more better components
Rum Ham: are you high
Rum Ham: Winter5427: 980 = $600 Winter5427: 1080 = $200
Rum Ham: Winter5427: gtx 980 = $200
Winter5427: no
Winter5427: those are the prices
Winter5427: not joking
Winter5427: those are the actual prices
Winter5427: because the components in 980
Winter5427: more expnesive
Winter5427: and better quality
Winter5427: its like this
Winter5427: metal car vs plastic car
[/quote]
???
[QUOTE=Rika-chan;50820308]???[/QUOTE]
Reminds me of a guy who said the 700 series was better than the 900 because it used more power and ran hotter. :what:
[QUOTE=Lyokanthrope;50820315]Reminds me of a guy who said the 700 series was better than the 900 because it used more power and ran hotter. :what:[/QUOTE]
They clearly graduated from AMD university.
More cores + higher tdp = better product
[QUOTE=Rika-chan;50820326]They clearly graduated from AMD university.
More cores + higher tdp = better product[/QUOTE]
He also tried to argue that vintage mainframe PCs and the like were still useful because they used so much power.
I don't understand the logic but whatever.
I wonder if he makes the same claim about cars.
"I mean it gets 10 miles to the gallon so it MUST be good"
Found the post I made about it last year :v:
[url]https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1467888&p=47893593&viewfull=1#post47893593[/url]
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;50820395]Did you just update today?[/QUOTE]
Nah, July 31st, restarted a few times today without issue and the Reddit page says it was compromised at 12:50 PM on the 2nd.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;50820381]Audacity and Classic Shell got [URL="https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/4vw21h/massive_psa_do_not_download_classic_shell_read/"]compromised[/URL].[/QUOTE]
FOSSHub in its entirety did, apparently.
But...why?
[editline]3rd August 2016[/editline]
[url=https://twitter.com/CultOfRazer]Their twitter is pretty funny though.[/url]
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;50820437]Because [URL="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqbkm47qBxDj-P3lI9voIAw"]danooct1[/URL] needed a new virus.
Naw the fact that FOSSHub got rekt sucks.
Well hey guess I'm not updating a lot of the software that I'm being nagged at to update till given the all clear.[/QUOTE]
Oh, funny thing, danooct1 uploaded a video on it [I]7 minutes[/I] after you posted that :v: (or was already uploading it, which is likely)
When someone says specifically that they are not a mac fanboy
yet directly behind them there's an Apple AirPort base station.
He's lying through his teeth.
omg Windows 10 anniversary update finally brought the Ubuntu subsystem to Windows 10!
I can finally stop coding in god awful virtual machines and terrible dual boot setups
[QUOTE=B!N4RY;50820831]omg Windows 10 anniversary update finally brought the Ubuntu subsystem to Windows 10!
I can finally stop coding in god awful virtual machines and terrible dual boot setups[/QUOTE]
I just wish they'd use Ubuntu 16.04 rather than 14.04, but they will update it somewhere in the future.
Also little tip. Run the cmd/powershell terminal as admin to get access to things like ping. For some reason, these don't work unless you run the terminal with elevated privileges.
[QUOTE=kaukassus;50820848]I just wish they'd use [B]Ubuntu 16.04 rather than 14.04[/B], but they will update it somewhere in the future.
Also little tip. Run the cmd/powershell terminal as admin to get access to things like ping. For some reason, these don't work unless you run the terminal with elevated privileges.[/QUOTE]
This hardly makes any differences when it comes to bash utilities to be honest. Ubuntu 14.04 had a really good run, I don't mind using it a bit longer.
If PPAs work, I imagine some people will be providing them for updated tools (Python 3.5 etc.).
Your text editor can still run on Windows, that's fine, just need to update the base tools that are in the Ubuntu thingie.
Edit:
[url]https://launchpad.net/~fkrull/+archive/ubuntu/deadsnakes[/url]
My Anniversary Update is still downloading.
[QUOTE=B!N4RY;50820910]This hardly makes any differences when it comes to bash utilities to be honest. Ubuntu 14.04 had a really good run, I don't mind using it a bit longer.[/QUOTE]
I won't mind using 14.04, but having to install a ton of PPA's and register a lot of repositories just to get access to recent versions of Software (Python3.5, NodeJS, Ruby and their respective package managers, and possibly a current version of GCC would be neat) is pretty annoying when the alternative to that is simply running apt-get install.
Should be good enough to do a little work, and then do the final build on a real computer running a real operating system, using a real kernel.
What's so bad about apt-get, I'm actually curious since it seems to get so much shit yet never a reason why, it's always [I]just werked[/I] for me :v:
T420 with core i5/8gb memory and 128gb ssd installed for ~$200 yes or no? Need a notebook to hold me over for a few months of freshman year before the new macbook pros drop.
[t]https://helifreak.duckdns.org/image/20160803114017957.png[/t]
What the fuck.
It's the google Chrome effect
Could be worse.
[t]https://helifreak.duckdns.org/image/2016022317025139.png[/t]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
