• Intel Sandy Bridge - Why you should wait one month for a new PC!
    813 replies, posted
In 2012 this will be out dated for there will be 1 extra pin on the new socket
[QUOTE=Scotty.;27171239][url]http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2011/01/03/intel-sandy-bridge-review/1[/url] Review on bit tech. Get some fucking tissues ready.[/QUOTE] :gizz:
Shit, they overclock the i5-2500K to 4.9GHz with a H50.
Motherboard reviews are also popping up, here's the ASUS P8P67 series. [url]http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=677&Itemid=69[/url] [editline]3rd January 2011[/editline] Benchmarkreviews also has Sandy Bridge reviews! [url]http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=664&Itemid=63[/url]
[QUOTE=Alcapwne;27174114]In 2012 this will be out dated for there will be 1 extra pin on the new socket[/QUOTE] And with that the LGA 1155. LGA1156 sounds stupid, don't you agree?
Soooo going to be upgrading to this when it comes out. Either i7-2600K or i5-2500K. Probably going to be getting a pretty nice mobo too. I don't see a point in overclocking it in the near future though, if just gaming.
[QUOTE=PelPix123;27175976][url]http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1934536/intels-sandy-bridge-sucks-hollywood-drm[/url] Was this posted yet?[/QUOTE] Do you have another source for that?
[QUOTE=Scotty.;27171239][url]http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2011/01/03/intel-sandy-bridge-review/1[/url] Review on bit tech. Get some fucking tissues ready.[/QUOTE] 4.9GHz overclock? Jeez I was expecting ~4.2GHz overclock from the K version, this is even better [editline]wef[/editline] [quote]CPU from 3.3GHz to 4.5GHz, a safe everyday level[/quote] 4.5 is an average OC from a 2500K dear god
[QUOTE=Jaehead;27176420]4.5 is an average OC from a 2500K dear god[/QUOTE] [img]http://www.fohguild.org/forums/attachments/screenshots/152221d1285823821-girls-who-broke-your-heart-thread-mother-god-super-troopers.jpg[/img]
What incredible news! Why was I rated rainbows on my last post?
The guys over at [H]ardForum compiled a nice list of the review, here's the thread: [url]http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1574006[/url]
are these stock coolers? [media]http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/cpu/intel/sandybridge/review/_DSC7051.jpg[/media] [editline]wefe[/editline] because if they are, they look like such an improvement
I think that's the stock cooler for the old extreme models.
yeah, nevermind,they're not anyways anandtech says you can hit 4.4 GHz on the 2500K using a stock cooler I'm going with an aftermarket cooler and hopefully aim for 5+ GHz
Using a BIOS mod to remove the ~47 multiplier lock to go to ~55 (i think, numbers are off a bit), the guy in this thread is claiming to get 5.4 [B]on air.[/B] [url]http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=15952[/url]
So, I'm just having enough money to buy a GTX 580 System and I planned to get the Phenom II X6 1090T /1100T for it... Would you suggest waiting another painful few days for those damn Sandy Bridges to appear in the online stores?
[QUOTE=yellowsn0w;27177270]So, I'm just having enough money to buy a GTX 580 System and I planned to get the Phenom II X6 1090T /1100T for it... Would you suggest waiting another painful few days for those damn Sandy Bridges to appear in the online stores?[/QUOTE] Yes.
[QUOTE=Badal;27177231]Using a BIOS mod to remove the ~47 multiplier lock to go to ~55 (i think, numbers are off a bit), the guy in this thread is claiming to get 5.4 [B]on air.[/B] [url]http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=15952[/url][/QUOTE] Goddangit.
[QUOTE=thf;27177455]Yes.[/QUOTE] Are there official release dates for those big (european) retailers?
I thought it launches everywhere in January 9th
Wow, now my fucking 955 feels like a Pentium 2...
looks like they're sticking with the same stock cooler [url=http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/cpu/intel/sandybridge/review/_DSC7078.jpg]large image ahoy[/url]
well, if it can go to 4.4GHz on stock, then either: the stock cooler is efficient or... the CPU doesn't take a lot to cool, which would allows for even more overclocking with an aftermarket cooler [editline]wefe[/editline] I guess either way is a plus
[QUOTE=reapaninja;27180902]looks like they're sticking with the same stock cooler [url=http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/cpu/intel/sandybridge/review/_DSC7078.jpg]large image ahoy[/url][/QUOTE] No, there's a new one, it's just shorter and uses a different fan IIRC. Same design though. [img]http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/cpu/intel/sandybridge/arch/newheatsink.jpg[/img] Sandy on the left, old on the right.
[QUOTE=Zombii;27180983]No, there's a new one, it's just shorter and uses a different fan IIRC. Same design though. [img_thumb]http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/cpu/intel/sandybridge/arch/newheatsink.jpg[/img_thumb] Sandy on the left, old on the right.[/QUOTE] holy shit, people are getting decent overclocks with [I]that[/I]?
I'm gonna be running one on a hyper 212+. Reusing from my current 955.
[QUOTE=reapaninja;27181244]holy shit, people are getting decent overclocks with [I]that[/I]?[/QUOTE] They must run pretty cool.
Imagine a fully watercooled Sandy Bridge rig's overclock... rate rainbows
I have not seen a heatsink that thin since the days of the original Pentium. I really want to see waht the real performance marks are though. Not the rated and pre-release ones. We were ALL disappointed when the real results started trickling out about what the Willamette and Northwood was like.
Interesting tidbit from the Hardware Canucks review: Based on a third-party's extensive testing of 100 retail D2 stepping processors, this is how Sandy Bridge is shaping up on the overclocking front: * Approximately 50% of CPUs can go up to 4.4~4.5 GHz * Approximately 40% of CPUs can go up to 4.6~4.7 GHz * Approximately 10% of CPUs can go up to 4.8~5 GHz (50+ multipliers are about 2% of this group) [editline]3rd January 2011[/editline] The individual quality of your particular chip is going to decide what multiplier you can get.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.