CIPWTTKT&GC V0x0F (v15): Scoot and Deeps Drama Diaries
25,625 replies, posted
Fun fact: I've never tried RMA'ing anything I've bought. I guess I'm just lucky as shit.
[QUOTE=ze beaver;31596371]What's funny with IPoAC is that I could buy a 100 GB SSD, strap it to the poor thing and it would take less time AND be cheaper than sending 100 GB of data over my current connection :v:
:suicide:
[editline]7th August 2011[/editline]
Just checked the prices for 100 GB SSDs, I thought those things had dropped in price a while ago :byodood:
Let's just say a 1 TB HDD, that's A LOT cheaper.[/QUOTE]
Wasn't there a Canadian service where you bought a hdd and had a guy go to the us, Download the files and then give you the hdd
Damn I can't stand my sister bitching about the PSN being hacked.
She's making the assumption that Steam and Xbox Live are going to be hacked aswell.
She also thinks SSL isn't secure
:suicide:
...
Her favourite auction site uses it.
SHE WON'T STOOOOPPPPP
[QUOTE=gman003-main;31594380]Top this:
[code]Script started on Sat Apr 28 11:24:09 2001
vegard@gyversalen:~$ /sbin/ifconfig tun0
tun0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:10.0.3.2 P-t-P:10.0.3.1 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:150 Metric:1
RX packets:1 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
RX bytes:88 (88.0 b) TX bytes:168 (168.0 b)
vegard@gyversalen:~$ ping -c 9 -i 900 10.0.3.1
PING 10.0.3.1 (10.0.3.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=6165731.1 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=3211900.8 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=5124922.8 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=6388671.9 ms
--- 10.0.3.1 ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 55% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 3211900.8/5222806.6/6388671.9 ms
vegard@gyversalen:~$ exit
Script done on Sat Apr 28 14:14:28 2001[/code]
Average latency of [i]an hour and a half[/i], and even odds of dropping a packet.[/QUOTE]
Hmm, this was a test of my ping to League of Legends servers. They claim the insane latency I have on LoL is my fault.
[code]
Pinging google.com [209.85.146.147] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=371ms TTL=52
Ping statistics for 209.85.146.147:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 371ms, Average = 114ms
Pinging euw.leagueoflegends.com [64.7.194.247] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Ping statistics for 64.7.194.247:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
Pinging na.leagueoflegends.com [64.7.194.248] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Ping statistics for 64.7.194.248:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
Pinging facebook.com [69.63.189.16] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 69.63.189.16: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=245
Reply from 69.63.189.16: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=245
Reply from 69.63.189.16: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=245
Reply from 69.63.189.16: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=245
Ping statistics for 69.63.189.16:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 102ms, Maximum = 111ms, Average = 106ms
Pinging facebook.com [69.63.189.16] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 69.63.189.16: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=245
Reply from 69.63.189.16: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=245
Reply from 69.63.189.16: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=245
Reply from 69.63.189.16: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=245
Ping statistics for 69.63.189.16:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 100ms, Maximum = 116ms, Average = 105ms
[/code]
[QUOTE=SataniX;31599695]Hmm, this was a test of my ping to League of Legends servers. They claim the insane latency I have on LoL is my fault.
[code]
Pinging google.com [209.85.146.147] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.85.146.147: bytes=32 time=371ms TTL=52
Ping statistics for 209.85.146.147:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 371ms, Average = 114ms
Pinging euw.leagueoflegends.com [64.7.194.247] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Ping statistics for 64.7.194.247:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
Pinging na.leagueoflegends.com [64.7.194.248] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Ping statistics for 64.7.194.248:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
Pinging facebook.com [69.63.189.16] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 69.63.189.16: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=245
Reply from 69.63.189.16: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=245
Reply from 69.63.189.16: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=245
Reply from 69.63.189.16: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=245
Ping statistics for 69.63.189.16:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 102ms, Maximum = 111ms, Average = 106ms
Pinging facebook.com [69.63.189.16] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 69.63.189.16: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=245
Reply from 69.63.189.16: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=245
Reply from 69.63.189.16: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=245
Reply from 69.63.189.16: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=245
Ping statistics for 69.63.189.16:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 100ms, Maximum = 116ms, Average = 105ms
[/code][/QUOTE]
your fault hahahahhahahahahh funny joke now fix the lag for this poor man
[QUOTE=wlzshroom;31600291]your fault hahahahhahahahahh funny joke now fix the lag for this poor man[/QUOTE]
It can happen, someone I know's ISP was somehow routing his connection to a server something like this
His PC > Node > Node > ISP > Node in another state > Node in the state the server is in > Node in the middle of Malaysia > Node in server's state > Datacenter > Server
They were set on convincing him that it was his router's fault and how he should reboot his computer and all that scripted shit.
[QUOTE=kaze4159;31600473]It can happen, someone I know's ISP was somehow routing his connection to a server something like this
His PC > Node > Node > ISP > Node in another state > Node in the state the server is in > Node in the middle of Malaysia > Node in server's state > Datacenter > Server
They were set on convincing him that it was his router's fault and how he should reboot his computer and all that scripted shit.[/QUOTE]
What ISP was this, So I can avoid them.
[QUOTE=kaze4159;31600473]It can happen, someone I know's ISP was somehow routing his connection to a server something like this
His PC > Node > Node > ISP > Node in another state > Node in the state the server is in > Node in the middle of Malaysia > Node in server's state > Datacenter > Server
They were set on convincing him that it was his router's fault and how he should reboot his computer and all that scripted shit.[/QUOTE]
Around the World in Eighty Nodes.
[QUOTE=kaze4159;31600473]It can happen, someone I know's ISP was somehow routing his connection to a server something like this
His PC > Node > Node > ISP > Node in another state > Node in the state the server is in > Node in the middle of Malaysia > Node in server's state > Datacenter > Server
They were set on convincing him that it was his router's fault and how he should reboot his computer and all that scripted shit.[/QUOTE]
If he was to load anything via that routing, Then it better be this
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9MszVE7aR4[/media]
[QUOTE=wingless;31600671]What ISP was this, So I can avoid them.[/QUOTE]
I think it was TPG
You guys want content? I'll deliver but it may induce rage.
[url]http://www.facebook.com/thegadgetshow[/url]
Go through Apple posts or Android posts and look for a guy called Juan A.
I genuinely feel sorry for Apple users being represented by him.
[QUOTE=kaze4159;31600943]I think it was TPG[/QUOTE]
We used to have TPG. It was slow as shit, and the off peak/on peak download system was annoying as fuck.
Glad we have a better ISP now. :buddy:
[QUOTE=kaze4159;31600943]I think it was TPG[/QUOTE]
I'm with TPG.
Fuck.
[editline]8th August 2011[/editline]
Actually if I was routed like that it would explain a lot of problems.
[QUOTE=wingless;31601231]I'm with TPG.
Fuck.
[editline]8th August 2011[/editline]
Actually if I was routed like that it would explain a lot of problems.[/QUOTE]
Try a Traceroute, see if there's any ridiculous jumps in latency
[QUOTE=kaze4159;31601307]Try a Traceroute, see if there's any ridiculous jumps in latency[/QUOTE]
Thankfully not.
[QUOTE=kaze4159;31600943]I think it was TPG[/QUOTE]
Damn, I was going to go with TPG to get off Bigpond. That unlimited ADSL2+ plan for I think $60 sounded really appealing over our current 50GB for $50... but we do get quite a fast connection (1.2 MB/s, which probably seems horribly slow to everyone else, but it's blazing speeds to me).
Don't take my word for it, I can't remember jack shit very well :v:
Yet I still remember the combination, length and description of my bike lock from at least 7 years ago
[QUOTE=ultradude25;31601461]Damn, I was going to go with TPG to get off Bigpond. That unlimited ADSL2+ plan for I think $60 sounded really appealing over our current 50GB for $50... but we do get quite a fast connection (1.2 MB/s, which probably seems horribly slow to everyone else, but it's blazing speeds to me).[/QUOTE]
Even if the node thing isn't true, TPG's service is shit. Don't go with them.
[QUOTE=wingless;31601601]Even if the node thing isn't true, TPG's service is shit. Don't go with them.[/QUOTE]
There's a reason we call them "The Penis Group"
Yeah, I just did a tracert.
To get me to the EU league of legends servers, it's routing me through Texas, Atlanta, Washington and Argentina.
[code]
Tracing route to euw.leagueoflegends.com [64.7.194.247]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 401 ms 451 ms 672 ms 192.168.0.1
2 1094 ms 1185 ms 1616 ms lns3.uan.the.uk.murphx.net [94.30.127.74]
3 1813 ms 2202 ms 2158 ms er1.uan.the.uk.murphx.net [94.30.127.65]
4 1312 ms 592 ms 696 ms ge2-6-1.crs1.core.the.uk.murphx.net [94.30.127.225]
5 435 ms 865 ms 636 ms ge1-2-1.crs2.core.the.uk.murphx.net [109.170.249.30]
6 1087 ms 1855 ms 2900 ms ge1-1-1.crs1.core.thn.uk.murphx.net [109.170.249.26]
7 2132 ms 1999 ms 3060 ms te2-3.cr05.tn5.bb.gxn.net [62.72.139.97]
8 3768 ms * * 195.66.224.130
9 * * * Request timed out.
10 * 2720 ms 1466 ms te-3-0-0.rar3.washington-dc.us.xo.net [207.88.12.74]
11 1355 ms 1009 ms 759 ms te-3-0-0.rar3.atlanta-ga.us.xo.net [207.88.12.9]
12 534 ms 498 ms 730 ms te-3-0-0.rar3.dallas-tx.us.xo.net [207.88.12.2]
13 710 ms 744 ms 747 ms vb12.rar3.la-ca.us.xo.net [207.88.12.46]
14 458 ms 588 ms 761 ms 207.88.14.46.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.14.46]
15 855 ms 957 ms 791 ms 207.88.186.146.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.186.146]
16 1524 ms 1262 ms 1605 ms border1.te9-1-bbnet2.lax010.pnap.net [216.52.255.103]
17 * * * Request timed out.
18 * * * Request timed out.
19 * * * Request timed out.
20 * * * Request timed out.
21 * * * Request timed out.
22 [/code]
[QUOTE=PyroCF;31600979]You guys want content? I'll deliver but it may induce rage.
[url]http://www.facebook.com/thegadgetshow[/url]
Go through Apple posts or Android posts and look for a guy called Juan A.
I genuinely feel sorry for Apple users being represented by him.[/QUOTE]
[quote]Call of Duty: Black Ops Rezurrection maps pack[/quote] Like I'm going to take advice and reviews from hipsters who can't spell.
[editline]8th August 2011[/editline]
Oh and,
[quote]Kieran, considering I have repaired and built windows pcs in the past I think I can safely say I know the system inside out, but then again I am not a skint anti apple person, no matter what you spend on a pc the end result is about the same, thats the truth! A user does not "crash" the system, a user can be clueless how to do things but the system crashes because it's poor, dont forget most if not all pc manufacturers "tweak" windows in some way! Unlike with a Mac where what you see at apple is what you get at home! Or office or even in schools (seen a few schools get iMacs recently)![/quote]
I have yet to crash on this laptop. "o i no teh system inside n out" no you don't, you think you do. And the OS isn't to do with the parts if that's what you're implying. /sadrant
[QUOTE=FlakTheMighty;31601735]Like I'm going to take advice and reviews from hipsters who can't spell.
[editline]8th August 2011[/editline]
Oh and,
I have yet to crash on this laptop. "o i no teh system inside n out" no you don't, you think you do. And the OS isn't to do with the parts if that's what you're implying. /sadrant[/QUOTE]
For the love of god don't look at his Android posts.
i'm not going to wade through shit to look at shittier shit, but do his android posts say anything about how "fragmented" the OS is or how it can't be good because it's spread across a diverse array of devices?
because if so i may just shit myself.
[QUOTE=Derpmeifter;31602142]i'm not going to wade through shit to look at shittier shit, but do his android posts say anything about how "fragmented" the OS is or how it can't be good because it's spread across a diverse array of devices?
because if so i may just shit myself.[/QUOTE]
" Fandroids are as dumb as they come it seems, do not have the ability co comprehend that android is only larger than iOS because its on more devices by more manufacturers, does not take a genius to work out that it will have larger market share by default...however if it was only on one device, the argument may be VERY much different, iOS does not need to be on multiple manufacturers for it to be where it is, just shows android NEEDS all the manufactures and all the models from each manufacturer to compete with the iPhone, from a single manufacturer. Sorry, but the evidence is obvious, the fact android no matter what, still blab on about android being the largest and better proves how think (or un educated) the average android user is."
It's mainly how he calls everyone who doesn't share the same viewpoint trolls etc.
[QUOTE=PyroCF;31602165]" Fandroids are as dumb as they come it seems, do not have the ability co comprehend that android is only larger than iOS because its on more devices by more manufacturers, does not take a genius to work out that it will have larger market share by default...however if it was only on one device, the argument may be VERY much different, iOS does not need to be on multiple manufacturers for it to be where it is, just shows android NEEDS all the manufactures and all the models from each manufacturer to compete with the iPhone, from a single manufacturer. Sorry, but the evidence is obvious, the fact android no matter what, still blab on about android being the largest and better proves how think (or un educated) the average android user is."
It's mainly how he calls everyone who doesn't share the same viewpoint trolls etc.[/QUOTE]
oops i needs new pants now thanks
[QUOTE=PyroCF;31602165]" Fandroids are as dumb as they come it seems, do not have the ability co comprehend that android is only larger than iOS because its on more devices by more manufacturers, does not take a genius to work out that it will have larger market share by default...however if it was only on one device, the argument may be VERY much different, iOS does not need to be on multiple manufacturers for it to be where it is, just shows android NEEDS all the manufactures and all the models from each manufacturer to compete with the iPhone, from a single manufacturer. Sorry, but the evidence is obvious, the fact android no matter what, still blab on about android being the largest and better proves how think (or un educated) the average android user is."
It's mainly how he calls everyone who doesn't share the same viewpoint trolls etc.[/QUOTE]
Stop posting that shit now, otherwise my will be monitor is useless.
[QUOTE=wingless;31602211]Stop posting that shit now, otherwise my will be monitor is useless.[/QUOTE]
Huh
[QUOTE=PyroCF;31602247]Huh[/QUOTE]
I have a golf club next to my desk, if that tips you off.
[QUOTE=Oicani Gonzales;31602260]Every time someone links to a Daft Punk music video I just have to watch it all the way to the end. Damn you [img]http://i.somethingawful.com/forumsystem/emoticons/emot-arghfist.gif[/img][/QUOTE]
You say that as if it was a bad thing
also [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjli3hj0ZkM&ob=av3e[/media]
:v:
[QUOTE=BreenIsALie;31602358]You say that as if it was a bad thing
also [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjli3hj0ZkM&ob=av3e[/media]
:v:[/QUOTE]
I hate you. That's my 2nd favourite song, ever.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.