CIPWTTKT&GC V0x0F (v15): Scoot and Deeps Drama Diaries
25,625 replies, posted
27,000 bro gamers and 12 year olds with adhd swarming to one location on the internet
[editline]2nd September 2011[/editline]
/b/ might go quiet for a while
Everything with XP in it would be good five years ago (Windows XP, CoD XP, etc)
Derp Activision set a CoD Tournament up, 1st prize is [b]1 Million dollars[/b]
That's probably the only reason people actually want to play it :v:
[QUOTE=Goz3rr;32077572]Derp Activision set a CoD Tournament up, 1st prize is [b]1 Million dollars[/b][/QUOTE]
The winner will spend all of it on CoD DLC's anyway.
[QUOTE=chrishind10;32077635]The winner will spend all of it on CoD DLC's anyway.[/QUOTE]
Activision Blizzard vs Rail Simulator Developments having a challenge on who can make the most money from DLC?
[QUOTE=Warship;32077507]Everything with XP in it would be good five years ago (Windows XP, CoD XP, etc)[/QUOTE]
I tweeted that with the #XP2011 hashtag and it showed up on the livestream LOL
[editline]2nd September 2011[/editline]
Seananners is the only nice guy there :v:
Today in our Linux class, one of my friends logged onto Facebook on the public account that everyone has a password for, on all the computers.
You know how Firefox 3.6 has that little bar that asks if you want to save the password? He never closed it.
He left Firefox open and locked the computer when we had food.
I come back from eating, sit at my computer. He was on the computer next to me.
Another friend logged onto the computer since he had the password for the public account.
The bar was still there. He answered yes and logged straight in.
Oh boy, did I have fun. Changed his profile picture into chicken on a raft, set him as Female and he's interested in men etc. all the good stuff, then another guy opened his friends list. Went through all the chicks. I'll leave it at that.
Then when everyone left the computer, I remembered, there's the saved passwords thing in Firefox.
Opened it, saw password, sent it to him as a text message, he just got back from the city apparently so he fucking sprinted into the class, shit was awesome.
[QUOTE=VistaPOWA;32074901]I got flagged by Google for suspicious activity :tinfoil:
[t]http://localhostr.com/files/lX4VpZi/temp34.png[/t][/QUOTE]
I got that page too, but then I Googled a different string (specifically "am I really blocked by Google?") and it worked.
My sister's birthday is today. My mother took her to Walmart to pick out a game for her birthday, and she bought the new Nintendogs game for the 3DS. She got home and excitedly started it up, only to find that it didn't work.
She has a Nintendo DS, and it didn't occur to her or my mother that a 3DS game wouldn't work with a DS.
[QUOTE=Mandrith;32077871]My sister's birthday is today. My mother took her to Walmart to pick out a game for her birthday, and she bought the new Nintendogs game for the 3DS. She got home and excitedly started it up, only to find that it didn't work.
She has a Nintendo DS, and it didn't occur to her or my mother that a 3DS game wouldn't work with a DS.[/QUOTE]
I'm seeing a correlation between your parents use of Macs and general inteligence.
[QUOTE=chrishind10;32077905]I'm seeing a correlation between your parents use of Macs and general inteligence.[/QUOTE]
My parents aren't idiots in general at all, but when it comes to technology they tend to be a bit stupid.
[editline]2nd September 2011[/editline]
Also, [url=http://www.gog.com/en/gamecard/ultima_4]Ultima 4 is now free on GOG[/url].
durr guys i crashed Linux :downs:
[QUOTE=lavacano;32078022]durr guys i crashed Linux :downs:[/QUOTE]
It's suprisingly easy to do. (either that or I'm useless when it comes to using it)
[QUOTE=chrishind10;32078077]It's suprisingly easy to do. (either that or I'm useless when it comes to using it)[/QUOTE]
Well, I didn't actually crash Linux itself - I just crashed what appears to be all of KDE. Bad weather plasmoid.
[QUOTE=lavacano;32078088]Well, I didn't actually crash Linux itself - I just crashed what appears to be all of KDE. Bad weather plasmoid.[/QUOTE]
I can crash KDE too. Just set the wallpaper to a model of earth with realtime day/night cycles :v:
Q6600 and 4gigs of ddr2 ram for my server for about 700SEK/$100 good deal?
[QUOTE=chipset;32078223]Q6600 and 4gigs of ddr2 ram for my server for about 700SEK/$100 good deal?[/QUOTE]
Seems pretty reasonable to me.
[QUOTE=Goz3rr;32077322]
Are you fucking joking?
[b]Explosive attack dogs[/b]
ONLY IN MW3![/QUOTE]
Sounds like WW2.
[editline]2nd September 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=chipset;32078223]Q6600 and 4gigs of ddr2 ram for my server for about 700SEK/$100 good deal?[/QUOTE]
yes. As 4 gigs of DDR2 is like 35-40 bucks, and the Q66 still is a pretty decent CPU.
goddommot Portage why do all these Perl modules have their own virtuals
For those who don't use Gentoo (and think I'm just running my mouth off into a paper bag hobo style), I'll explain.
A "virtual" is a metapackage - basically a package that does nothing. It's not like the usual metapackage in that it only serves as a simple name to pull in large sets of packages. It actually gets marked as installed when [b]one[/b] (or more I guess) of it's listed packages are installed. This is because a program may depend on some other program, but three other programs in the Portage tree do the exact same thing (or whatever). Example: virtual/mysql is installed when any of the flavors of MySQL are installed. virtual/jre is installed when you have any JRE installed. virtual/logger...etc. That way packages can just depend on the virtuals.
But for some inexplicable reason, a lot of Perl modules have their own virtuals. They're named after their package name and everything. I quite frankly am confused.
[QUOTE=Goz3rr;32077322]
Right now 27k viewers are watching this:[/QUOTE]
72K now...
[editline]2nd September 2011[/editline]
Lol this is so dumb. Now they are just promoting Jeep.
[QUOTE=lavacano;32078449]goddommot Portage why do all these Perl modules have their own virtuals
For those who don't use Gentoo (and think I'm just running my mouth off into a paper bag hobo style), I'll explain.
A "virtual" is a metapackage - basically a package that does nothing. It's not like the usual metapackage in that it only serves as a simple name to pull in large sets of packages. It actually gets marked as installed when [B]one[/B] (or more I guess) of it's listed packages are installed. This is because a program may depend on some other program, but three other programs in the Portage tree do the exact same thing (or whatever). Example: virtual/mysql is installed when any of the flavors of MySQL are installed. virtual/jre is installed when you have any JRE installed. virtual/logger...etc. That way packages can just depend on the virtuals.
But for some inexplicable reason, a lot of Perl modules have their own virtuals. They're named after their package name and everything. I quite frankly am confused.[/QUOTE]
If I understand this, wouldn't it be because some of the perl modules don't act in the same way as regular perl? To prevent a program calling a function the modified perl can't do/does differently.
[QUOTE=BrainDeath;32078918]If I understand this, wouldn't it be because some of the perl modules don't act in the same way as regular perl? To prevent a program calling a function the modified perl can't do/does differently.[/QUOTE]
I don't think so because the actual program doesn't use the "virtual". It can't, the virtual itself doesn't actually do anything. It's using the package the virtual calls in (the actual Perl module). And I don't think Perl is modified in Gentoo in any way, but I could be wrong there.
Girl in my class used a DSLR for what I guess must have been the first time, on a two day introduction trip with the rest of my class. She ran around with it on full auto and shot pictures of pretty much everything. I mentioned manual focus and such to her, so she could maybe play around with it a little. Instead, she runs around with it on manual focus, taking pictures of moving objects [i]while fucking moving[/i]. If you can do that while tapping the "shoot" button like a horny rabbit, and still take a decent picture, you're a god. Anyhow, she had, like me, borrowed it from another girl who didn't really use it all that much, so I got to check out the pictures when I got hold of it, and well, pretty much every picture was a blurry mess. That's mildly annoying for me, who actually wants to use the camera for picturing something looking slightly related to a human being, in the least, but half-way rage-inducing when she mentions on her facebook "I really need a DLSR". I really hope that she doesn't get one, unless she actually wants to take it seriously.
[QUOTE=GoDong-DK;32080093]Girl in my class used a DLSR for what I guess must have been the first time, on a two day introduction trip with the rest of my class. She ran around with it on full auto and shot pictures of pretty much everything. I mentioned manual focus and such to her, so she could maybe play around with it a little. Instead, she runs around with it on manual focus, taking pictures of moving objects [i]while fucking moving[/i]. If you can do that while tapping the "shoot" button like a horny rabbit, and still take a decent picture, you're a god. Anyhow, she had, like me, borrowed it from another girl who didn't really use it all that much, so I got to check out the pictures when I got hold of it, and well, pretty much every picture was a blurry mess. That's mildly annoying for me, who actually wants to use the camera for picturing something looking slightly related to a human being, in the least, but half-way rage-inducing when she mentions on her facebook "I really need a DLSR". I really hope that she doesn't get one, unless she actually wants to take it seriously.[/QUOTE]
Isn't it [B]DSLR[/B]? :v:
And yeah, that kind of crap bugs the hell out of me too..I mean running around taking random pictures is great and all (and can lead to some..interesting photos sometimes) but if that's all someone uses a DSLR for they need to get slapped.
[QUOTE=Lyoko774;32080875]Isn't it [B]DSLR[/B]? :v:
And yeah, that kind of crap bugs the hell out of me too..I mean running around taking random pictures is great and all (and can lead to some..interesting photos sometimes) but if that's all someone uses a DSLR for they need to get slapped.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, fixed now. Nothing of interest came out of it, and I didn't see her use much more than a second thinking and taking a picture. She pretty much shot ~300 pictures in an hour.
[QUOTE=GoDong-DK;32080900]Yeah, fixed now. Nothing of interest came out of it, and I didn't see her use much more than a second thinking and taking a picture. She pretty much shot ~300 pictures in an hour.[/QUOTE]
Ugh.
I truly wish I had a DSLR, I'd at least make an effort. :v:
I just want a camera that isn't shitty.
While I'd use a DSLR properly (actually taking time and effort)
how to handle CIPWTTKT:
As a group, we were told to go out of class to work on a group assignment - we had 30 minutes, but our group finished in 10. So we decided to just kill 15-20 minutes of time because we could. Some of us pull out our cell phones, including me. This one guy at the opposite end of the table says this to me, "I'm going to go play games on my IPHONE because it's BETTER than that lagging piece of shit android," and he practically yelled what I put in caps. Naturally everyone looked at me for a response to what was clearly him picking some sort of fight. I simply replied "Well that's like, your opinion, man" in the most The Dude Lebowsky way I could. He backed off and things went back to normal.
[QUOTE=GoDong-DK;32080093]Girl in my class use....take it seriously.[/QUOTE]
To be fair, To get your hands on an expensive camera and just running around taking pics at stupid things is very fun. When me and a classmate got our hands on one of my schools cameras, We just took pictures of paper airplanes and spinning coins with as fast a shutter time as possible. Had maybe 1gb of raw footage from that alone
And of course, Running around the school taking pics of everyone and everything
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.